@Gcarmi21@stretch8325 The "he has to show up" isn't made up. The Niners are on the hook for zero dollars if he doesn't show. It's financially in their interest to not cut him until he reports to the team. He'd already be cut if he'd had reported to voluntary mini-camp. No way 9ers would risk injury $
@Ravenwild9@Tonysmarkettips Actually there's millions of reasons. Until he's reinstated and shows up he doesn't count against the 49ers cap. If they cut him now, they'll have dead money on the cap. If he doesn't show up for the remainder of the contract then they don't have a cap hit at all
@Richardknowmoss@serenity67 Yeah, not really gonna believe much from a guy who thinks Lew Wolff was the A's owner in 2014. And the backlash from fans surely does bother him. Otherwise they wouldn't do all the petty shit they do to fans still protesting.
@serenity67@oaklandfans The problem is that he's trying to put the horse back in the barn and it's a little late for that. At every turn he makes the wrong choice and then has to do some lame PR stunts to try and make up for it. Him and the CEO of Bricks and Minifigs could be BFFs with their stupidity
@Richardknowmoss@serenity67 Fuck that. It's Fuck John Fisher til he dies. There's no reason to let him off the hook for the shit he pulled that resulted in the loss of two pro sports franchises for a city. #selltheteam#fjf
@DarthVegas06969@phares_tim@BenKolina Affordable housing has everything to do when you're trying to attach a $12B development to a baseball stadium. Fisher created something so big it wouldn't work, and the closer Oakland got to making it happen the more he kept moving through goal posts
@Luckylo75@Coach_Yac If they release him it counts against the cap. If he never shows up, he goes on the Reserve/Did Not Report and it doesn't. It's not that hard. They save by not releasing him until he reports to camp
@ncknln@JesseRogersESPN AI says it is roughly 47%-53%. So the players would gain 3%. Also as far as I know there isn't a static or written revenue split because they don't have the cap so owners are free to spend as much or as little as they want
@As_Fan_Radio@DmoWriter@Athletics But then Fisher wouldn't have gotten the largest chunk of revenue sharing possible. He would have been removed from it and have to pay for his players on his own. The more amazing part is 29 other owners would rather subsidize a cheap skate than force him out of the club.