But honestly, the take away that we need to rebuild a social esteem and public good that doesn’t rely on blind credentialism something else worth meditating on.
I happen to be in the process of porting all my content to a new platform, but since it came up again I thought I’d drop some really ancient writing I did (backed up thank god):
https://t.co/oFOP3hRUPE
@WKCosmo@CosmicDaryl Will I appreciate the sentiment, but there’s been good and bad faith people on both sides and has been since I was a kid. It’s more nuanced than that. The astronomers have historically been real shitheads too.
@alz_zyd_ I dunno. I asked a few models to do some relatively simple matrix calculations (admittedly for general n) and I caught them making all kinds of sign errors, and other mistakes just like people.
Science feels like the closest thing we have to an objective sense of right and wrong, but even it needs us to assume and agree upon on something things.
It’s harder but I like it that way.
I'm not an atheist, but I never understood why God is able to determine right and wrong.
If God says "it's wrong to be gay", is it really wrong? Why? Sure, He can send you to Hell if He wants, but punishment doesn't determine what's right and what's wrong.
Maybe. But in the mean time they seem to struggle with calculations involving quadratic polynomials, for instance working with representations of sp(2n,R).
If anything it’s endearing to think that machines also struggle with moving too fast and making sign errors.