Search results for ASHTON

Ashton, you need to chill out. These things are easily possible and links to weapons company show a miniature bomb being made near Charlie Kirks Murder. israel made the lebanon bomb pagers too... And israel paid Charlie Kirk $100M+, now that he was against the iran war and even israel itself, they were extremely pissed about their top Goyim. So your saying you dont think israel had involvement? even with the phone data showing israelis popping up in the area. The trial is ongoing? Great, hopefully its open, because if mossad is involved they will cover it up. If you care that much watch Candace's new video on this, it brings together the facts and allegations.

Ashton, this is the kind of argument people make when they confuse movie physics with terminal ballistics. 🤡 A bullet and an explosive do not wound the same way. A bullet transfers force through mass, speed, shape, yaw, fragmentation, and tissue disruption. Depending on caliber, angle, distance, barrier material, and what it hits, it might pass through cleanly, deform, fragment, or create a larger wound cavity. So no, “a bullet would have torn his head off” is not science. It is barstool ballistics with a shitty Wi-Fi connection. Now let’s talk shaped charges. A shaped charge does not need to blow the entire body apart to be lethal. Its design focuses explosive energy into a narrow, high-velocity jet or slug. That focused energy punches into a target instead of spreading outward like a crude blast. That means the visible entry wound might look small compared to the internal damage. Small hole outside. Catastrophic trauma inside. This is not exotic or taboo. Militaries have understood shaped charges for decades. They are used because focused energy beats raw blast when penetration matters. So your argument falls apart twice. First, you assume bullets always create massive visible destruction. Wrong. Second, you assume explosives always create massive external destruction. Also wrong. A focused explosive effect is not judged by the size of the hole on the surface. It is judged by the energy delivered inside the target. You are mocking people for not understanding something while proving you don’t understand it either. That’s not debunking. That’s ignorance. Example below of an EFP that is interchangeable with scale.

2028 PG Ashton Wilbur 🏀 6’1” | 160 lbs 📍 Cathedral Prep (PA) 📚 4.0 GPA (4.5 Weighted) ⭐️ 2-Year Varsity Starter 📈 Sophomore Stats: 10.9 PPG | 2.1 APG | 3.9 RPG | 1.8 SPG 🎯 45% 3PT | 56% FG 🏆 Team Record (2 Years): 43-10 (81%) 🏆 Sophomore Team Record: 25-2 🏆 District 10 Champion | Region 7 Champion | Region 7 Second Team 🎥 High School Highlights: https://t.co/CnLs4j7MZt 🎥 AAU Highlights: https://t.co/XnCOT6zefG https://t.co/CnLs4j7MZt