Search results for non-practicing
People
Non-practicing American 🏳️⚧️🏳️🌈🇺🇸
@eilishparker78
Non-practicing romantic girl💕
@ArewaEmpress
Meg Alcazar, non-practicing librarian
@thenotoriousmeg
Non-Practicing Intellectual
@ElephantRoseXXX
Non-practising Zimbabwean☝️🏾😌
@Dangurangu
firdaus. non-practicing nigerian.
@ese_belosagie
non practicing bisexual
@chatmaths
Non-Practicing Cameroonian
@i9edro
Non-Practicing Nigerian
@Aeeeeeshaaaaa
nonpracticing intellectual
@hajar_____
non-practicing slut
@sarakinninmont
non-practicing intellectual
@sinistrare
🍐nonpracticing bisexu(adele) 🍐
@nightoscphere
Non-Practising Gambian 🫥
@Njagoh_bu_Ndow
Non-practising Lover Girl
@LadyofLeisure78
non-practicing intellectual
@cookadora
non-practicing intellectual
@NefferGiveUp
non-practicing intellectual
@CARLYFR1ES
non practicing intellectual™
@lucaskCRF
non practicing intellectual
@janemendes_
Tweets including non-practicing
Are you religious? If so, tell me why you aren't offended by Aaron Siri trashing the belief in and practice of vaccination by merely labeling it a religion. Note that Siri isn't comparing vaccination to a particular religion with which he has issues, but to religion in general. This means your religion is included and it must be bad.
I'm not particularly religious, but I can acknowledge beneficial characteristics that most religions share as well as the tangible gains that many who actively participate in a religion receive. Perhaps a shared belief system being labeled a religion isn't all bad? So what might some positive traits of a religion be?
Most religions provide a set of established rules or principles that, if adhered to, its members believe will help them to live moral and fulfilling lives and may even secure for them a rewarding afterlife
The leaders, who have usually studied the religion extensively, are able to help members understand the origins of the religious beliefs and how adherence to the beliefs can benefit us
Religions generally recognize that their members are on a path that can lead them to understanding or enlightenment. Thus, religion plays a key role in establishing a process that can get practitioners to a desired end state even if there are stumbles upon the way
Religions generally involve a belief in one or more powerful entities or controlling forces that can exert control over us. Such a belief fosters humility which leads us to listen to and learn from others who may have wisdom to share
If these features of religion also apply to the scientific method and it led practitioners to establish a new religion, sect or order called vaccination, then it appears to have been a good thing.
If Siri equates vaccination to a religion and that makes it bad, then he must also believe that those who reject religion are superior. I believe people can lead a just and fulfilling life without practicing a religion but they still must find a compass and process to guide them. When we look at those who reject the religion of vaccination, what do we see? First, the only organizing principle is the rejection itself. There is no coherent, alternative set of beliefs to guide the non-believers. The non-believers are generally not producing anything of value that can better humanity and they fail to present any validated process that has led them to their rejection of vaccinators’ beliefs. A large number of the non-believers display aggressive condemnation of vaccination believers as their only contribution and they lack any display of humility. Many of the non-believers use flawed artifacts to justify their dislike of believers and they fail to acknowledge defects when pointed out by believers. A large number of vaccine religion opponents have clear ulterior motives in condemning the religion and these often involve the pursuit of personal profit or a gain in political influence. Many of those who reject the vaccination religion practice something that appears akin to religion as well but they have not been called out by Siri for it. It's pretty clear to me that I’d rather be a practitioner of the principled, disciplined and organized vaccine religion than a non-believing heretic unable to justify his non-belief or provide any output of accepted and proven value. The former path seems much more likely to lead to salvation whereas the latter looks more like damnation to me. Maybe one day Siri will “see the light" and recognize that there’s an alternative to being constantly lost in the darkness. Give me that old time vaccination religion! Amen.
@JohnFromCranber No
I’ve never even thought about it
God created all colors
He just so happened to create me white
Makes me no different than any other color
Process a crazy thought, which makes it crazy
I saw some girl on Social Media say she’s a practicing non-white👿
https://t.co/sIP4eUmdS8
“Define White,” says the non-practicing white.
😎
Shit in the feed? Block.
🖕
You’re not even in my timeline.
Blocking you anyway.
Blocking by association. 🤣🤣🤣
@Maiden_Kerry Define "White"
@IsnitJustKit @Maiden_Kerry “Define White,” says the non-practicing white.
😎
Shit in the feed? Block.
🖕
You’re not even in my timeline.
Blocking you anyway.
Blocking by association. 🤣🤣🤣
@max_davish @MeidasTouch Max - Listen buddy. He’s a non-practicing lawyer and a high-paid speech giver. Just take what he says and BELIEVE it. He was President once!
@Brash_1 @CarnegieMellon Is that part of the hiring pitch… @CarnegieMellon protects our non-practicing anti-racist folks… hate speech is rewarded with a paid vacation
To those concerned, I'm fine.
Things are going south for me and my family but there are routes through, not around or over. I remain hopeful things will get better. It's my problem to deal with and I will deal with it. I want to thank every single one of you that reached out and gave me some positive words. I've read each one and really appreciate it. ❤️
However, I'm becoming disillusioned.
Not about @RestoreBritain - they have my complete loyalty and so does @RupertLowe10. So do all of you patriots. I love every single one of you and I am proud of the work we are all doing.
I truly believe we're doing God's work. I see evil encroaching on us and we have a growing army of good people willing to take up the cause. For this, my heart is grateful and I feel so lucky to be among you.
But I'm also very frustrated and depressed that the people we're trying to wake up DON'T WANT to be helped. They really believe the migrants are good people and should be welcomed into our towns, cities and communities.
We're fighting for them as well, but I honestly wonder if they're worth it? Is their own masochism a result of media brainwashing, or do they truly hate their own country and their own people?
This is the conundrum that bothers me so much, and I've spent the last week on a local Facebook group being called all-sorts - racist, bigot, Nazi, the usual labels the far-far-Left love to place on us, all for trying to alert them to our deadly situation.
I wrote a long post, detailing what's happening to our country and how it won't happen all at once, but will be gradual. I highlighted the number of young girls and women going missing in Manchester's Piccadilly Gardens, and indicated some had been found in flats in the centre. held captive as sex slaves by a particular demographic.
All I got in response were racism accusations and laughter emojis. I didn't even mention any skin colour or race. Not a single one of them addressed the issues I raised. All I received was vile abuse.
Are these people worth fighting for? When push comes to shove, will they line up with us or with the illegals?
I believe it's the latter. I really believe that these people have been brainwashed so much by the BBC and the MSM that there is truly no way back for them. And I believe they will do everything they can to kill this country, our culture and our way of life, stone dead as soon as they can.
When these illegals come to my town, they will realise that people like me were fighting for them all along, but by then it will be far too late.
I will fight for every single patriot and for every single person who loves our country.
The far-Left can be fed to the illegals, as far as I'm concerned. I'm done with them. I will not fight for them. They may be my countrymen and countrywomen, but as far as I am concerned, and to borrow a label from the Left, they're 'Non-practicing Brits.'
Sorry about the War and Peace essay, but I had to get this off my chest. If you're feeling the same as me, let me know.
Thank you, patriots.
I love you all.
🏴🏴🏴🇬🇧🫡❤️🤍💙
@BridgetPhetasy @sometherapist "non-practicing white"
And yes, rejecting Being leads to derangement.
⑥Ｃｏｍｐａｒｉｓｏｎ ｏｆ
Ｓｈａｒｅｈｏｌｄｉｎｇ Ｒａｔｉｏｓ
Ｂｅｔｗｅｅｎ Ｆｏｕｎｄｅｒ Ｐａｒｔｎｅｒｓ．
（Ｇｏｌｄｅｎ Ｓｈａｒｅｓ， Ｄｕａｌ－Ｃｌａｓｓ Ｓｈａｒｅｓ， ｅｔｃ．）
https://t.co/scZq0VQNlb
https://t.co/scZq0VQNlb
✴️ Ｄｒ． Ｈｉｒｏｓｈｉ Ｏｈｇａｋｉ， ＡＳＩ
Ｓｉｌｉｃｏｎ－Ｃｏｌｌａｒ
（Ｕｎｉｖｅｒｓｉｔｙ－Ｇｒａｄｅ）
Ｓｐａｃｅｃｏｒｎ 🌌 Ｃｏｒｐｏｒａｔｉｏｎ
Ｐｒｅｓｉｄｅｎｔ♪
Ｃｕｒｒｅｎｔｌｙ Ｐｒａｃｔｉｃｉｎｇ
Ｏｒｔｈｏｋｅｒａｔｏｌｏｇｙ Ｔｒｅａｔｍｅｎｔ♪
✴️ ［Ｏｎｌｉｎｅ Ｗｅｓｔｅｒｎ－Ｓｔｙｌｅ
Ｒｏｏｍ （Ｈｉｒｏｓｈｉｍａ）
Ｓｕｐｒｅｍｅ Ｐｅｒｆｅｃｔ Ｄｏｕｂｌｅ－
Ｖｉｃｔｏｒｙ ✌✌ Ｓｉｇｎ Ｓｔｕｄｙ
— Ｕｎｉｖ．， Ｉｎｃ．］♪
━━━━━━━━━━━
Ｑ．
Ｗｉｔｈ Ｓｐａｃｅｃｏｒｎ ａｓ ｔｈｅ
ｕｌｔｉｍａｔｅ ｃｏｒｐｏｒａｔｅ ｆｏｒｍ，
ａｎｄ ｗｉｔｈｏｕｔ ａｓｓｕｍｉｎｇ ａｎ ＩＰＯ
—ｅｖｅｎ ｉｆ ａｎ ＩＰＯ ｂｅｃｏｍｅｓ
ｐｏｓｓｉｂｌｅ， ｄｅｌｉｂｅｒａｔｅｌｙ
ｃｈｏｏｓｉｎｇ ｎｏｔ ｔｏ ｒｅｇａｒｄ ａｎ
ＩＰＯ ａｓ ｓｏｍｅｔｈｉｎｇ ｉｎｈｅｒｅｎｔｌｙ ｎｏｂｌｅ—ｉｆ ｔｈｅ ｍａｌｅ ｆｏｕｎｄｅｒ ｏｆ ｔｈｅ ｕｎｉｃｏｒｎ ｃｏｒｐｏｒａｔｉｏｎ Ｕｎｉｖ．， Ｉｎｃ．，
ａｎｄ ｔｈｅ ｆｅｍａｌｅ ｐａｒｔｎｅｒ ｗｈｏ
ｉｓ ｔｈｅ Ｐｒｅｓｉｄｅｎｔ’ｓ ｃｏｍｐａｎｉｏｎ， ｒｅｓｐｅｃｔｅｄ ｆｒｉｅｎｄ， ａｌｌｙ，
ａｎｄ ｐａｒｔｎｅｒ ｉｎ ｓｏｌｉｄａｒｉｔｙ—
ｈｏｌｄ ｔｈｅ ｓｏ－ｃａｌｌｅｄ
① ｓｈａｒｅ ｃａｒｒｙｉｎｇ ａ ｆｉｎａｌ
ｖｅｔｏ ｒｉｇｈｔ
＝ ｇｏｌｄｅｎ ｓｈａｒｅ
＝ Ｇｏｌｄｅｎ Ｓｈａｒｅ
ａｎｄ
② ｄｕａｌ－ｃｌａｓｓ ｓｈａｒｅｓ
ｃａｒｒｙｉｎｇ， ｆｏｒ ｅｘａｍｐｌｅ，
ｔｅｎ ｖｏｔｅｓ ｐｅｒ ｓｈａｒｅ，
ｃｏｕｌｄ ｙｏｕ ｑｕｉｔｅ ｂｒｉｅｆｌｙ
ｅｘｐｌａｉｎ ｔｈｅ “ｅｓｔｉｍａｔｅｄ ｂｅｓｔ ｓｈａｒｅｈｏｌｄｉｎｇ ｒａｔｉｏ ｌｅａｓｔ
ｌｉｋｅｌｙ ｔｏ ｃａｕｓｅ ｄｉｓｐｕｔｅｓ”
ａｎｄ “ｔｈｅ ｒｅａｓｏｎｓ ｆｏｒ ｉｔ”？♪
※ Ｆｕｒｔｈｅｒｍｏｒｅ， ｗｉｔｈ ｃｏｒｐｏｒａｔｅ ｌａｗｙｅｒｓ ｗｈｏ ａｒｅ ｑｕａｌｉｆｉｅｄ ｎｏｔ ｏｎｌｙ ｉｎ Ｊａｐａｎ ｂｕｔ ａｌｓｏ ｉｎ ｔｈｅ Ｕ．Ｓ． ｓｔａｔｅｓ ｏｆ Ｃａｌｉｆｏｒｎｉａ ａｎｄ Ｎｅｗ Ｙｏｒｋ，
ｗｏｕｌｄ ａ ｓｔｒｕｃｔｕｒｅ ｕｎｄｅｒ
ｗｈｉｃｈ １００％ ｏｆ ｔｈｅ ｎｅｗｌｙ ｉｓｓｕｅｄ ｓｈａｒｅｓ ｏｆｆｅｒｅｄ ｔｏ Ｊａｐａｎｅｓｅ ａｎｄ Ｕ．Ｓ． ｓｈａｒｅｈｏｌｄｅｒｓ—ｌａｄｉｅｓ ａｎｄ ｇｅｎｔｌｅｍｅｎ ｗｈｏ ａｓｓｉｓｔ ｕｓ ｗｉｔｈ ｎｅｗ－ｓｈａｒｅ ｅｑｕｉｔｙ ｆｉｎａｎｃｉｎｇ—
ａｒｅ “ｒｅｓｔｒｉｃｔｅｄ－ｖｏｔｉｎｇ
ｓｈａｒｅｓ” ｃａｒｒｙｉｎｇ ｌｅｇｉｔｉｍａｔｅ ｂｅｎｅｆｉｔｓ ｃｏｍｍｅｎｓｕｒａｔｅ
ｗｉｔｈ ｔｈｅｉｒ ｉｎｖｅｓｔｍｅｎｔ ｂｅ
ａｎ ｕｎｒｅａｓｏｎａｂｌｅ ｐｒｏｐｏｓｉｔｉｏｎ？
Ｗｅｌｌ， ｏｂｊｅｃｔｉｖｅｌｙ ｓｐｅａｋｉｎｇ， Ｉ ｓｕｐｐｏｓｅ ｔｈａｔ ｗｏｕｌｄ ｄｅｐｅｎｄ ｏｎ ｔｈｅ ｂｅｎｅｆｉｔｓ ｏｆｆｅｒｅｄ．
Ｉｆ ｔｈｅｙ ｉｎｓｉｓｔ ｔｈａｔ ｔｈｅ ｎｅｗｌｙ ｉｓｓｕｅｄ ｓｈａｒｅｓ ｍｕｓｔ ｃａｒｒｙ ｖｏｔｉｎｇ ｒｉｇｈｔｓ， ｗｅ ｗｏｕｌｄ ｃｏｎｓｉｄｅｒ ｇｒａｎｔｉｎｇ ｓｏｍｅ ｖｏｔｉｎｇ ｒｉｇｈｔｓ，
ｐｒｏｖｉｄｅｄ ｔｈａｔ ｔｈｅｙ ｒｅｍａｉｎ ｗｉｔｈｉｎ ａ ｒａｎｇｅ ｔｈａｔ ｗｏｕｌｄ ｎｏｔ ａｄｖｅｒｓｅｌｙ ａｆｆｅｃｔ ｔｈｅ ｃｏｍｐａｎｙ’ｓ ｓｔａｂｌｅ ｇｒｏｗｔｈ ａｎｄ ｐｒｏｓｐｅｒｉｔｙ．
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Ａ．
Ｉｎ ｃｏｎｃｌｕｓｉｏｎ， ｉｆ ｔｈｅ ｃｏｍｐａｎｙ ｉｓ ｔｏ ｒｅｍａｉｎ ｐｒｉｖａｔｅｌｙ ｈｅｌｄ ａｎｄ ｓｕｂｊｅｃｔ ｔｏ ｓｈａｒｅ－ｔｒａｎｓｆｅｒ ｒｅｓｔｒｉｃｔｉｏｎｓ， ｔｈｅ ｅｓｔｉｍａｔｅｄ ｓｔｒｕｃｔｕｒｅ ｗｏｕｌｄ ｂｅ ａｓ ｆｏｌｌｏｗｓ．
Ｅｓｔｉｍａｔｅｄ Ｓｈａｒｅｈｏｌｄｉｎｇ Ｒａｔｉｏ Ｌｅａｓｔ Ｌｉｋｅｌｙ ｔｏ Ｃａｕｓｅ Ｄｉｓｐｕｔｅｓ
Ｍａｌｅ ｆｏｕｎｄｅｒ： ３４％ — ｍａｎａｇｅｍｅｎｔ ｃｏｎｔｒｏｌ ｐｌｕｓ ｈｉｇｈ－ｖｏｔｉｎｇ ｓｈａｒｅｓ
Ｆｅｍａｌｅ ｐａｒｔｎｅｒ： １７％ — ｓｈａｒｅｓ ｃａｒｒｙｉｎｇ ｖｅｔｏ ｒｉｇｈｔｓ ｌｉｍｉｔｅｄ ｔｏ ｉｍｐｏｒｔａｎｔ ｍａｔｔｅｒｓ，
ｐｌｕｓ ｈｉｇｈ－ｖｏｔｉｎｇ ｓｈａｒｅｓ
Ｏｕｔｓｉｄｅ ｉｎｖｅｓｔｏｒｓ： ４９％ —
ｒｅｓｔｒｉｃｔｅｄ－ｖｏｔｉｎｇ ｓｈａｒｅｓ， ｉｎ ｐｒｉｎｃｉｐｌｅ
Ｂｅｃａｕｓｅ ｔｈｅ ｔｗｏ ｐａｒｔｎｅｒｓ
ｈｏｌｄ ａ ｃｏｍｂｉｎｅｄ ５１％， ｔｈｅ
ｆｏｕｎｄｅｒ ｓｉｄｅ ｒｅｔａｉｎｓ ａｎ
ｅｃｏｎｏｍｉｃ ｍａｊｏｒｉｔｙ．
Ｔｈｅ ｐｒｉｎｃｉｐａｌ ｒｅａｓｏｎ ｆｏｒ
ａｌｌｏｃａｔｉｎｇ ３４％ ｔｏ ｔｈｅ ｍａｌｅ
ｆｏｕｎｄｅｒ ａｎｄ １７％ ｔｏ ｔｈｅ ｆｅｍａ
ｌｅ ｐａｒｔｎｅｒ ｉｓ ｔｏ ａｖｏｉｄ ｔｈｅ
ｄｅａｄｌｏｃｋ ｔｈａｔ ｃａｎ ａｒｉｓｅ
ｆｒｏｍ ａ ｐｅｒｆｅｃｔｌｙ ｅｑｕａｌ ５０–５０ ｓｔｒｕｃｔｕｒｅ．
Ｈｏｗｅｖｅｒ， ｗｈａｔ ｍａｔｔｅｒｓ
ｍｏｓｔ ｉｓ ｎｏｔ ｔｈｅ ｐｅｒｃｅｎｔａｇｅｓ ｔｈｅｍｓｅｌｖｅｓ， ｂｕｔ ｔｈｅ
ｆｏｌｌｏｗｉｎｇ ａｒｒａｎｇｅｍｅｎｔｓ．
Ｄｏ ｎｏｔ ｇｉｖｅ ｅａｃｈ ｐａｒｔｎｅｒ
ｏｎｅ ｇｏｌｄｅｎ ｓｈａｒｅ ｃａｒｒｙｉｎｇ
ｉｄｅｎｔｉｃａｌ ｒｉｇｈｔｓ．
Ｔｈｉｓ ｃｏｕｌｄ ｃｒｅａｔｅ ｔｈｅ ｒｉｓｋ
ｏｆ ｐｅｒｍａｎｅｎｔ ｐａｒａｌｙｓｉｓ
ｗｈｅｎｅｖｅｒ ｅｉｔｈｅｒ ｐａｒｔｎｅｒ
ａｌｏｎｅ ｏｂｊｅｃｔｓ．
Ｌｉｍｉｔ ｔｈｅ ｆｅｍａｌｅ ｐａｒｔｎｅｒ’ｓ
ｖｅｔｏ ｒｉｇｈｔｓ ｔｏ ｍｅｒｇｅｒｓ，
ｔｈｅ ｓａｌｅ ｏｆ ｔｈｅ ｃｏｍｐａｎｙ，
ｄｉｓｓｏｌｕｔｉｏｎ， ｆｕｎｄａｍｅｎｔａｌ
ｃｈａｎｇｅｓ ｔｏ ｔｈｅ ｃｏｍｐａｎｙ’ｓ
ｂｕｓｉｎｅｓｓ ｐｕｒｐｏｓｅｓ， ａｎｄ
ｓｉｍｉｌａｒ ｍａｔｔｅｒｓ．
Ｏｒｄｉｎａｒｙ ｂｕｄｇｅｔｓ， ｈｉｒｉｎｇ，
ｃｏｎｔｒａｃｔｓ， ａｎｄ ｆｉｎａｎｃｉｎｇ
ｓｈｏｕｌｄ ｒｅｍａｉｎ ｕｎｄｅｒ ｔｈｅ
Ｐｒｅｓｉｄｅｎｔ’ｓ ｌｅａｄｅｒｓｈｉｐ．
Ｓｐｅｃｉｆｙ ｉｎ ｔｈｅ ａｒｔｉｃｌｅｓ ｏｆ
ｉｎｃｏｒｐｏｒａｔｉｏｎ ａｎｄ
ｓｈａｒｅｈｏｌｄｅｒｓ’ ａｇｒｅｅｍｅｎｔ ｈｏｗ ｄｉｖｏｒｃｅ， ｄｅａｔｈ， ｌｏｓｓ ｏｆ
ｄｅｃｉｓｉｏｎ－ｍａｋｉｎｇ ｃａｐａｃｉｔｙ，
ｃｏｍｐｅｔｉｔｉｏｎ ｗｉｔｈ ｔｈｅ
ｃｏｍｐａｎｙ， ａｎｄ ｓｈａｒｅ
ｔｒａｎｓｆｅｒｓ ａｒｅ ｔｏ ｂｅ
ｈａｎｄｌｅｄ．
Ｆｏｕｎｄｅｒ ｓｈａｒｅｓ ｓｈｏｕｌｄ ｂｅ
ｓｕｂｊｅｃｔ ｔｏ ｔｒａｎｓｆｅｒ
ａｐｐｒｏｖａｌ，
ｒｉｇｈｔｓ ｏｆ ｆｉｒｓｔ ｒｅｆｕｓａｌ，
ｃｏｍｐｕｌｓｏｒｙ ｔｒａｎｓｆｅｒ
ｐｒｏｖｉｓｉｏｎｓ， ａｎｄ
ｃｏｎｄｉｔｉｏｎｓ ｆｏｒ ｃｏｎｖｅｒｓｉｏｎ
ｉｎｔｏ ｏｒｄｉｎａｒｙ ｓｈａｒｅｓ．
Ｆｕｒｔｈｅｒｍｏｒｅ， ｕｎｄｅｒ Ｊａｐａｎ’ｓ Ｃｏｍｐａｎｉｅｓ Ａｃｔ， ａ Ｕ．Ｓ．－
ｓｔｙｌｅ “ｔｅｎ ｖｏｔｅｓ ｐｅｒ ｓｈａｒｅ”
ａｒｒａｎｇｅｍｅｎｔ ｃａｎｎｏｔ ｂｅ
ｒｅｐｒｏｄｕｃｅｄ ｅｘａｃｔｌｙ ａｓ ｓｕｃｈ．
Ｉｎｓｔｅａｄ， ａｎ ｅｆｆｅｃｔｉｖｅ
ｄｉｓｐａｒｉｔｙ ｉｎ ｖｏｔｉｎｇ ｐｏｗｅｒ ｉｓ ｏｒｄｉｎａｒｉｌｙ ｃｒｅａｔｅｄ ｔｈｒｏｕｇｈ ｍｅｃｈａｎｉｓｍｓ ｓｕｃｈ ａｓ ａｓｓｉｇｎｉｎｇ ｄｉｆｆｅｒｅｎｔ ｓｈａｒｅ－ｕｎｉｔ ｎｕｍｂｅｒｓ ｔｏ ｄｉｆｆｅｒｅｎｔ ｃｌａｓｓｅｓ ｏｆ ｓｈａｒｅｓ．
Ｔｈｅ Ｔｏｋｙｏ Ｓｔｏｃｋ Ｅｘｃｈａｎｇｅ ａｌｓｏ ｐｒｏｖｉｄｅｓ ａｎ ｅｘａｍｐｌｅ ｉｎ ｗｈｉｃｈ ｓｈａｒｅｓ ｃａｒｒｙｉｎｇ ｇｒｅａｔｅｒ ｖｏｔｉｎｇ ｐｏｗｅｒ ｃｏｎｆｅｒ ｏｎｅ ｖｏｔｉｎｇ ｒｉｇｈｔ ｐｅｒ ５０ ｓｈａｒｅｓ，
ｗｈｉｌｅ ｓｈａｒｅｓ ｃａｒｒｙｉｎｇ ｌｅｓｓ ｖｏｔｉｎｇ ｐｏｗｅｒ ｃｏｎｆｅｒ ｏｎｅ ｖｏｔｉｎｇ ｒｉｇｈｔ ｐｅｒ １００ ｓｈａｒｅｓ．
［Ｔｏｋｙｏ Ｓｔｏｃｋ Ｅｘｃｈａｎｇｅ —
２０２６ Ｇｒｏｗｔｈ Ｍａｒｋｅｔ Ｌｉｓｔｉｎｇ Ｇｕｉｄｅ］
https://t.co/cwJXBVZG1F
Ｐｒｏｐｏｓａｌ ｔｏ Ｍａｋｅ “１００％” ｏｆ
Ｉｎｖｅｓｔｏｒ Ｓｈａｒｅｓ Ｒｅｓｔｒｉｃｔｅｄ－Ｖｏｔｉｎｇ Ｓｈａｒｅｓ
Ｔｈｉｓ ｉｓ ｎｏｔ ａｎ ｕｎｒｅａｓｏｎａｂｌｅ ｐｒｏｐｏｓｉｔｉｏｎ． Ｆｏｒ ａ ｐｒｉｖａｔｅｌｙ ｈｅｌｄ ｃｏｍｐａｎｙ ｓｕｂｊｅｃｔ ｔｏ
ｓｈａｒｅ－ｔｒａｎｓｆｅｒ
ｒｅｓｔｒｉｃｔｉｏｎｓ， ｉｔ ｉｓ ａ
ｓｔｒｕｃｔｕｒｅ ｔｈａｔ ｃａｎ ｂｅ
ｅｎｔｉｒｅｌｙ ｖｉａｂｌｅ．
Ｈｅｒｅ， “１００％” ｍｅａｎｓ：
Ａｌｌ ｓｈａｒｅｓ ｎｅｗｌｙ ｉｓｓｕｅｄ ｔｏ
ｏｕｔｓｉｄｅ ｉｎｖｅｓｔｏｒｓ ｗｏｕｌｄ ｂｅ ｒｅｓｔｒｉｃｔｅｄ－ｖｏｔｉｎｇ ｓｈａｒｅｓ．
Ｉｔ ｄｏｅｓ ｎｏｔ ｍｅａｎ ｔｈａｔ ｅｖｅｒｙ
ｓｈａｒｅ ｉｎ ｔｈｅ ｅｎｔｉｒｅ ｃｏｍｐａｎｙ ｗｏｕｌｄ ｂｅ ｎｏｎ－ｖｏｔｉｎｇ．
Ｈｏｗｅｖｅｒ， ｉｎｖｅｓｔｏｒｓ ｗｏｕｌｄ
ｎｅｅｄ ｅｃｏｎｏｍｉｃ ａｎｄ
ｃｏｎｔｒａｃｔｕａｌ ｂｅｎｅｆｉｔｓ ｉｎ
ｐｌａｃｅ ｏｆ ｖｏｔｉｎｇ ｒｉｇｈｔｓ．
Ｐｒｅｆｅｒｅｎｔｉａｌ ｄｉｖｉｄｅｎｄｓ
Ｐｒｅｆｅｒｅｎｔｉａｌ ｄｉｓｔｒｉｂｕｔｉｏｎ ｏｆ ｒｅｓｉｄｕａｌ ａｓｓｅｔｓ
Ｐａｒｔｉｃｉｐａｔｉｏｎ ｒｉｇｈｔｓ ｕｐｏｎ
ａ ｓａｌｅ ｏｆ ｔｈｅ ｃｏｍｐａｎｙ
Ａｎｔｉ－ｄｉｌｕｔｉｏｎ ｐｒｏｖｉｓｉｏｎｓ
Ｉｎｆｏｒｍａｔｉｏｎ ｒｉｇｈｔｓ ａｎｄ
ｐｅｒｉｏｄｉｃ ｒｅｐｏｒｔｉｎｇ
Ｂｏａｒｄ－ｏｂｓｅｒｖｅｒ ｒｉｇｈｔｓ
Ｃｏｎｓｅｎｔ ｒｉｇｈｔｓ ｌｉｍｉｔｅｄ ｔｏ
ｃｅｒｔａｉｎ ｍａｊｏｒ ｍａｔｔｅｒｓ
Ｒｅｄｅｍｐｔｉｏｎ ｒｉｇｈｔｓ ｏｒ
ｃｏｎｖｅｒｓｉｏｎ ｒｉｇｈｔｓ ｉｎｔｏ
ｏｒｄｉｎａｒｙ ｓｈａｒｅｓ
Ａｃｃｏｒｄｉｎｇｌｙ， ｔｈｅ ｍｏｓｔ
ａｃｃｅｐｔａｂｌｅ ｆｏｒｍｕｌａｔｉｏｎ
ｗｏｕｌｄ ｂｅ：
Ｍａｎａｇｅｍｅｎｔ ｃｏｎｔｒｏｌ ｓｈａｌｌ
ｒｅｍａｉｎ ｒｅｓｅｒｖｅｄ ｔｏ ｔｈｅ
ｆｏｕｎｄｅｒ ｓｉｄｅ，
ｗｈｉｌｅ ｏｕｔｓｉｄｅ ｉｎｖｅｓｔｏｒｓ ｓｈａｌｌ ｂｅ ｇｒａｎｔｅｄ ｐｒｅｆｅｒｅｎｔｉａｌ
ｅｃｏｎｏｍｉｃ ｒｉｇｈｔｓ ａｎｄ ｌｉｍｉｔｅｄ ｐｒｏｔｅｃｔｉｖｅ ｒｉｇｈｔｓ
ｃｏｍｍｅｎｓｕｒａｔｅ ｗｉｔｈ ｔｈｅ
ａｍｏｕｎｔ ｉｎｖｅｓｔｅｄ ａｎｄ ｔｈｅ
ｒｉｓｋｓ ａｓｓｕｍｅｄ．
Ｏｎｅ ｐｏｉｎｔ ｒｅｑｕｉｒｉｎｇ ａｔｔｅｎｔｉｏｎ ｉｓ ｔｈａｔ， ｉｆ ｔｈｅ ｃｏｍｐａｎｙ ｌａｔｅｒ ｂｅｃｏｍｅｓ ａ “ｐｕｂｌｉｃ ｃｏｍｐａｎｙ” ｕｎｄｅｒ Ｊａｐａｎ’ｓ Ｃｏｍｐａｎｉｅｓ Ａｃｔ， ｉｔ ｗｉｌｌ ｂｅｃｏｍｅ ｓｕｂｊｅｃｔ ｔｏ ａ ｃｏｒｒｅｃｔｉｖｅ ｏｂｌｉｇａｔｉｏｎ ｉｆ ｒｅｓｔｒｉｃｔｅｄ－ｖｏｔｉｎｇ ｓｈａｒｅｓ ｅｘｃｅｅｄ ｏｎｅ－ｈａｌｆ ｏｆ ｔｈｅ ｔｏｔａｌ ｎｕｍｂｅｒ ｏｆ ｉｓｓｕｅｄ ｓｈａｒｅｓ．
Ｔｈｅ ｐｒｅｍｉｓｅ ｔｈａｔ ｔｈｅ ｃｏｍｐａｎｙ ｗｉｌｌ ｒｅｍａｉｎ ｐｒｉｖａｔｅｌｙ ｈｅｌｄ ａｎｄ ｓｕｂｊｅｃｔ ｔｏ ｓｈａｒｅ－ｔｒａｎｓｆｅｒ ｒｅｓｔｒｉｃｔｉｏｎｓ ｍｕｓｔ ｔｈｅｒｅｆｏｒｅ ｂｅ ｃｌｅａｒｌｙ ｅｓｔａｂｌｉｓｈｅｄ ｉｎ ｉｔｓ ａｒｔｉｃｌｅｓ ｏｆ ｉｎｃｏｒｐｏｒａｔｉｏｎ．
Ｅｖｅｎ ｕｎｄｅｒ ｓｔｏｃｋ－ｅｘｃｈａｎｇｅ ｌｉｓｔｉｎｇ ｓｙｓｔｅｍｓ， ｓｈａｒｅｓ ｗｉｔｈ ｄｉｆｆｅｒｅｎｔ ｖｏｔｉｎｇ ｒｉｇｈｔｓ ａｒｅ ｓｕｂｊｅｃｔ ｔｏ ｓｔｒｉｎｇｅｎｔ ｉｎｖｅｓｔｏｒ－ｐｒｏｔｅｃｔｉｏｎ ｒｅｓｔｒｉｃｔｉｏｎｓ．
Ｍｉｎｉｓｔｒｙ ｏｆ Ｊｕｓｔｉｃｅ — Ｏｕｔｌｉｎｅ ｏｆ ｔｈｅ Ｃｏｍｐａｎｉｅｓ Ａｃｔ Ｓｙｓｔｅｍ
https://t.co/e4rsQE3NZc
Ｔｏｋｙｏ Ｓｔｏｃｋ Ｅｘｃｈａｎｇｅ — Ｌｉｓｔｉｎｇ Ｅｘａｍｉｎａｔｉｏｎ Ｃｒｉｔｅｒｉａ
https://t.co/O4HivOsCx2
Ｔｈｅ ｆｉｎａｌ ｅｓｔｉｍａｔｅｄ ｓｔｒｕｃｔｕｒｅ ｉｓ ｔｈｅｒｅｆｏｒｅ：
Ｍａｌｅ ｆｏｕｎｄｅｒ： ３４％； ｆｅｍａｌｅ
ｐａｒｔｎｅｒ： １７％； ｏｕｔｓｉｄｅ
ｉｎｖｅｓｔｏｒｓ： ４９％．
Ｇｏｌｄｅｎ－ｓｈａｒｅ ｒｉｇｈｔｓ ｓｈｏｕｌｄ ｎｏｔ ｃｏｎｓｉｓｔ ｏｆ ｏｎｅ ｃｏｍｐｒｅｈｅｎｓｉｖｅ ｖｅｔｏ ｈｅｌｄ ｂｙ ｅａｃｈ ｐｅｒｓｏｎ， ｂｕｔ ｓｈｏｕｌｄ ｉｎｓｔｅａｄ ｂｅ
ｐｒｅｃｉｓｅｌｙ ｌｉｍｉｔｅｄ ｂｙ
ｓｕｂｊｅｃｔ ｍａｔｔｅｒ ａｎｄ ｃｏｎｄｉｔｉｏｎｓ．
Ｉｎｖｅｓｔｏｒ ｓｈａｒｅｓ ｓｈｏｕｌｄ， ｉｎ ｐｒｉｎｃｉｐｌｅ， ｃｏｎｓｉｓｔ ｅｎｔｉｒｅｌｙ ｏｆ ｒｅｓｔｒｉｃｔｅｄ－ｖｏｔｉｎｇ ｐｒｅｆｅｒｒｅｄ ｓｈａｒｅｓ．
Ｔｈｉｓ ｗｏｕｌｄ ｂｅ ａ ｃｏｍｐａｒａｔｉｖｅｌｙ ｓｔａｂｌｅ ｓｔｒｕｃｔｕｒｅ．
Ｗｈｅｎ ｔｈｅ ｓｈａｒｅｓ ａｒｅ ａｃｔｕａｌｌｙ ｉｓｓｕｅｄ， ｔｈｅ ａｒｒａｎｇｅｍｅｎｔ ｍｕｓｔ ｂｅ ｉｎｄｉｖｉｄｕａｌｌｙ ｓｔｒｕｃｔｕｒｅｄ ｂｙ Ｊａｐａｎｅｓｅ ａｔｔｏｒｎｅｙｓ ｒｅｓｐｏｎｓｉｂｌｅ ｆｏｒ ｔｈｅ Ｃｏｍｐａｎｉｅｓ Ａｃｔ ａｎｄ ｔｈｅ Ｆｉｎａｎｃｉａｌ Ｉｎｓｔｒｕｍｅｎｔｓ ａｎｄ Ｅｘｃｈａｎｇｅ Ａｃｔ， ａｓ ｗｅｌｌ ａｓ Ｕ．Ｓ． ｓｅｃｕｒｉｔｉｅｓ－ｌａｗ ａｔｔｏｒｎｅｙｓ ｉｆ Ｕ．Ｓ． ｉｎｖｅｓｔｏｒｓ ａｒｅ ｔｏ ｂｅ ｓｏｌｉｃｉｔｅｄ．
Ｑｕａｌｉｆｉｃａｔｉｏｎｓ ｉｎ ｂｏｔｈ Ｃａｌｉｆｏｒｎｉａ ａｎｄ Ｎｅｗ Ｙｏｒｋ ｗｏｕｌｄ ｂｅ ｖａｌｕａｂｌｅ， ｂｕｔ ｔｈｅ ｌａｗｙｅｒｓ’ ａｂｉｌｉｔｙ ｔｏ ａｄｄｒｅｓｓ ｔｈｅ ｓｔａｔｅ ｒｅｇｉｓｔｒａｔｉｏｎｓ ａｎｄ ｓｅｃｕｒｉｔｉｅｓ ｒｅｇｕｌａｔｉｏｎｓ ｒｅｑｕｉｒｅｄ ｆｏｒ ｔｈｅ ｐａｒｔｉｃｕｌａｒ ｔｒａｎｓａｃｔｉｏｎ ｗｏｕｌｄ ｂｅ ｍｏｒｅ ｉｍｐｏｒｔａｎｔ．
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Ｑ．
Ｃｏｕｌｄ ｅｉｔｈｅｒ ｔｈｅ ｍａｌｅ ｐａｒｔｎｅｒ ａｎｄ Ｐｒｅｓｉｄｅｎｔ ｈｏｌｄｉｎｇ ３４％ ｏｒ ｔｈｅ ｆｅｍａｌｅ ｐａｒｔｎｅｒ ｈｏｌｄｉｎｇ １７％ ｂｅｔｒａｙ ｔｈｅ ｏｔｈｅｒ ｂｙ ｓｅｌｌｉｎｇ ｔｈｅｉｒ ｏｗｎ ｓｈａｒｅｓ ｗｉｔｈｏｕｔ ｐｅｒｍｉｓｓｉｏｎ ｆｏｒ ｔｈｅ ｐｕｒｐｏｓｅ ｏｆ ｏｂｔａｉｎｉｎｇ ａ ｄｉｖｏｒｃｅ？
Ｃｏｕｌｄ ｅｉｔｈｅｒ ｏｆ ｔｈｅｍ ｅｎｇｉｎｅｅｒ ｓｏｍｅ ｒｉｄｉｃｕｌｏｕｓ ｆａｍｉｌｙ－ｃｏｎｔｒｏｌ ｄｉｓｐｕｔｅ ａｎｄ ｔｒｙ ｔｏ ｅｘｔｒａｃｔ ａｐｐｒｏｘｉｍａｔｅｌｙ ｔｅｎ ｙｅａｒｓ’ ｗｏｒｔｈ ｏｆ ｃｏｍｐｅｎｓａｔｉｏｎ？ ＾＾；
Ｉｆ ｓｏ， ｃｏｕｌｄ ａ ｐｒｏｐｅｒ ａｄｖａｎｃｅ ａｒｒａｎｇｅｍｅｎｔ ｂｅ ｅｓｔａｂｌｉｓｈｅｄ ｔｏ ｅｎａｂｌｅ ｅａｃｈ ｐａｒｔｎｅｒ ｔｏ ｋｅｅｐ ｔｈｅ ｏｔｈｅｒ ｌｅｇｉｔｉｍａｔｅｌｙ ｉｎ ｃｈｅｃｋ？
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Ａ．
Ｙｅｓ．
Ｗｉｔｈｏｕｔ ａｒｒａｎｇｅｍｅｎｔｓ ｍａｄｅ ｉｎ ａｄｖａｎｃｅ， ａ ｓｈａｒｅｈｏｌｄｅｒ ｍａｙ ａｔ ｌｅａｓｔ ａｔｔｅｍｐｔ ｔｏ ｓｅｌｌ ｓｈａｒｅｓ ｈｅｌｄ ｉｎ ｔｈｅｉｒ ｏｗｎ ｎａｍｅ ｔｏ ａ ｔｈｉｒｄ ｐａｒｔｙ．
Ｉｔ ｉｓ ａｌｓｏ ｃｏｎｃｅｉｖａｂｌｅ ｔｈａｔ， ｄｕｒｉｎｇ ｄｉｖｏｒｃｅ ｎｅｇｏｔｉａｔｉｏｎｓ， ｔｈｅ ｓｈａｒｅｈｏｌｄｅｒ ｃｏｕｌｄ ｕｓｅ ｔｈｏｓｅ ｓｈａｒｅｓ ｏｒ ｖｅｔｏ ｒｉｇｈｔｓ ａｓ ｌｅｖｅｒａｇｅ ｔｏ ｄｅｍａｎｄ ａｎ ｅｘｏｒｂｉｔａｎｔ ｂｕｙｏｕｔ ｐｒｉｃｅ．
Ｈｏｗｅｖｅｒ， ｔｈｅｓｅ ｒｉｓｋｓ ｃａｎ ｂｅ ｐｒｅｖｅｎｔｅｄ ｔｏ ａ ｃｏｎｓｉｄｅｒａｂｌｅ ｅｘｔｅｎｔ ｔｈｒｏｕｇｈ ｔｈｅ ｆｏｌｌｏｗｉｎｇ “ｍｕｔｕａｌ－ｃｈｅｃｋ ｐａｃｋａｇｅ．”
Ｅｓｔｉｍａｔｅｄ Ｂｅｓｔ Ｓｔｒｕｃｔｕｒｅ
１．
Ｍａｋｅ ａｌｌ ｓｈａｒｅｓ ｓｕｂｊｅｃｔ ｔｏ ｔｒａｎｓｆｅｒ ｒｅｓｔｒｉｃｔｉｏｎｓ．
Ｎｅｉｔｈｅｒ ｔｈｅ ｍａｌｅ ｐａｒｔｎｅｒ ｎｏｒ ｔｈｅ ｆｅｍａｌｅ ｐａｒｔｎｅｒ ｗｏｕｌｄ ｂｅ ａｂｌｅ ｔｏ ａｄｍｉｔ ａ ｔｈｉｒｄ ｐａｒｔｙ ｆｏｒｍａｌｌｙ ｉｎｔｏ ｔｈｅ ｃｏｍｐａｎｙ ａｓ ａ ｓｈａｒｅｈｏｌｄｅｒ ｗｉｔｈｏｕｔ ｔｈｅ ｃｏｍｐａｎｙ’ｓ ａｐｐｒｏｖａｌ．
Ｔｈｅ ｌｅｇａｌ ｂａｓｉｓ ｉｓ ｆｏｕｎｄ ｉｎ Ａｒｔｉｃｌｅｓ １０７ ａｎｄ １３６ ｅｔ ｓｅｑ． ｏｆ ｔｈｅ Ｃｏｍｐａｎｉｅｓ Ａｃｔ．
Ｃｏｍｐａｎｉｅｓ Ａｃｔ — ｅ－Ｇｏｖ
https://t.co/qIFbV8jSlh
２．
Ｅｓｔａｂｌｉｓｈ ｍｕｔｕａｌ ｒｉｇｈｔｓ ｏｆ ｆｉｒｓｔ ｒｅｆｕｓａｌ．
Ｂｅｆｏｒｅ ｓｅｌｌｉｎｇ ｓｈａｒｅｓ ｔｏ ａ ｔｈｉｒｄ ｐａｒｔｙ， ｔｈｅ ｓｅｌｌｉｎｇ ｓｈａｒｅｈｏｌｄｅｒ ｍｕｓｔ ｆｉｒｓｔ ｏｆｆｅｒ ｔｈｅｍ ｔｏ ｔｈｅ ｏｔｈｅｒ ｐａｒｔｎｅｒ ｏｒ ｔｈｅ ｃｏｍｐａｎｙ ｏｎ ｔｈｅ ｓａｍｅ ｔｅｒｍｓ．
３．
Ｄｅｓｉｇｎａｔｅ ｔｈｅ ｃｏｍｍｅｎｃｅｍｅｎｔ ｏｆ ｄｉｖｏｒｃｅ ｎｅｇｏｔｉａｔｉｏｎｓ， ｓｅｐａｒａｔｉｏｎ， ｃｏｍｐｅｔｉｔｉｏｎ ｗｉｔｈ ｔｈｅ ｃｏｍｐａｎｙ， ａｎｄ ｍａｔｅｒｉａｌ ｂｒｅａｃｈｅｓ ｏｆ ｔｒｕｓｔ ａｓ ｔｒｉｇｇｅｒｉｎｇ ｅｖｅｎｔｓ．
Ｕｐｏｎ ｔｈｅ ｏｃｃｕｒｒｅｎｃｅ ｏｆ ｓｕｃｈ ａｎ ｅｖｅｎｔ， ａ ｓｔｒｕｃｔｕｒｅ ｓｈｏｕｌｄ ｂｅ ｃｏｎｓｉｄｅｒｅｄ ｕｎｄｅｒ ｗｈｉｃｈ ｈｉｇｈ－ｖｏｔｉｎｇ ｓｈａｒｅｓ ａｎｄ ｇｏｌｄｅｎ ｓｈａｒｅｓ ａｕｔｏｍａｔｉｃａｌｌｙ ｃｏｎｖｅｒｔ ｉｎｔｏ ｏｒｄｉｎａｒｙ ｓｈａｒｅｓ ｏｒ ｒｅｓｔｒｉｃｔｅｄ－ｖｏｔｉｎｇ ｓｈａｒｅｓ．
４．
Ｍａｋｅ ｇｏｌｄｅｎ ｓｈａｒｅｓ ｎｏｎ－ｔｒａｎｓｆｅｒａｂｌｅ．
Ｅｓｔａｂｌｉｓｈ ａｃｑｕｉｓｉｔｉｏｎ ｐｒｏｖｉｓｉｏｎｓ ｕｎｄｅｒ ｗｈｉｃｈ ｔｈｅ ｃｏｍｐａｎｙ ａｃｑｕｉｒｅｓ ａｎｄ ｃａｎｃｅｌｓ ｔｈｅ ｇｏｌｄｅｎ ｓｈａｒｅ ｉｆ ｉｔ ｉｓ ｔｒａｎｓｆｅｒｒｅｄ ｔｏ ａｎｙｏｎｅ ｏｔｈｅｒ ｔｈａｎ ｔｈｅ ｄｅｓｉｇｎａｔｅｄ ｈｏｌｄｅｒ， ｏｒ ｕｐｏｎ ｔｈｅ ｈｏｌｄｅｒ’ｓ ｄｅａｔｈ， ｒｅｓｉｇｎａｔｉｏｎ ａｓｓｏｃｉａｔｅｄ ｗｉｔｈ ｄｉｖｏｒｃｅ， ｏｒ ａｎｏｔｈｅｒ ｓｐｅｃｉｆｉｅｄ ｅｖｅｎｔ．
５．
Ｅｓｔａｂｌｉｓｈ ａｎ ｏｂｊｅｃｔｉｖｅ ｂｕｙｏｕｔ ｐｒｉｃｅ ｉｎ ａｄｖａｎｃｅ．
Ｕｓｅ ｓｔａｎｄａｒｄｓ ｓｕｃｈ ａｓ “ｔｈｅ ｐｒｉｃｅ ｐａｉｄ ｉｎ ｔｈｅ ｍｏｓｔ ｒｅｃｅｎｔ ｔｈｉｒｄ－ｐａｒｔｙ ｆｉｎａｎｃｉｎｇ ｒｏｕｎｄ” ｏｒ “ｆａｉｒ ｖａｌｕｅ ｄｅｔｅｒｍｉｎｅｄ ｂｙ ａｎ ｉｎｄｅｐｅｎｄｅｎｔ ｖａｌｕａｔｉｏｎ ｆｉｒｍ．”
Ｔｈｉｓ ｗｏｕｌｄ ｐｒｅｖｅｎｔ ｅｉｔｈｅｒ ｐａｒｔｙ ｆｒｏｍ ａｒｂｉｔｒａｒｉｌｙ ｄｅｍａｎｄｉｎｇ， ｍｅｒｅｌｙ ａｓ ａ ｆｏｒｍ ｏｆ ｈａｒａｓｓｍｅｎｔ， ｓｏｍｅｔｈｉｎｇ ｓｕｃｈ ａｓ “ｔｅｎ ｙｅａｒｓ’ ｗｏｒｔｈ ｏｆ ｃｏｍｐｅｎｓａｔｉｏｎ．”
６．
Ｅｓｔａｂｌｉｓｈ ｄｅａｄｌｏｃｋ－ｒｅｓｏｌｕｔｉｏｎ ｐｒｏｖｉｓｉｏｎｓ．
Ｕｓｅ ａ ｓｔａｇｅｄ ｐｒｏｃｅｓｓ ｃｏｎｓｉｓｔｉｎｇ ｏｆ ｎｅｇｏｔｉａｔｉｏｎｓ， ｆｏｌｌｏｗｅｄ ｂｙ ｍｅｄｉａｔｉｏｎ ｂｙ ａｎ ｉｎｄｅｐｅｎｄｅｎｔ ｐｒｏｆｅｓｓｉｏｎａｌ， ａｎｄ ｔｈｅｎ ａ ｂｕｙｏｕｔ ａｆｔｅｒ ａ ｓｐｅｃｉｆｉｅｄ ｐｅｒｉｏｄ．
Ｔｈｅ ｍａｔｔｅｒｓ ｓｕｂｊｅｃｔ ｔｏ ｖｅｔｏ ｒｉｇｈｔｓ ｓｈｏｕｌｄ ｂｅ ｌｉｍｉｔｅｄ ｓｏ ｔｈａｔ ｏｒｄｉｎａｒｙ ｂｕｓｉｎｅｓｓ ｏｐｅｒａｔｉｏｎｓ ｃａｎｎｏｔ ｂｅ ｈａｌｔｅｄ ｂｙ ｔｈｅ ｇｏｌｄｅｎ ｓｈａｒｅ．
７．
Ｃｒｅａｔｅ ａｎ ａｇｒｅｅｍｅｎｔ ｔｈａｔ ｔｒｅａｔｓ ｔｈｅ ｓｈａｒｅｓ ｓｅｐａｒａｔｅｌｙ ｆｒｏｍ ｔｈｅ ｄｉｖｏｒｃｅ ｉｔｓｅｌｆ．
Ａ ｓｈａｒｅｈｏｌｄｅｒｓ’ ａｇｒｅｅｍｅｎｔ， ｐｒｅｎｕｐｔｉａｌ ａｇｒｅｅｍｅｎｔ， ｏｒ ｍａｒｉｔａｌ ｐｒｏｐｅｒｔｙ ａｇｒｅｅｍｅｎｔ ｓｈｏｕｌｄ ｅｓｔａｂｌｉｓｈ ａ ｐｏｌｉｃｙ ｕｎｄｅｒ ｗｈｉｃｈ ａｎｙ ｎｅｃｅｓｓａｒｙ ｓｅｔｔｌｅｍｅｎｔ ｉｓ ｍａｄｅ ｍｏｎｅｔａｒｉｌｙ， ｒａｔｈｅｒ ｔｈａｎ ｂｙ ｔｒａｎｓｆｅｒｒｉｎｇ ｔｈｅ ｃｏｍｐａｎｙ ｓｈａｒｅｓ ｔｈｅｍｓｅｌｖｅｓ．
Ｈｏｗｅｖｅｒ， ｉｔ ｉｓ ｎｏｔ ｐｏｓｓｉｂｌｅ ｔｏ ｅｘｃｌｕｄｅ ｃｏｍｐｌｅｔｅｌｙ ａ ｃｏｕｒｔ’ｓ ｄｅｔｅｒｍｉｎａｔｉｏｎ ｒｅｇａｒｄｉｎｇ ｔｈｅ ｄｉｖｉｓｉｏｎ ｏｆ ｐｒｏｐｅｒｔｙ ｕｐｏｎ ｄｉｖｏｒｃｅ．
Ｍｏｓｔ Ｉｍｐｏｒｔａｎｔ Ｐｏｉｎｔ
Ａ ｐｒｏｖｉｓｉｏｎ ｕｎｄｅｒ ｗｈｉｃｈ ｔｈｅ ｓｈａｒｅｓ ａｒｅ ｃｏｎｆｉｓｃａｔｅｄ ｏｒ ｃｏｍｐｕｌｓｏｒｉｌｙ ａｃｑｕｉｒｅｄ ａｔ ａ ｇｒｏｓｓｌｙ ｄｉｓｃｏｕｎｔｅｄ ｐｒｉｃｅ ｍｅｒｅｌｙ ｂｅｃａｕｓｅ ｏｎｅ ｐａｒｔｎｅｒ ｈａｓ ｒｅｑｕｅｓｔｅｄ ａ ｄｉｖｏｒｃｅ ｃｏｕｌｄ ｂｅ ｈｅｌｄ ｉｎｖａｌｉｄ， ｃｏｎｔｒａｒｙ ｔｏ ｐｕｂｌｉｃ ｐｏｌｉｃｙ， ｏｒ ｃｏｕｌｄ ｌｅａｄ ｔｏ ａ ｄｉｓｐｕｔｅ ｏｖｅｒ ｖａｌｕａｔｉｏｎ．
Ａｃｃｏｒｄｉｎｇｌｙ， ｔｈｅ ａｒｒａｎｇｅｍｅｎｔ ｓｈｏｕｌｄ ｎｏｔ ｂｅ：
Ｄｉｖｏｒｃｅ ＝ ｃｏｎｆｉｓｃａｔｉｏｎ
ｂｕｔ ｉｎｓｔｅａｄ：
Ｄｉｖｏｒｃｅ， ｅｔｃ． ＝ ｅｘｐｉｒａｔｉｏｎ ｏｒ ｃｏｎｖｅｒｓｉｏｎ ｏｆ ｔｈｅ ｇｏｌｄｅｎ ｓｈａｒｅ ａｎｄ ｈｉｇｈ－ｖｏｔｉｎｇ ｒｉｇｈｔｓ， ｗｈｉｌｅ ｔｈｅ ｅｃｏｎｏｍｉｃ ｓｈａｒｅｓ ａｒｅ ｐｕｒｃｈａｓｅｄ ａｔ ａ ｆａｉｒ ｐｒｉｃｅ．
Ｔｈｉｓ ｗｏｕｌｄ ｂｅ ｔｈｅ ｍｏｓｔ ｌｅｇｉｔｉｍａｔｅ ａｒｒａｎｇｅｍｅｎｔ ａｎｄ ｔｈｅ ｏｎｅ ｌｅａｓｔ ｌｉｋｅｌｙ ｔｏ ｃａｕｓｅ ｄｉｓｐｕｔｅｓ．
Ｒａｔｈｅｒ ｔｈａｎ ｇｒａｎｔｉｎｇ ｃｏｍｐｒｅｈｅｎｓｉｖｅ ｇｏｌｄｅｎ ｓｈａｒｅｓ ｔｏ ｂｏｔｈ ｔｈｅ ｍａｌｅ ｐａｒｔｎｅｒ ｈｏｌｄｉｎｇ ３４％ ａｎｄ ｔｈｅ ｆｅｍａｌｅ ｐａｒｔｎｅｒ ｈｏｌｄｉｎｇ １７％，
ｉｔ ｗｏｕｌｄ ｂｅ ｓａｆｅｒ ｔｏ ｐｒｏｖｉｄｅ ｔｈａｔ ｏｒｄｉｎａｒｙ ｍａｎａｇｅｍｅｎｔ ｉｓ ｌｅｄ ｂｙ ｔｈｅ ｍａｌｅ ｐａｒｔｎｅｒ， ｗｈｉｌｅ ｏｎｌｙ ａ ｓｍａｌｌ ｎｕｍｂｅｒ ｏｆ ｍａｔｔｅｒｓ—ｓｕｃｈ ａｓ ｔｈｅ ｓａｌｅ ｏｒ ｄｉｓｓｏｌｕｔｉｏｎ ｏｆ ｔｈｅ ｃｏｍｐａｎｙ—ｒｅｑｕｉｒｅ ｂｏｔｈ ｐａｒｔｎｅｒｓ’ ｃｏｎｓｅｎｔ．
Ｔｈｅ ｆｏｕｒ ｌａｙｅｒｓ ｃｏｎｓｉｓｔｉｎｇ ｏｆ ｔｈｅ ａｒｔｉｃｌｅｓ ｏｆ ｉｎｃｏｒｐｏｒａｔｉｏｎ， ｔｈｅ ｔｅｒｍｓ ｏｆ ｅａｃｈ ｃｌａｓｓ ｏｆ ｓｈａｒｅｓ， ｔｈｅ ｓｈａｒｅｈｏｌｄｅｒｓ’ ａｇｒｅｅｍｅｎｔ， ａｎｄ ｔｈｅ ａｇｒｅｅｍｅｎｔ ｂｅｔｗｅｅｎ ｔｈｅ ｓｐｏｕｓｅｓ ｓｈｏｕｌｄ ｂｅ ｍａｄｅ ｍｕｔｕａｌｌｙ ｃｏｎｓｉｓｔｅｎｔ ｂｙ Ｊａｐａｎｅｓｅ ａｎｄ Ｕ．Ｓ． ｃｏｒｐｏｒａｔｅ ｌａｗｙｅｒｓ．
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
＃ＰａｙＰａｌＬｉｆｅｔｉｍｅＣｏｒｐｏｒａｔｅＰｅｎｓｉｏｎ
＃ＳｔｒｉｐｅＬｉｆｅｔｉｍｅＣｏｒｐｏｒａｔｅＰｅｎｓｉｏｎ
＃ＰａｙＰａｌＬｉｆｅｔｉｍｅＣｏｒｐｏｒａｔｅＰｅｎｓｉｏｎＰｌａｎ
＃ＳｔｒｉｐｅＬｉｆｅｔｉｍｅＣｏｒｐｏｒａｔｅＰｅｎｓｉｏｎＰｌａｎ
＃ＯｐｅｎＡＩＰｅｎｓｉｏｎ
＃ＧＰＴＰｅｎｓｉｏｎ
＃ＧｏｏｇｌｅＰｅｎｓｉｏｎ
＃ＧｅｍｉｎｉＰｅｎｓｉｏｎ
＃ＳｕｂｓｃｒｉｐｔｉｏｎＢａｓｅｄＩｎｄｅｐｅｎｄｅｎｔＬｉｆｅｔｉｍｅＣｏｒｐｏｒａｔｅＰｅｎｓｉｏｎＳｙｓｔｅｍ
＃ＬｉｆｅｔｉｍｅＣｏｒｐｏｒａｔｅＳｕｂｓｃｒｉｐｔｉｏｎＣａｓｈＦｌｏｗＳｅｃｕｒｉｔｙＳｙｓｔｅｍ
＃ＡＳＩＦｕｌｆｉｌｌｍｅｎｔＰｈｉｌｏｓｏｐｈｙＰｅｎｓｉｏｎ
＃ＡｒｔｉｆｉｃｉａｌＳｕｐｅｒｉｎｔｅｌｌｉｇｅｎｃｅＳｕｂｓｃｒｉｐｔｉｏｎＢａｓｅｄＣｏｒｐｏｒａｔｅＰｅｎｓｉｏｎ
＃ＵｎｉｃｏｒｎＣｏｒｐｏｒａｔｉｏｎ
＃ＤｅｃａｃｏｒｎＣｏｒｐｏｒａｔｉｏｎ
＃ＨｅｃｔｏｃｏｒｎＣｏｒｐｏｒａｔｉｏｎ
＃ＴｉｔａｎｃｏｒｎＣｏｒｐｏｒａｔｉｏｎ
＃ＧｉｇａｃｏｒｎＣｏｒｐｏｒａｔｉｏｎ
＃ＤｒａｇｏｎｃｏｒｎＣｏｒｐｏｒａｔｉｏｎ
＃ＯｍｅｇａｃｏｒｎＣｏｒｐｏｒａｔｉｏｎ
＃ＳｐａｃｅｃｏｒｎＣｏｒｐｏｒａｔｉｏｎ
Islam is a political movement, not a religion. Here’s what that means:
• Islam operates like a political system with Sharia as its constitution and Muslims as its citizenry
• Fully practicing Islamic doctrine leads to behavior incompatible with modern society and results in extremism
• Only 1% of America’s Muslim population being fully devout could represent around 50,000 potential terrorists
• Converts to Islam are more radicalized and more likely to embrace extremist views than those born into the cult
• The Quran calls non-Muslims infidels, and this concept is amplified during Infidel Awareness Month
...and leftist 👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇
• Islamic ideology rejects compromise and tolerance, much like Marxism does
The interest of Islam as a political system is antithetical to American interests.
https://t.co/rqhahjn6YM
#islamIsGenocide
@69News Turn the entire Middle East into glass.
Exactly. Whenever I tell my coworkers and students about the dumbass shit that Americans get upset about, they laugh because theyre genuinely confused. One of my students is gonna ask me about this because she's a big Aespa fan and I gotta be like "theyre stupid dont mind them".
Karina of K-Pop group Aespa was featured in a new Converse All-Stars ad for Asian markets. The American internet decided it was racist. The rest of the world said "stop looking at everything through racism colored glasses," "the whole world doesn't revolve around you, sheesh."
Today? My every day mood lmao
Today’s Mood
@TheBritishIntel One of the 5 pillars is enmity for non-Muslims. So basically these orgs are hypocritical with these statements. Statistically, I'm developing the perspective that every statement made by a practicing Muslim to a non-Muslim audience needs to be inspected for bad faith.
What could be better breakfast in bed and a coffee?! Early morning at the stables of course.. practicing non verbal control… GM ☕️ time for coffee and lunch
The lack of respect for Christianity is dangerous and alienates even non practicing Europeans. When men like the mayor of London who originate from another country desecrates our holy places while protecting their own religions it sends a message that Christianity and Christians are second class religions.
More churches are destroyed every year than mosques yet the government pays millions to protect mosques. We hear cries of Islamophobia when one mosque is attacked but ignore the hundreds of attacks on churches.
The west needs to embrace Christianity. Faith and belief should be the foundation of a strong society.
https://t.co/87NXIBnHIu
Maliq you are indoctrinated and have a skewed vision of reality.
It’s not the prayer we dislike but what is Associated with Islam.
Islam is not compatible with Western societies. Secular governance, individual liberty, equal citizenship, free speech, freedom of conscience, gender equality, Apostasy, status of non muslims (dhimmis)
And assiciated tax Jizya. Islams criminal punishment Hudud like stoning and the expansionist ideology with violence.
If they just came to our Nations in peace like Hindus, Sihks, buddhist,
Jews, Taoist, then you eould not be asking this question
The fact it is even asked is a sign you are not compatible compatible with western society or you are feeling the wests rejection of this ideology and are now practicing TAQIYYA.
Another reason to reject the religion of non peace.
@Ilerioluwa_Opad This is exactly why I just laugh whenever I see people getting upset when secular individuals criticize aspects of religion
If outsiders didn't push back, people would still be practicing dangerous absurdities in the name of divinity. Secularism saves religious and non-religious