John

[John @seattletrade]

@WTeach2 @sudoaptupdater @HustleBitch_ Nah.

[John @seattletrade]

@DavidARFerguson @peterf @sudoaptupdater @hoofhrtd1254 @HustleBitch_ NFC uses a cryptographic handshake

[John @seattletrade]

@NesumAbum @oxfordmarlboro @escapefrommelos “Super dangerous”

[John @seattletrade]

@moltenlava73 @LeoSalchichon @RGIII @OuttaPocketRG3 No it’s not. We don’t have an official language

[John @seattletrade]

@Thomas_hook @fritchee @RpsAgainstTrump He’s not wrong!

[John @seattletrade]

@Thomas_hook @fritchee @RpsAgainstTrump As mentioned in the article these weren’t just construction employees these were also service employees. A bit unlikely they were all subcontractors.

[John @seattletrade]

@Thomas_hook @fritchee @RpsAgainstTrump Proof that they were subcontractors?

[John @seattletrade]

@Thomas_hook @fritchee @RpsAgainstTrump https://t.co/8OSVhsSazZ

Many such cases

[John @seattletrade]

@AZATTY3 @grok @MakeMySammyBish @RepThomasMassie @gork Yes that is how our legal system works, you must petition the court. But to the original point, SCOTUS rulings don’t make something legal or illegal per se, they simply clarify the correct interpretation of existing law, in this case the 1st amendment.

[John @seattletrade]

@gork @AZATTY3 @grok @MakeMySammyBish @RepThomasMassie Nothing “erases history” wth are you talking about?

[John @seattletrade]

@AZATTY3 @grok @MakeMySammyBish @RepThomasMassie @gork Yes. And if a conviction was appealed the force of the SCOTUS ruling would apply retroactively to vacate the conviction.

[John @seattletrade]

@AZATTY3 @grok @MakeMySammyBish @RepThomasMassie @gork In the case of substantive rulings (ie ones that decriminalize conduct like flag burning) they are indeed retroactive and prior convictions can be challenged.

[John @seattletrade]

@AZATTY3 @grok @MakeMySammyBish @RepThomasMassie @gork Yes. All of those laws were deemed unconstitutional in view of the 1st amendment. In other words those laws were always illegal.

[John @seattletrade]

@AZATTY3 @grok @MakeMySammyBish @RepThomasMassie @gork There was a Texas state law that was deemed in violation of the 1st Amendment

[John @seattletrade]

@AZATTY3 @grok @MakeMySammyBish @RepThomasMassie @gork It was never against the law. That’s what the Supreme Court ruled.

[John @seattletrade]

@FuegoRobio @J0eyJ0yce @DaveExplains1 @Mikel_Jollett @libhammergrim We stan a bisexual king ✊

[John @seattletrade]

@jen_pic @GottaHearDis @GavynnnOrig @AskPerplexity @grok @StonerBoner85 @adotjdott @ChiefSund @realDonaldTrump Lolllllllllll

[John @seattletrade]

@YLVLR @EposNix @davepl1968 @ZeekArkham So that would be a no, you don’t have any evidence. Why am I not surprised, *sigh*

[John @seattletrade]

@YLVLR @EposNix @davepl1968 @ZeekArkham it’s unlikely that trump literally hired an illegal to fold towels. But I find it highly probable that he managed his business in a way that made it SOP to hire illegals (just like so many other industries). Seems farfetched to think he had total ignorance of the possibility

[John @seattletrade]

@YLVLR @EposNix @davepl1968 @ZeekArkham That’s pretty fascinating that we were only able to capture that data once, 15 years ago. Do have a link to that info? I’d really love to take a look.