La #IA puede ser una valiosa ayuda y, al mismo tiempo, exige un enfoque prudente y cauteloso. La velocidad y la sencillez con la que es posible obtener formas de asistencia concreta simplifican nuestras vidas, pero también pueden acostumbrarnos a delegar demasiado y a buscar respuestas rápidas, debilitando el juicio personal y la creatividad. #MagnificaHumanitas
Hana dreams of becoming an ace mail carrier like her hero, Dragonite 🧡 When she finds a letter with no address, she sets off to locate the mystery sender! ✉️
🔗 Watch “Pokémon: Dragonite and the Special Delivery” on YouTube: https://t.co/s9TdVFoq8c
✨ GIVEAWAY 🎮
To celebrate the mobile release of Sea of Stars, we’re giving away five Backbone Pro controllers!
1. Follow @seaofstarsgame
2. Like & share this post
3. Tag a mobile gamer you’d recommend the game to!
What’s Your Favorite? 💛
Lady Gaga, Trevor Noah, Jisoo, Charles Leclerc, Lamine Yamal, Maitreyi Ramakrishnan, and Young Miko share their favorite Pokémon to kick off #Pokemon30!
Join the celebration: https://t.co/YRWJlOl1bF
Sea of Stars is coming to mobile on April 7th!
One low price, no ads, and no microtransactions.
We look forward to our little adventure meeting new players everywhere! A huge thanks to @Playdigious for this adaptation.
Pre-orders are now open at a 10% discount!
AppStore: https://t.co/Q0h5Icp7ZO
Google Play: https://t.co/lENSEF2OBN
Así ASESINÓ la narcotiranía de Nicolás Maduro a Neomar Lander en 2017, joven de 17 años. Su frase “La lucha de pocos vale por el futuro de muchos” hace parte de la historia de Venezuela. Por esto no hay que tener piedad con Maduro y su combo.
¡Neomar tu muerte no fue en vano 🇻🇪!
This paper from Harvard and MIT quietly answers the most important AI question nobody benchmarks properly:
Can LLMs actually discover science, or are they just good at talking about it?
The paper is called “Evaluating Large Language Models in Scientific Discovery”, and instead of asking models trivia questions, it tests something much harder:
Can models form hypotheses, design experiments, interpret results, and update beliefs like real scientists?
Here’s what the authors did differently 👇
• They evaluate LLMs across the full discovery loop hypothesis → experiment → observation → revision
• Tasks span biology, chemistry, and physics, not toy puzzles
• Models must work with incomplete data, noisy results, and false leads
• Success is measured by scientific progress, not fluency or confidence
What they found is sobering.
LLMs are decent at suggesting hypotheses, but brittle at everything that follows.
✓ They overfit to surface patterns
✓ They struggle to abandon bad hypotheses even when evidence contradicts them
✓ They confuse correlation for causation
✓ They hallucinate explanations when experiments fail
✓ They optimize for plausibility, not truth
Most striking result:
`High benchmark scores do not correlate with scientific discovery ability.`
Some top models that dominate standard reasoning tests completely fail when forced to run iterative experiments and update theories.
Why this matters:
Real science is not one-shot reasoning.
It’s feedback, failure, revision, and restraint.
LLMs today:
• Talk like scientists
• Write like scientists
• But don’t think like scientists yet
The paper’s core takeaway:
Scientific intelligence is not language intelligence.
It requires memory, hypothesis tracking, causal reasoning, and the ability to say “I was wrong.”
Until models can reliably do that, claims about “AI scientists” are mostly premature.
This paper doesn’t hype AI. It defines the gap we still need to close.
And that’s exactly why it’s important.
If you want to have your mind blown, this character was written as someone for the viewer to hate.
Yet literally everything she predicts has come to pass.