"I didn't have any doubts."
The lone holdout juror in Lindsay Clancy's murder trial is speaking publicly for the first time, disputing fellow jurors who claimed he acknowledged reasonable doubt before refusing to join the other 11 in finding her not guilty by reason of insanity.
Michael P. Desronvil says he believed prosecutors presented enough evidence to show Clancy "knew exactly what she was doing and planned" the killings. The jury ultimately deadlocked 11-1, resulting in a mistrial.
Clancy is due back in court Sept. 29 as prosecutors weigh whether to retry the case.
Read his full statement: https://t.co/nW8aODQQEP
Room full of women on the Oprah show starts cheering after a doctor says that black female child murderers need to be supported too, not just the white child murderers like Lindsay Clancy.
"I want us to have the same passion for [female child murderers] who don't look like Lindsay."
"There are women of color sitting around this country in prisons for [murdering their children]. I just wanna remind us to have the pink shirts and the energy for them as well."
Totally insane.
Justice should be based on evidence and the law, not emotion or public pressure. The innocent children deserve truth, accountability, and a fair legal process
A juror should never be pressured into abandoning an honest judgment. Follow the evidence, respect the process, and keep the pursuit of justice focused on the children
๐ฅ๐จ BREAKING โ The female jurors' reactions are now going viral after Lindsay Clancy's Mistrial.
Female jurors were FUMING over the lone male holdout juror for not acquitting Lindsay Clancy.
"One female juror would NOT even OPEN her eyes. Her eyes were gazed down and CLOSED."
"Another female juror was pursing her lipsโclenched her hands into fists."
"One female juror was nodding her head 'NO 'โall the jurors were extremely intense."
๐จ Nancy Mace ๐จ has weighed into the Lindsay Clancy case with a stark warning: โIf postpartum mental illness becomes a get-out-of-jail-free card for m*rdering your children, then by logic, anyone diagnosed with it should lose custody of their kids.โ Her comments come as Clancyโs Massachusetts m*rder trial remains unresolved, with jurors still deliberating over whether she was criminally responsible when she k*lled her three young children in January 2023.
Clancyโs defense argues she was suffering from postpartum psychosis and was unable to control her actions, while prosecutors contend she understood what she was doing and deliberately planned the killings. Postpartum psychosis is a rare but severe psychiatric condition that can involve hallucinations, delusions and a profound loss of contact with reality.
Maceโs argument is that recognizing postpartum mental illness should not automatically remove accountability for k*lling a child. But critics of that position would point out that an insanity defense is not simply a blanket excuse based on having a diagnosis โ the legal question is whether the defendantโs mental illness left them criminally responsible for their actions at that specific time. That is exactly what the Clancy jury is being asked to decide.
And importantly, a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity would not necessarily mean Clancy simply โwalks free.โ She could instead be committed to a psychiatric facility, with her continued confinement subject to future evaluations. Whatever the verdict, this heartbreaking case has opened a much bigger conversation about accountability, postpartum psychiatric illness and whether America is doing enough to recognize and treat mothers experiencing severe mental-health crises before tragedy occurs.
Why do some women feel sympathy for Lindsay Clancy? "Rob Schmitt Tonight" producer Brent asked for the female perspective in NYC on the closely watched trial.
Pure liberal stupidity. For Godโs sake, she said she did it, to multiple people. Her attorney knows she did it. The jury knows she did it. In three years she has never said that she didnโt do it. Retarded liberal women? โShe didnโt do it โ
๐จ Lindsay Clancy brutally strangled her three children to death.
I never thought Iโd see the day hundreds of women would bring their own children to rally for the release of a woman who killed hers.
Honestly, I donโt know where we go from here.
This is horrifying to witness.
Breaking news: A judge declared a mistrial in the case of Lindsay Clancy, after jurors were unable to come to an agreement about whether to accept her insanity plea to murder charges.
Read more: https://t.co/1Ac0uVsUlX
๐จ๐จ๐จ **He lined them up and shot them. She timed it and strangled them. He got three life sentences. She got a movement. Thatโs the double standard.**โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
๐Chad Doerman shot his three sonsโ7, 4, and 3โin their home. Lined them up. Hunted the one who ran. Told them they were the best boys ever, then killed them. Said he did it for God. Three consecutive life sentences. No parade of supporters calling him a victim.
๐Lindsay Clancy strangled her three kidsโ5, 3, and 8 monthsโwith exercise bands after sending her husband out on a timed errand. Jumped out a window. Admits she did it. Women online: โI could have been her.โ GoFundMe in the hundreds of thousands. Sheโs the one who needs understanding.
๐Same number of dead children. Same year. One gets a cage until he dies. The other gets a movement. Thatโs the split. The kids are still dead either way.
Maybe Iโm the asshole here, but somebody explain this to me.
How the FCK is a jury deadlocked over a woman killing her three children?
At some point, we have to stop making the simplest facts complicated.
Three children went into that house alive.
Their mother strangled them.
Three separate children. Three separate acts.
And now twelve people are sitting on their asses in a room unable to agree on whether she should be held criminally responsible?
What exactly are we debating?
There has to be a line somewhere.
If deliberately killing your own three children doesnโt cross it, then I genuinely donโt know where the hell that line is anymore.
Friggin ridiculous.