@kathyprojo I wasn't referring to your request . . . just stating that it is unlikely that the office of the Providence City Clerk has ever responded to any written request as they responded to you verbally. Their response to you was highly unusual.
Sorry to disappoint, but this is not a knee-jerk reaction. In my 3 years as Providence City Clerk, we never instructed someone who sought this type of record to file a formal APRA request, nor did we even consider such behavior. This is a deliberate abuse of the public's trust.
A total waste of time. This is the knee-jerk reaction we are seeing all the time, now. Public records are just that, and we (public and press) should not have to enter into what is essentially a form of litigation to get them.
Finally, this is another great example of how misbehavior hides behind the false belief that Providence City Council appointees are not independent. The City Clerk has full command and control of these records. They never need permission from another body to release them.
@kathyprojo Or even better, “Please provide copies of any emails from the City Clerk (or any of their staff) attaching Trade Name records during 2023.” It might provide evidence that your request was singled out for some mysterious reason.
Maybe @RIDOTNews should focus on fixing the roads without major delays instead of creating more gridlock with public records requests. https://t.co/aN8Kks6mXl
Great to be back in the RI State House with @gencitizen for #CivicsDayGC to hear our #StudentVoice and see all of the participating students and volunteers!
@DanMcGowan's piece from yesterday about talking with grownups about fixing Providence schools has been on my mind so much that I think he should start a monthly "Talking With Grownups About . . . " series. At a minimum you should catch the first edition: https://t.co/YAIuc4bWeh
@BillBartholomew@NewsProvidence@StephMachado After I notified the Mayor and City Council of this “accident,” the letter was edited. Mary Kay Harris and Christine West were removed and Carmen Castillo was added so his appointments correctly numbered five.
@BillBartholomew@NewsProvidence@StephMachado What a joke. Igliozzi couldn’t even write an appointment letter without violating the Charter. It named six members (he only is allowed five). The Acting City Clerk put the letter on the docket anyway.
14/14 But how do we want future Councils to behave? Do you think Appointees should be more politicized than they already are? Please vote NO on Local Question 7 and spread the word to PVD voters ahead of the election tomorrow!
1/14 I’ve been absent from Twitter all year, but I’m so concerned a proposed PVD Charter amendment is under voters' radar that I must ask:
Do you know why voting NO on Local Question 7 is so important to preserve the independence of Council appointees? (a thread for democracy)🧵
13/14 Council Appointees do serve the Council in many positive ways. But they aren't meant to be direct reports to the Council President as demanded by John Igliozzi today. Unfortunately, those illegal demands aren't publicly challenged by current Council Members who support him.