Senior Trender

Not an insider, just following open-source leads... | e-mail: [email protected]

[Senior Trender @seniortrender]

Noticed an concerning omission on the newly released UAP files. Page 17 of this document batch has a index filing form for a document called "Intelligence Requirements on Flying Saucer Type Aircraft" but lacks the actual document it references. Well I have previously found this actual document (albeit hard to locate).

https://t.co/IFQeR4spaJ

The document itself is one of the most revealing on the subject in my opinion as it seems to almost infer that they have possession of a craft based on the very specific details requested.

https://t.co/Dx2BDmOR9w

[Ben Schreckinger @SchreckReports]

NEW: I've unmasked "@whistlingmike,” the previously anonymous businessman who says he encountered a quiet, triangular craft hovering one night over public land in Kansas more than 20 years ago.

Mike says he's spent years developing a method to detect the craft and trying to reverse-engineer its revolutionary technology.

If true, Mike’s story could explain a large number of UFO sightings and rewrite the history of aviation.

I’ve also obtained a photo of a piece of raw material that Mike says is integral to the workings of the craft.

According to my sources, he left this material in the custody of the Senate intelligence committee for many months after presenting his claims to lawmakers and their staff.

Mike, whose full name is Michael Spicer, tells me that he's planning to unveil some of his findings next month at a series of presentations in Colorado.

Link in next tweet to read the full report and subscribe to PARADIGM's weekly briefing, Signs of Life

[Senior Trender @seniortrender]

https://t.co/7Nfxp0eb6d

[Dr. Dan @UAPDr]

🚨 Eric Davis just revealed where recovered alien bodies were taken.

The location: the Army Medical Museum, later known as the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, in Washington, D.C.

He says he has seen the records.

#UAP #UFOs #Disclosure

[Ben Schreckinger @SchreckReports]

REALITY SHOCK: A beginner's guide to UFOs, Aliens and Disclosure

Do you find the mass release of UFO files confusing?

Have you noticed that the federal government seems to be on the fence about whether aliens are regularly flying around in the skies above the Earth?

Are you curious why leaders in Congress keep expressing concerns that private military contractors may be hiding alien craft?

After spending the last decade at POLITICO — reporting on the rise of Donald Trump, Hunter Biden's business dealings, and tech policy — I spent much of the past year digging into the UFO flap.

The first result is Reality Shock, a deep-dive overview of a mystery that is enthralling growing cohorts across government, academia, business and culture.

Below you can find a link to the full piece, where you can also subscribe to follow the investigation as it develops.

But first, four initial takeaways:

1. The study of UFOs, and concern about them, have long been more serious than you’d think:

Scientists, intelligence analysts and senior military figures in the U.S. and allied nations have repeatedly concluded that the highest-quality UFO reports stem from real objects whose behavior defies apparent explanation.

Now, a new generation of UFO studies is starting to enter peer-reviewed academic journals.

2. While a case can be made for presuming that some UFOs really do represent one or more exotic phenomena, the available evidence that humans are retrieving and reverse-engineering alien craft is much weaker:

These extraordinary claims, made before Congress, have not been matched with equally extraordinary evidence.

At the same time, the serious concerns demonstrated by people with access to classified information about these claims signal a need for additional transparency and investigation.

3. The ongoing controversy presents a threat to the already-weakened legitimacy of many existing institutions:

The risks are twofold: One is the excessive mobilization of government, scientific, and philanthropic resources to explore claims that turn out to be nonsense.

The other is that alternative institutions discover, publicize and exploit the existence of non-human intelligence or other breakthroughs related to UFO anomalies while incumbents miss the boat.

4. The current UFO flap need not lead to proof of alien life to produce a major technological shock – or even a shock in our understanding of reality:

All of this clamor about UFOs could end up being about something other than non-human intelligence.

Persistent anomalies have often led to scientific paradigm shifts.

And some longtime observers of UFO anomalies speculate that militaries have already exploited secret scientific breakthroughs to develop mind-bending technologies.

Possible breakthroughs include new understandings of gravity or new aircraft propulsion systems far outside of known human capabilities.

To understand why these possibilities are being discussed, read on...

[Senior Trender @seniortrender]

@UnstblResearch All air force FOIA offices are brutal right now. Ive had a story ready to go pending an air force response going on half a year now 🙃

[Senior Trender @seniortrender]

@robjonesreports I thought so too, especially since it appears the lockheed affiliations stayed intact.

[Senior Trender @seniortrender]

They havnt come up in research on this topic much but the K-25 site was used for the NEPA program starting in 1946. M W Kellog was running many special aircraft projects for T-2/T-3 Department within Air Force Air Materiel Command around the same time. They additionally were pioneers of early Cryogenic efforts.

Interestingly, M W Kellog eventually turned into KBR, Inc when it merged into Haliburtons construction company. Likely a good company to keep an eye on regarding the UAP topic.

[Senior Trender @seniortrender]

@robjonesreports The K-25 gaseous diffusion plant at ORNL and Kellex parent company M. W Kellog company have some VERY interesting history 😉

[Disclosure Foundation @disclosurefound]

The National Security Agency has UAP records in highly classified intelligence channels.

Disclosure Foundation obtained hundreds of pages after challenging the agency’s initial denial under FOIA.

The production includes radar tracking reports, visual sightings, and intelligence reporting involving unidentified objects.

Many records were previously classified TOP SECRET UMBRA. TOP SECRET is the highest baseline classification level in the U.S. government, and UMBRA is historically associated with highly sensitive signals intelligence.

Many remain heavily redacted, even decades later.

A initial review reveals a striking pattern: entries with conventional explanations are often more readable, while several of the most anomalous reports remain heavily withheld.

High-speed objects. Silent lights changing direction. Disc-like forms. Luminous emissions. Fighter scrambles.

The takeaway is clear: the U.S. government was monitoring foreign reporting and technical observations related to UAP for decades, and treating that information as highly sensitive intelligence.

The data exists. The records exist. The secrecy remains.

Disclosure Foundation will continue fighting for the public disclosure these records demand.

Read the full release:
https://t.co/VJGcPCAVRd

[Senior Trender @seniortrender]

@shawnkevinjason That is interesting I agree but how does one even suggest things like this purely from intel gathered via long range observation of the outside of a saucer shaped object?

[Senior Trender @seniortrender]

Noticed an concerning omission on the newly released UAP files. Page 17 of this document batch has a index filing form for a document called "Intelligence Requirements on Flying Saucer Type Aircraft" but lacks the actual document it references. Well I have previously found this actual document (albeit hard to locate).

https://t.co/IFQeR4spaJ

The document itself is one of the most revealing on the subject in my opinion as it seems to almost infer that they have possession of a craft based on the very specific details requested.

https://t.co/Dx2BDmOR9w

[Disclosure Foundation @disclosurefound]

Today’s release includes UAP records from 4 agencies: the Department of War, FBI, NASA, and State Department.

That means key departments and agencies like the @NRO_gov, @NGA_GEOINT, @CIA, and @ENERGY still appear absent from the public picture.

The next step is for the agencies with the government’s most advanced collection and analytic capabilities to follow through, so Congress and the public can get a fuller picture of what we are dealing with.

[Senior Trender @seniortrender]

The question is, why was this not included in the release if they have the filing form to go with it (suggesting they have the original document as well)?

Is this how little they plan to release that they even omit previously publicly released documents?

[Disclosure Foundation @disclosurefound]

Disclosure Foundation stands with Rear Admiral Tim Gallaudet, Ph.D., U.S. Navy (Ret.).

Public servants with records of distinguished service deserve to be heard with seriousness, not dismissed through stigma or misrepresentation.

[Senior Trender @seniortrender]

This is really interesting as Samuel Reid was a co-founder at the Institute for Exotic Science along with Amy Eskridge. Samuel Reid also was/is director of NCAGE L0FH6 for the Mars 42 day mission with his company Geometric Partners. This mission included the Canadian Space Agency, NASA, Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, DARPA, Northrup Grumman, and Boeing.

https://t.co/i6g2Y6xZPV

[Senior Trender @seniortrender]

This is a good point to have settled and will admit I got it wrong based on my previous understanding of FOIA laws. Glad to see that this was also internally seen as a mistake and not typical FOIA practice to google open source material for further action on official requests.

[John Greenewald, Jr. @theblackvault]

🚨 Lots of people made a big deal about Dan Sherman, Project Preserve Destiny, and how the Air Force forwarded a FOIA request to the NSA, thus somehow confirming that this alien communication and/or adaptation project was real. That didn't seem right to me (as referrals are commonplace, even when no records exist), so, I set out to find out why, given I saw absolutely nothing that indicated what so many were excited about.

As expected, after a new FOIA drop just came in earlier today to me from the Air Force, it turns out the FOIA officer made a mistake and simply did a Google search after getting a vague FOIA request, which led to them forwarding the request to the NSA based on results they saw on Google. They absolutely made a mistake here, given they did research (when normally they shouldn't or wouldn't) then identified the IC component they forwarded it to which they never like. It's frustrating, but that happens.

In response to this behind the scenes, the NSA wondered why it was forwarded to them, and somewhat lectured the Air Force about them forwarding it in the first place. Apparently, the Air Force stated to the NSA that they had already corrected themselves with the FOIA requester (@NoahHradek), but I don't recall ever hearing about that correction. What I kept hearing about only focused on the fact it was forwarded, but the part about where the Air Force admitted to a mistake is not something I was aware of.

Did I miss that somewhere?

Attached here is the original FOIA, case processing notes to the FOIA request we heard about, and the back and forth between the NSA and USAF. What I don't see is the correction. @NoahHradek - did they send you one? Did you post that anywhere?

For those keeping notes, these documents came to me through FOIA 2026-00487-F as processed by the USAF.

cc: @AmericanALCHMY @AlchemyAmerican

[Senior Trender @seniortrender]

@theblackvault I posted a correction based on this information, but do have to ask the same question as you that if this was relayed back to the requestor - was the update posted anywhere and if not, why? That would have ended the speculation early on.