You yourself were against verifications via face scan/KYC and stuff like that. If the score is raised to 50, a person will have to go through KYC on CEXes one way or another, which is a problem for someone like me, for example, i don’t want to show my face, i live entirely on-chain @0xPaulThomas
@0xPaulThomas Wallet activity – age, transaction history, and balance – is what's in thчe spirit of Web3. And don't believe those sibilants who will say "we haven't used an EVM wallet before" – they are lying.
0G is officially on the Road to Mainnet!
The largest DeAI ecosystem is almost ready to ship. We are calling all builders to assemble and start building on 0G.
Check out a sneak preview of what is yet to come on our testnet via https://t.co/IDB01lq2mZ
Uniswap’s Unichain is here 💡
A faster, cheaper Ethereum L2, already powering 16M+ transactions!
Complete our Unichain quest to learn all about this Superchain-powered layer: https://t.co/n9HDyBEczm
Another report with false positives https://t.co/p8xt46yA2V
@PrimordialAA@LayerZero_Labs@LayerZero_Fndn
His methodology is based on Stargate DAO votes, each of which as we know had a deadline of 3 days. The accounts that performed the transactions that signed the votes were clustered with other wallets that randomly elsewhere on the planet performed exactly the same transactions with a timing of 4 days. LayerZero has 6 million wallets at the time of the snapshot. Don't you admit that voting can be plus minus at the same time, because users are members of different communities, where they are informed about the release of new voting. And here also the scatter in search of 4 days.....
https://t.co/y6Tctjbilx User is willing to undergo even KYS to prove his humanity. She actively voted for STG management proposals to be an active member of this community, also got the roles of staker and pool 1k. You can see she has assets on her wallet in the minutes. For example she restacks ezETH in Mendi for over $1000, holds liquidity in Stargate for over $1000 and has other assets in different networks.
https://t.co/SmejYs7BRn
There are a lot of complaints about this report in the discrrd. I've only looked at the ones that were unfair. Here's another example https://t.co/91g7aw5J7p
As you can see, there are false positives. And the methodology is very questionable! So you can't use this cluster, especially other projects can use these lists later. And the real user will get a tag on his real wallet.
@PrimordialAA
Greetings Bryan. Could you please look closely to this report https://t.co/naX29tDkFs There is cluster 6 It is a cluster of 20 wallets My wallet is in there: 0x933781219beb81A7F45714c7D229A1FcaB0c01FD
Similar number transactions, source chains. MATIC 10TX,BSC 21-22TX,ARB 17-20TX,OP 11-14TX,AVAX 3-4TX,FTM 1TX
Well, the numbers are different, but ok, looks like we are just counting over all number of transactions.
But lets open some wallets and look at first interaction with LayerZero.
My wallet 0x933781219beb81A7F45714c7D229A1FcaB0c01FD
1 txn - stargate (well it, official number one bridge for LayerZero, who would not try it first): Arb -> Opt (nothing special, top L2 blockchains who would not try it)
2 txn - stargate: Arb -> Opt
3 txn - stargate: Arb -> Opt
Lets take wallet from cluster: 0x5ede81e859c439c3578a45df3de15eed02731d2b
1 txn - stargate (i want to remind, more then a year ago, official number one bridge for LayerZero): Opt -> Arb (top L2 blockchains)
2 txn - stargate: Arb -> Opt
3 txn - stargate: Opt -> Arb
Lets take another wallet 0x638d7c119739554f4ad211c961145852e48812dd
1 txn - stargate: Opt -> Arb
2 txn - stargate: Arb -> Opt
3 txn - stargate: Arb -> Opt
I've sent you in dm more clarifications with links, because twitter doesn't allow me to post them properly
@PrimordialAA Good afternoon, @PrimordialAA , I am writing regarding the methodology of this software - https://t.co/XO7tz4BODo.
My wallet has made it to this list and I will argue why this report gives too many false positives:
@PrimordialAA@vittoriomaisano This report is based on the fact that several hundred accounts used the ref of one of the CIS influencers in several DEXs to maintain zksync liquidity. Why should followers of an influencer be labeled as sybils if they, upon request, helped the person take top positions in pools?