THIS IS WHAT WE’VE BEEN WAITING FOR!!!
RFK announced that in July the following peptides will be reviewed again and likely be allowed to be legally prescribed. Including several of my favorites:
BPC-157 - super healer
TB-500 - ligaments/tendon healer
GHK-Cu - skin, hair
MOTS-c - mitochondrial optimizer skeletal
Epithalon - brain/longevity reset
DSIP - deep sleep
Dihexa - brain optimizer, ⬇️ neuroinflam
Ibutamoren - oral growth hormone
Melanontan II - tanning, immune, sexual
KPV - anti-inflammatory
Semax - stroke, brain recovery,
LL-37 - fights virus, mold, Lyme, immune
I’ve been prescribing 10 (of 12) of these regularly since 2020.
There’s so many uses for these, and when used properly, they are VERY safe. Really good stacking protocols.
Likely by the late summer millions of Americans will have save access to these peptides through compounding pharmacies.
AMAZING NEWS‼️ 👏🏼
Good evening from the Coconut Tree
@KamalaHarris
Ma’am, (can we call you Ma'am?) we’ll keep this factual and review your actual record, not your reboot.
As a U.S. Senator (2017-2021), you were an original cosponsor of the Green New Deal resolution (S.Res. 59).
It directed the US to “divest from fossil fuels,” phase out oil, gas, and coal production and remake the entire economy around subsidized green mandates.
Your 2020 campaign was shorter than a Garden Gnome but managed to work in these gems:
You told the CNN town hall:
“There’s no question I’m in favor of banning fracking.”
On Jimmy Fallon’s Tonight Show:
“We will end fracking once and for all” while committing to the Green New Deal.
Your $10 trillion climate plan called for no new fossil fuel leases on federal lands, phasing out all oil & gas (even if renewables weren’t ready), a carbon fee, and doubling U.S. payments to the UN Green Climate Fund.
Before that, as California Attorney General (2011-2017), you built a reputation suing our industry.
The lawfare you pursued laid the foundation for the collapse of the California refining industry we are witnessing right now
You even sued the Obama-Biden administration to block new offshore permits off California’s coast.
Remember 2022?
As VP, national gas prices hit $5+/gallon (over $6 in parts of CA).
You told Americans those record prices were “a price to pay for democracy” for Ukraine.
But apparently the freedom of millions of Irainian citizens are not worth $3.97 a gallon now?
That seems - I don't know - selective?
Bottom line.
California still pays the nation’s highest gas prices — thanks to the taxes, mandates, and anti-production policies you championed for years.
Flying cross country (made possible by jet fuel) to North Carolina to make a video isn't going to change that.
And those are the facts - unburdened by what has been.
Hello @TomSteyer,
California gas prices are “outrageous” — we agree. It is unfortunate that our customers are not only paying high prices for gasoline but even more to just to feed the voracious appetite of a bloated state bureaucracy.
But let’s stick to the data instead of the usual Sacramento script.
As of April 2026:
• CA average: ~$5.89/gallon
• National average: ~$4.08/gallon
• Difference: +$1.81 that has ZERO to do with any war or “Big Oil.”
That premium has existed for decades — long before this conflict began.
Highest gas taxes & fees in America (~71¢ excise + sales + cap-and-trade + LCFS credits = nearly $1.80/gal in total state burden).
CARB’s boutique “California-only” fuel blend that no other state can supply.
Decades of refinery closures, low-carbon mandates, and permitting hell that slashed in-state capacity while CA imported more crude from foreign sources.
Nevada imports 85-90% of its fuel from those same strangled California refineries. Arizona gets ~33%.
Green ideology isn’t just screwing Californians — it’s pricing out your neighbors too. (Sound familiar, @AaronDFordNV?)
You and Governor Newsom keep blaming Trump and producers for the mess Sacramento engineered.
Meanwhile, the same CARB regs you cheered are now a national security issue for DoD bases on the West Coast. Trump’s Defense Production Act moves to fix what ideology broke. That’s not “Big Oil” — that’s basic energy security.
And while we’re on the topic of who really benefits:
It is our understanding that you built your ~$2 billion fortune running Farallon Capital, a hedge fund that delivered big returns in part through investments in fossil fuels — including coal mines and power plants abroad.
Then your fund pivoted to climate investing via Galvanize Climate Solutions, raising hundreds of millions for “decarbonization” plays and profitinh handsomely from the subsidies, mandates, and regulations.
In political science terms this would be called rent-seeking.
Energy security isn’t optional.
American oil & gas delivers it — when Sacramento gets out of the way.
But it sounds like if elected you're not prepared to get out of the way.
At any rate, thank you for sharing your views on this important issue.
I feel sorry for the taxpayers there. They've had a series of bad decisions on policy that are still in place. Politicians come and go. Policies stay in place till they're removed. I've been going there for 18 years now. I have watched it slowly degrade the entire state. It's sad to watch it happen. They used to be energy self-sufficient. Now they're actually the first place to see $7 gasoline. They did it to themselves. I really appeal to the voters of California. I feel your pain. Why don't you vote for a new policy? I don't care who, who you put in place. Vote someone who's gonna change the policy, then you'll be winners again.
@AshRuns100s Well, I'm no 100 miler, but 108 miles and 29,000' is a crazy lot and I would assume pretty technical. Have you watched the 38 minute video?