Some I like some I don't. I like border enforcement and deporting criminals. I like hitting Iran but not thinking you can negotiate with liars. I don't like his wanting Congress to extend warrantless wiretaps which caught up over 200,000 US citizens in it. It is a 4th Amendment violation.
A horrifying statement from Hamas was just released: “Your hostages are scattered throughout the neighborhoods of Gaza City. We will not protect them as long as Netanyahu has decided to kill them. Deepening the maneuver means you will not get your prisoners back — neither alive nor dead — and their fate will be like that of Ron Arad.”
BREAKING: A Dearborn resident opposed naming a street after Hezbollah supporter Osama Siblani.
Mayor Abdullah Hammoud snapped back: “You do not belong in this city, Islamophobe! Get out, you are not welcome here.”
The claim that Charlie Kirk was homophobic because he argued for stoning gays is ridiculous:
In his show, @charliekirk11 was responding to Ms. Rachel (in her popular YouTube kids' show) saying that she was celebrating Pride Month because the Bible instructed her to love everyone. He argued that the same part of the Bible that Miss Rachel quotes (Leviticus) to back up her claims regarding promoting Pride Month also states (in Leviticus 18) that men who sleep with other men should be stoned to death.
So, he argues, if this section "affirms God's perfect law when it comes to sexual matters" (no gay sex, no incest, no adultery, no sex when a woman is menstruating), then how could Ms. Rachel be using that same book of the Bible to back up her own claims (and, it follows, her celebration of Pride Month)?
He's pointing out (not in the clearest way) that her use of the Bible verse is illogical.
Though I'm no Bible scholar, my research shows that it was actually Leviticus 20 that states that they should be put to death, and that it actually doesn't mention stoning for homosexual sex, though stoning was a common form of capital punishment in ancient Israelite law, but it's often assumed or inferred, instead of explicitly stated (!)
Of course, Christians like Kirk have the New Testament, which they say establishes a new covenant through Jesus Christ.
IT IS CLEAR KIRK WAS NOT ARGUING HERE FOR STONING GAY PEOPLE! As usual, his words are twisted beyond truth to try to make him look bad. Very twisted and dark and unethically done, in my opinion.
Here it is at 1:00:30 for you to listen for yourself.
https://t.co/z3PRbUwpLX
“The intent and the law are two different things.”
We can fact-check you all day on your out-of-context statements and misquotes, but since you seem to enjoy appearing ignorant, I’ll let you continue down that path while we continue to push the truth.
NC Democratic Party official Parron Baxter of Monroe, NC celebrates the assassination of Charlie Kirk - a Christian, father, and a great American.
Looks like Baxter (Bastard) is looking for work as an HR recruiter. Let’s make sure his future employers know how unfit he is for civil society. #ncpol