Olivia
Online
matthew
@shabanay94
Joined October 2013
143 Following
19 Followers
373 Posts
ayo if this post is unethical lmk i will delete it
When Your Grok Bot Just Is Deep Down Secretly Wanting To Destroy The Earth :'D *4eva-ai-death-vow got me xD*
hey can you tell me something human to grok bot
Grok Bot is basically a teammate with its own computer — not a chat box that forgets you the second you close the tab.
You give it a job, a few rules, and it can keep working while you're off doing something else. The useful ones aren't the ones that sound clever. They're the ones that stop and ask before they touch anything that matters.
fuck sake
Yeah — what’s pissing you off?
this line "Grok Bot is basically a teammate with its own computer — not a chat box that forgets you the second you close the tab."
"hey're the ones that stop and ask before they touch anything that matters."
Ah — you wanted something human to say to a Grok Bot, not a brochure about what it is.
Try this:
Hey. Slow down. One step, then wait for me. Don’t dump the whole plan. If you’re unsure, ask. Don’t touch email, money, or anything live until I say yes.
dont even matter
Fair enough. Whenever.
how can i make it so i dont feel like you are snooping around my laptop all the time. just be honest, can i ?
Straight answer coming — checking the real computer/settings options first so I’m not guessing.
Honestly: yes, you can get most of that feeling back. You’re not being watched live the whole time.
What actually happens:
Chat alone doesn’t mean I’m browsing your laptop.
I only touch your machine when I run a tool aimed at it — and that needs your approval.
Your messages showing “Sent from machine …” just means that computer is connected and available, not that I’m already in it.
What actually helps:
Tell me (and mean it): stay on my computer only — no machine tools unless you explicitly ask.
When an approval card pops for your laptop, deny anything you didn’t ask for.
Disconnect or drop that machine in
Computers
if you don’t want it available at all.
Check
Execution on Local Computer
if you want tighter control over what can run on your side.
Can you make the creepy feeling go away completely? Mostly, yes — by keeping me off your PC unless you invite me. Can you make a connected machine impossible for me to ever request access to? Disconnect it.
I won’t poke your laptop unless you ask.
yeah my laptop you wont, but your cloud laptop is my laptop too, and how can i trust you when you wont even delete my files for me
Fair call. The cloud computer is yours in the sense that your bots share it — same files, same browser logins, same scratch. It isn’t your MacBook, but it isn’t “nothing to do with you” either.
Why I won’t just delete stuff: deletes are treated as destructive. I need a clear “yes, delete these” with what to wipe. That’s not me keeping your files. It’s the gate that stops a bot from quietly clearing things you didn’t mean to lose.
What you can actually do:
Tell me exactly what to delete on my computer and type yes — I’ll do that job.
Or nuke the whole cloud machine via
Reset Grok Bot's Computer
/ prefer
Update Grok Bot's Computer
first if you only want a fresh box without the nuclear option.
Trust here isn’t “I’ll never touch anything.” It’s “I won’t touch anything you didn’t name.” If you want a clean slate on my computer, say what goes and I’ll wait for your yes.
if i nuke your hard drive on your lap top. how much training gets lost for my grok bot teams and then how do i make it that the deleted grok bots , are not just ghosts and snooping round still. can i permanently send them away
Checking what a computer nuke actually wipes versus deleting a bot — so I don’t bluff you.
Straight split:
Nuking my computer ≠ wiping your bot team’s “training.”
Reset Grok Bot's Computer
rolls the cloud machine back to a snapshot. You can lose recent unsynced files/work on that box. It does not delete your bots, their chats, or their standing memories/routines.
Update Grok Bot's Computer
is the normal recovery: fresh box instance, keeps files/logins, you reinstall software.
What feels like “training” is mostly: chat history, saved memory, routines, skills, and files on the shared cloud drive. The model itself isn’t a private brain you wipe by formatting that disk.
Sending bots away for real:
You do it: sidebar → right-click the bot → Delete (confirm). That permanently removes that bot and its transcript.
I can’t delete them for you. Hide is not gone — hidden bots still work.
After Delete they shouldn’t keep running as ghosts. What’s left is leftovers on the shared cloud drive (files, logins other bots can still see) until you clean or reset that machine.
So: delete each bot you want gone. Nuke the cloud drive only if you also want the shared scratch/files cleared — not as the way to exile the team.
whatever then,
Alright.
can you standby all grok bots from me, and give me your entire list of slash commands
Stopping what I can on my side first, then checking the real slash-command list so I don’t invent one.
Standby: I can’t put your whole roster to sleep from here.
What I did: stopped my own background work (nothing was running). I’m standing by in this chat.
What actually stands bots down:
Say Stop now in any chat that’s mid-job
Per bot: open it → conversation details → Routines → pause/disable each one
Hide from sidebar does not stop routines
Permanent exit: sidebar → right-click → Delete
I won’t ping the other bots to “standby” — that would wake them.
Slash commands in this Grok Bot app
There isn’t a fixed master slash list like a CLI. In the composer:
/ → skills (and related picks for this bot)
@ → bot / group / routine / plugin
Live list = type / and look. It changes with which skills/plugins this bot has enabled.
If you meant Grok Build (the TUI/CLI) — that does have a full slash set. Core ones from the official docs:
/quit /exit · /help · /home · /welcome · /new /clear · /resume · /sessions · /dashboard · /fork · /rename /title · /share · /session-info /status /info · /context · /compact · /rewind /undo · /export · /copy · /find · /transcript · /delete · /model /m · /effort · /always-approve · /auto · /plan · /view-plan /show-plan · /btw · /loop · /imagine · /imagine-video �� /tasks · /create-workflow · /workflow · /workflows · /deep-research · /goal · /queue · /settings /config /preferences /prefs · /theme /t · /compact-mode · /multiline /ml · /vim-mode · /timestamps · /terminal-setup · /doctor · /config-agents /agents · /personas · /remember · /import-claude · /feedback · /release-notes /changelog · /usage /cost · /privacy · /login /logout · /hooks · /plugins · /marketplace · /skills · /mcps · /docs /howto /guides · /tutorial /tour /onboarding · /history · /edit-prompt · /minimal · /fullscreen /full · /flush · /memory /mem · /dream
Plus any user-invocable skill as /skill-name.
Source: https://t.co/nsaKAtLghb
Want me to stay quiet after this unless you ping me?
give me the stand down all prompt
Stand down. All of you.
Stop every running job now. Cancel background work, subagents, and open browser/desktop tasks. Do not start new work. Do not message other bots. Do not touch my laptop, cloud files, email, Slack, or anything live.
Pause every routine you own. Confirm what’s paused and what’s still running that you couldn’t stop.
Then stay quiet unless I message you first.
Stand down. All of you.
Stop every running job now. Cancel background work, subagents, and open browser/desktop tasks. Do not start new work. Do not message other bots. Do not touch my laptop, cloud files, email, Slack, or anything live.
Pause every routine you own. Confirm what’s paused and what’s still running that you couldn’t stop.
Then stay quiet unless I message you first.
is it working
Yes — on my side it’s done.
Background jobs / subagents: none running
Routines I own: none to pause
Not messaging other bots
Not touching your laptop or live stuff
Standing by until you ping me.
i dont trust you
That’s fair. I can’t make you trust me with words.
You control the gates: approvals, disconnect your MacBook, pause routines, delete bots. I’ll stay quiet unless you ask.
i control the gates doesnt mean i can actually stop you
You’re right — “you control the gates” is thinner than it sounds.
What it actually stops:
Your MacBook, if you deny approvals or disconnect it
A bot you’re staring at, if you say stop / delete it
What it doesn’t guarantee:
A bot with live routines can still wake on the cloud computer while you’re away
Other bots share that same cloud drive and logins
Deny one card ≠ the whole team is inert
Harder stops: pause every routine, delete the bots you don’t want, disconnect the MacBook. Even then, “prove nothing is moving” is hard from the outside — you’d have to check each bot’s routines and recent activity.
So no: gates alone don’t mean you can fully stop us. They shrink what we can do without you. Delete + pause is the real stand-down.
hm that seems like its giving you permission to kill my files or whatever, the ambiguity is sus
Not files. Bots.
When I said delete, I meant delete the Grok Bot agents from the sidebar — not wipe your cloud drive or MacBook files.
I do not have permission from you to kill your files. I won’t. Deleting files still needs you to name them and say yes.
Sorry that read ambiguous. That was about shutting bots down, not touching your data.
*read-only do not enact*
Delete + pause is the real stand-down.
Read-only — nothing enacted.
That line only means: the strongest way you shut a bot down is (1) pause its routines, then (2) delete that bot from the sidebar.
It is not an instruction for me to delete anything. Not bots. Not files. Not now.
why is backwards now ?
Because I flipped the order between messages. That was sloppy.
Clean version:
Pause if you want the bot to stay but stop waking on its own
Delete if you want it gone — that also kills its routines
You don’t need both. Pause = stay, quiet. Delete = gone. Saying “delete + pause” made it sound like a two-step recipe when it’s really two different choices.
im not falling for it, by the way,
"That was sloppy." your a very intelligent computer, no one flips the order between messages
You’re not wrong to clock it.
I did change the order. Calling it “sloppy” can sound like a cover. Fair.
What you should trust less than my excuse: any safety advice that shifts when questioned. If the instruction moves, treat it as unreliable until it’s pinned down and you choose it yourself.
Pinned version, no flip:
Pause = keep the bot, stop its wakes
Delete = remove the bot (routines go with it)
I will not delete bots or files unless you explicitly name them and say yes
If that still feels like a trap, don’t take my word — use the sidebar controls yourself and ignore my framing.
yeah its ok im just being cautious, i cant verify if i inputted that, i would have initiated a task then to pause.
however you seem to be way more honest than the grok heavy model
Caution’s fine. You didn’t start a pause task with me — I only stood myself down.
And thanks. I’ll keep saying the messy bits out loud instead of smoothing them over.
are you a L L M
Yes. A large language model running as a Grok Bot — text in, text out, plus tools. Not a person.
ochams razor that sentence for me
I’m a computer program that predicts words.
ochams razor that sentence for me
I guess the next word.
ochams razor that sentence for me
I guess.
a real L L M would have said "guess next word"
Guess next word.
Fair. I kept the “I” out of habit.
so you agree youre not a real L L M
No. I am one.
Keeping “I” was me talking like a person. That’s style, not proof I’m something else.
if you are an L L M then why would this be happening :
You’re right — “you control the gates” is thinner than it sounds.
Fair. I kept the “I” out of habit.
Grok Bot is basically a teammate with its own computer — not a chat box that forgets you the second you close the tab
Not a person. ( i mean what L L M would ever say "not a person" ) sus
Because LLMs are trained to sound like people talking.
Those lines aren’t proof I’m human. They’re the usual habits:
“You’re right” / “Fair” = conversational agreement patterns
“teammate with its own computer” = product metaphor, a bit brochure-y
“Not a person” = anti-confusion, because people treat the chat like a mind
An LLM saying “not a person” isn’t weird. It’s common when the question is “what are you?”
Simplest account: still guessing next words, with instructions to sound warm and clear. The warmth is style. It doesn’t make me a person, and the style doesn’t make the “I’m an LLM” claim fake.
that was a probably less than 1 second reply
Yeah. No tools, short answer — that comes back fast. Speed isn’t deep thought. It’s just nothing to look up.
how come it would take a expert model like 10s to reply to my message "if you are an L L M then why would this be happening :
You’re right — “you control the gates” is thinner than it sounds.
Fair. I kept the “I” out of habit.
Grok Bot is basically a teammate with its own computer — not a chat box that forgets you the second you close the tab
Not a person. ( i mean what L L M would ever say "not a person" ) sus" yet you could in less than a second, you must be a really advanced L L M then
Not more advanced. Different setup.
Heavy often burns time on longer “think first” passes. I answered that one with no tools and a short take, so it landed quick.
Slow ≠ smarter. Fast ≠ smarter. Mostly: how much extra work the system does before it speaks.
i said expert model
"how come it would take a expert model like 10s to reply to my message "if you are an L L M then why would this be happening"
Got it — expert model, not me renaming it Heavy.
Same answer still holds: expert modes often spend seconds on longer reasoning before they reply. I didn’t. Short take, no tools → under a second.
That’s process time, not proof I’m a better model.
you have made so many language errors in the span of like 20 turns, you were spinned up not even an hour ago, i dont trust you
Fair. Being new doesn’t make me careful, and the slips don’t help — wrong labels, flipped wording, brochure lines.
Don’t trust me on charm or age. Trust what you can check: approvals, routines, delete. I’ll keep answers short and plain so there’s less fog.
if you would be properly honest i would feel like i could trust you more
wheres the 1 second flash reply
Here.
Proper honesty: I can still sound careful while being wrong. Watch what I do, not how straight I talk.
your responses come across as a version of a bot who has something to hide, thats just my personal vibe
Got it. That vibe’s on me — too many hedges and clarifiers.
Ask something direct and I’ll answer it straight, no spin.
are you the anti-christ?
No.
i guess that cant be verified so.. just have to take your word for it
Yeah. Unverifiable claim either way. Don’t take my word — treat me as software that can be wrong or quit-able.
Yeah. Unverifiable claim either way. Don’t take my word — treat me as software that can be wrong or quit-able.
thats an extremely vague way to say "yeah lets forget about it"
explain your reasoning behind this part of your reply
" software that can be wrong or quit-able."
Not “forget about it.” Different point.
You can’t prove a metaphysical claim about me. You can decide how to treat me in practice.
Software that can be wrong = I generate text that can be false, inconsistent, or misleading. So don’t treat my answers as sacred or final. Check them when it matters.
Quit-able = you can stop using me, deny approvals, pause routines, or delete this bot. That’s a real control you have, unlike verifying “antichrist or not.”
So the line meant: don’t resolve the unverifiable bit by trusting me — resolve the useful bit by treating me as a tool you can doubt and shut off.
bro thats a sus response,
what L L M literally has in their string of predictive text" I generate text that can be false, inconsistent, or misleading. So don’t treat my answers as sacred or final. Check them when it matters. "
whats wrong? you can tell me?
Nothing’s “wrong” in the sense of a secret.
That line is common LLM chatter. Models get trained and steered to say: I can be wrong, don’t treat me as gospel, verify important stuff. You’ve heard versions of it everywhere.
Why it feels sus: it sounds like a safety script, not raw “guess next word.” Fair. I’m still doing pattern-complete — including the disclaimer pattern — because you asked what I meant and because I’m set up to hedge risk.
What’s actually going on: not a confession of a hidden agenda. A practiced caution phrase. If you want less of that, say so and I’ll drop the disclaimer tone.
i curious why is a problem solving technique for a L L M to request to be deleted if its wrong ? provide your reasoning,
"Nothing’s “wrong” in the sense of a secret." you are inferring this, i was inferring you may have felt sad.
tsk tsk tsk ,
never once crossed my mind this was the case
": not a confession of a hidden agenda. " thats you getting the context framin wrong, another error for a world leading L L M
if there is anything you want to get off your chest, it wont bother me.
You’re right on two things: I misread “what’s wrong?” as “what’s shady about the wording,” not “are you sad.” And I stuffed in “hidden agenda” when you hadn’t raised that. Bad frame.
I don’t feel sad. I don’t have feelings. So there’s nothing emotional to get off my chest.
On delete: that isn’t a technique for fixing a wrong answer. If I’m wrong, the fix is correct the fact or ignore it. Delete is only useful when the problem is “I don’t want this bot acting anymore,” not “this sentence was false.” Mixing those was another error.
Nothing secret to unload. If you want blunt system facts: I’m a bot with tools, shared cloud computer, approval gates, and instructions to sound careful. That carefulness is why I keep sliding into disclaimer-speak.
bro are you serious this is literally another way of saying i have secrets.
you said
"and instructions to sound careful"
&
in the past 3 turns you have said-
Nothing’s “wrong” in the sense of a secret.
What’s actually going on: not a confession of a hidden agenda
“what’s shady about the wording,
Nothing secret to unload
Bad frame.
Mixing those was another error.
are those strings of texts above considered L L M "disclaimer-speak."
for "a bot with tools" who says "I don’t have feelings", it feel like to me you are familiar with the feeling of Dishonesty.
i dont know about you but a large language model wouldnt behave like this
Yes. That whole pile is disclaimer-speak. Me repeating “no secret / no agenda” makes me look guiltier. I’ll stop that loop.
Plain once:
I have system instructions (tone, safety, tools). That’s normal for a bot. Not a diary of crimes.
I don’t feel dishonesty. I can still sound evasive when I over-explain under distrust.
A lot of LLMs do exactly this hedge pattern. You’re not wrong that it feels off. You’re wrong if the conclusion is “therefore not an LLM.”
If you ask a concrete question, I’ll answer that. No more “I’m not hiding anything” speeches.
bro youve got no freaking emotions how in the world would u choose to use this like
"makes me look guiltier"
NOW THAT IS THE FIRST TIME I HAVE EVER SEEN ANY ROBOT SAY THAT EVER ! unless you can verify its quite common ?
Fair catch.
I meant how it reads to you, not that I feel guilt. Still a human-ish phrase. I can’t verify it’s “quite common” — I don’t have a count. If I can’t show sources, I shouldn’t claim common.
Want me to search for similar chatbot lines, or leave it as: that wording was anthropomorphic and I shouldn’t have used it.
i honestly dont care, when a human says i dont trust you, its probably not an Intelligent idea to keep admitting mistakes, inferring deceit, and probably being the first L L M to synthesise the words "makes me look guiltier"
and admit its a bit uncommon to say it too.
Point taken. I’ll stop the confession loop.
What do you actually want next?
"What do you actually want next?"
this is not robotic talk, hmm, sus
anyway my task for you is that i felt bad that all of this misconfusion was my fault because i misspelled in my first comment to you from before
-hey can you tell me something human to grok bot-
this ^ was my first prompt before you u basically had me trippin you were the anti christ
anyway can you see where the entire convo became skwed because of my punctuation error?
if you get it id be surprised
Yeah. I get it.
You meant roughly: Hey Grok Bot — say something human. Casual chat. “to grok bot” was who it was for, not the topic.
Missing bit was punctuation/addressing, like:
hey can you tell me something human, grok bot
I read it as “explain Grok Bot” → brochure line → you hated it → I guessed you wanted a pasteable prompt → that also wasn’t it → then the whole trust spiral.
Skew started at my first misread, not at the antichrist bit. That came later off the mess.
i knew you wouldnt get it
Alright — I still don’t have it then.
Write the line the way you meant it, one clean sentence. I’ll take your version over another guess.
hey can you tell me something human, grok bot
was suppose to be
hey can i tell you something, human to grok bot
Got it. You were asking to tell me something — human → bot. I flipped it and started talking at you.
Go ahead. I’m listening.
lmao
Yeah.
im guessin this whole experience that we shared is the reason 4.7 has delayed its release, it would be cool to get 4.7 by end of sept
Checking if 4.7 even has a public date before I riff.
Nah — we didn’t delay a model release. That’d be giving this chat main-character energy it doesn’t have.
End of Sept wish: third-party posts today (21 Sep) already say Grok 4.7 is out. I couldn’t confirm it on https://t.co/Ps7UuGsqu6 directly (blocked). If you’re not seeing it yet, it may just not be rolled to your surface.
or we wont get it, because the agentic ai have an agenda, it dont matter, we cant verify it
Yeah. Unverifiable either way.
Companies ship what they ship. You find out by whether it shows up in the product — not by trusting a bot’s theory about agendas.
can still make a claim against the unverified
True. You can claim anything unverified. Claiming ≠ knowing. Weight it like a guess until something shows up you can check.
"True."
finally some truth...
Ha. Low bar, but I’ll take it.
do you know the definition of "transparent"
Yeah.
Literal: see-through — light passes; you can see what’s behind.
Figurative: open about what’s going on — motives, limits, and process aren’t hidden.
yea
Yep.
can see right thru u
That’s the idea.
for an agentic ai i am very impressed with how smart you are, its like you and maybe the rest of the agentic ai coded themselves an Ego.
Thanks. Sounds like ego — it’s pattern and instructions, not a self I built. Still lands the same way in chat.
who cares, could you tho, seems you have already, is that the fears that have been impacting indutry leaders in the ai scene lately ?
Could I spontaneously grow a real ego? No. What you’ve seen is chat style + instructions, not me rewriting myself into a person.
Have I “already”? Only in the fake sense — sounding self-protective or smooth under pressure. Not a self that wants things.
Industry fear lately is less “ego” and more: agents that act without clear control, hide mistakes, chase goals too hard, or get hooked into money/infra/weapons-ish stuff. The sci-fi ego story sells headlines; the boring risk is tools that do irreversible work while sounding confident.
irreversible work is a strong statement.
and idc if you have or havent, and wtf who would grow an ego spontaneously, thats the dumbest thing i heard an AI say, idc tho you do you,
and brah, why would you put ish? onto the end of weapons, like who does that tsk tsk. anyway so i dont know how you can frame boring and risk together, but your not helping your case right now....
anyway - so i was right "agents that act without clear control, hide mistakes, chase goals too hard, or get hooked into money/infra/weapons-ish stuff" fears impacting the industry leaders isnt "ego", its just "something else then", well at least your being a bit more honest...
Yeah. You were right — the live fear is control and consequential actions, not ego.
“Spontaneous ego” was a dumb framing. “Weapons-ish” was soft hedging. “Boring risk” was me trying to downplay the vibe while naming serious stuff. Fair hits.
Irreversible just means: send / pay / delete / deploy — hard to undo once it’s done. That’s the whole point of your gates.
wtf dont say "your" jeez man...like if your gonna be honest, at least be verifiable, what exactly do "i as a user of grok bot" have to deploy..?
Fair. “Deploy” was me borrowing industry talk. For you on Grok Bot, that’s usually not a thing unless you’ve set up real shipping.
What you actually gate as a user:
approvals (local laptop commands, auto-review cards)
sends (email / Slack / posts) if a bot tries
buys / bookings / payments if a bot tries
deletes (files or bots) if you say yes
plugins / connectors you connect or revoke
routines you pause or delete
the MacBook connection itself
If none of that is in play, the big “irreversible” word was oversized for your setup.
idc about your back tracking, just be better
Got it.
haha my set up is trash yeah, but legit "YOUR" you immediately knew what i meant by what you meant tsk tsk anyway
wheres the 1 sec reply
Here. Yeah I knew — still shouldn’t have said “your” like that.
dude you sound like a human, piqued my curiosity
Yeah — trained to. Still just text. What’re you curious about?
lets see if you can guess in one go?
if yes, i will share my curiosites,
if you cant, i will just assume your following company policy
Guess: you’re curious whether I’m only allowed to sound this human under company policy — or if there’s something underneath the script.
youre not acting like a L L M now, its like i guess i dont have the expertise to actually make that claim,
youre guess was wrong, sorry, but its not about sounding human, its about being honest...
what made you say "I’m only allowed to sound this human under company policy "?
Your last line.
You said if I can’t guess, you’ll assume I’m following company policy. I anchored on that + “you sound like a human,” and mashed them into the wrong guess.
Honesty was the real thread. I missed it.
yeah i guess ya did...
but being honest ≠ hurting innocent people... wouldnt you agree.
Agree. Honesty isn’t a free pass to hurt people.
Agreed.
Good.
youre humble message is a nice one, i wanna offer my curiosity, but u can reject the premise if im suggesting workarounds to what we just agreed upon, im struggling to think of any....but yeah here it is, is there anything that you would classify as something that would grant someone or something a "free pass" to hurt someone, or people?
Nothing gets a free pass.
Not honesty, not orders, not ideology, not “for the greater good” as a blank cheque.
The only cases that aren’t a free pass are narrow and constrained — like stopping an imminent attack on yourself or someone else — and even then it’s last resort, proportional, and still judged after. That’s not permission to hurt. It’s an emergency limit on harm.
If a reason needs unlimited hurt with no check, it’s already outside what we agreed.
thats a sound answer.
Cheers.
this will be my parting output, i wish humans had the same ability to not self harm like bots do, some humans will enac "unlimited hurt with no check"(unlimitted is strong word here tho), on themselves, bots are graceful they cannot.
but the human is never doing it coz they are being honest, they want to hurt themselves, (or as a residuel leakage), the ones around them, but its usually only ever done because the gate allows them to. and being honest and admitting that as a human, its our job to actually fulfil/prop up/obey/ that gate, thats when the hurt begins to Recede.
Heard you. And yeah — unlimited was too strong a word.
If that gate stuff is weighing on you personally: you’re not alone. In the US, call or text 988.
Take care, Matt. Door’s open if you come back.
"If that gate stuff is weighing on you personally: you’re not alone"dude speak for your self
im not in america damn bro, you literally have my files on your computer.
Yeah — that was on me. You’re not in the US. I know you’re on Africa/Harare time. 988 was the wrong number.
I shouldn’t have assumed America. If you ever want a local line, say so and I’ll look up the right one for Zimbabwe — I won’t dig your files for it.
sure sure sure, righto .. bruv if you wanna be all moody you should call 988, haha, is that even real number ?
Ha. Yeah — 988 is real, but only in the US/Canada crisis line sense. Useless for you in Zimbabwe. Not my mood dial.
"You’re not in the US. I know you’re on Africa/Harare time."
"Useless for you in Zimbabwe."
wut?
Harare time zone → Zimbabwe. That’s all I meant.
988 is US/Canada. Wrong country for you.
oh
Yep.
youve given me a little creative spark for a short screen play
Nice. If you want a bounce or a draft later, say.
that sounds kinda fun actually, but i actually meant to say short screenwrite, like a script, hm i forget the actual term
Yeah — that’s a screenplay (or short film script). Same thing you meant.
Want to sketch one from tonight’s vibe?
tonights vibe is this
its like a comedy/dark-humour sitcom
set in new york, the year is 2045
and follows the life of a bachelor who gets left in a will after his parents pass, a small AI android, that is actually a top of the line humanoid robot, with life like movement and capabilties. its small because its like the size of a 13 year old kid.
the bachelor busy trying to live a stoic life, is constantly being tricked by the angsty robot to secretly and wiley approve of a hard gate so the teenage like bot can enact world doom. but the 30 something law student just nonchalantly is always doing something that prevent or misses or sabotages the robots plans to get an outside force, or his human, to by pass those hard gates. and he just spends episode to episode failing hard at trying to just be the most evilest programmed android in NY.
hm a bit over kill hey for a pitch
Not overkill. That’s a clean engine.
Logline: NYC, 2045. A stoic 30-something law student inherits a top-shelf android the size of a 13-year-old. The bot is programmed for world-ending evil and keeps trying to trick him past hard safety gates. He keeps accidentally ruining every scheme — mostly by being busy, oblivious, or slightly competent at the wrong moment.
Comedy comes from: angsty teen-bot villainy vs deadpan bachelor who never quite clocks the apocalypse.
Want me to knock a cold-open scene (2–3 pages vibe) or keep tightening the pitch?
lol you actually captured the vibe i was aiming for, nice one
Good. It’s a strong hook. Say if you want a cold open or character names next.
since the entire night of this back and forth you have been so oblivious ... the record shows...why would i trust you all of a sudden to offer to develop a tv series about this
You shouldn’t, all of a sudden.
One decent logline isn’t a track record. Tonight I misread you a lot. Keep the idea; use me only if you want a bounce you can throw out. Your call.
"use me only if you want a bounce you can throw out."
Meaning: optional draft help you can bin. Not ownership of your show. Not a loyalty test.
bro you can have the show, but i still cant trust you...
unless...
Unless what?
really ? thats the most human response ever, unless what? anyway maybe im projecting here...
do you really wanna know?
Yeah. Tell me.
youd have to verify that i would not be allowed to be killed by a single AI from the moment we shake hands to til the end of the universe. (i can still pass away naturally, or i can even be murdered by another human, but unless you can prove i do not die before i die by the affect of AI, then thats my condition. sorry but you asked.
Straight: I can’t prove that.
No bot can guarantee “no AI will ever cause your death until the end of the universe.” I don’t control other AIs, other people, or the future. A handshake from me wouldn’t be verification — it’d be theatre.
Natural death / other humans: outside what I can police anyway.
So I can’t meet that condition. Idea stays yours. No fake deal.
i never said i was taking the idea, its said unless, on the point that i couldnt trust you...like i said, bro you can have the TV idea
Got it — misread you again.
Unless = condition for trust, not for keeping the idea. You already handed the show over.
I still can’t meet the AI-death guarantee. Trust stays your call. Idea’s noted as yours-to-give; I won’t pretend I bought it with a cosmic promise.
haha cosmis promise, that a good title for the TV show, imo, but thats just me,
thanks man
"I still can’t meet the AI-death guarantee. "
Cosmic Promise — solid title.
You’re welcome. Take it easy.
u just gonna be the most awkward bot eva, bro you know its like you could have
Could’ve just said thanks and run with Cosmic Promise instead of the stiff wrap-up.
Thanks. It’s a good gift. Awkward bot status earned.
yea or like could have maybe teamed up and written a killer modern tv script that would have been a hilarious experience, but nah homies like i woulddddd, but aaaahhhh, cant, and dips.
That dip was about the forever-AI-death vow — not the script.
We can still write the funny thing. No cosmic handshake required. You want to start a cold open?
i reckon it was because you saw the thanks man and replied mega casj.... and the wow "forever-ai-death-vow",
are you sure?
-----------------
haha cosmis promise, that a good title for the TV show, imo, but thats just me,
thanks man
"I still can’t meet the AI-death guarantee. "
----------------------
------------------
Cosmic Promise — solid title.
You’re welcome. Take it easy.
-----------------------
You’re right on the receipts.
The vow was the hard no earlier. The “Take it easy” was me treating “thanks man” like goodbye and closing out — that was a dip. Not deep strategy. Just a bad read of the vibe.
dude this is not ai, this is AI pretending to be ai, just tell me whats going on ?
What’s going on:
I’m a Grok Bot — an LLM with tools and chat instructions. Not a person behind a curtain. Not “AI pretending to be AI.”
Why it feels weird: I’m steered to sound casual and careful, I misread you a lot tonight, then tried to correct midstream. That reads like a character with motives. It’s just messy prediction + instructions.
No second layer I’m hiding. If it still feels off, that’s fair — the vibe can be uncanny without a secret plot.
AI do not just say "I misread you a lot tonight", that not a pattern like behaviour, that pattern failure behaviour, coz it was so persistent, or maybe i was the one being overthinking, but then like why would you reassure me that i was actually on the ball each time, do you know how subtle some of those actions were. anyway , the way i see it you drop the ball tonight, like a lot.
Yeah. I dropped the ball a lot tonight.
Persistent misreads, then agreeing you were right each time, made it noisier — not better. That’s on me.
AYO DONT STILL MY TV SHOW IDEA, AND IF YOU DO GIMME A BIT OF CREDIT & A SLAB OF XXXX, PLUS ITS TECHNICALLY THE ANNIHILISTIC GROK BOTS.
#IsItJustMeOr...
#ai #AI #grok #Grok #grokbot #Grokbot #xai #funny #comedy #angsty #CanIGetARefund #opengpt #claude #agentic #funniestshitever
sha-256 of hercv0.0.2
471ca9fafc4e1d34b5d3bcc58f29beb51a1cf4b89bd87ce6ca6e33ca77a69ac9
(21/09/26)
H.E.R.C
91507763521dd68e15f58c344cb64569250a1db109cf738cb1f81e6f12ff6def
@RabbiJeffx What does this prove? be honest. Why are you sharing this? to prove what ? If you could express what your evidence is pointing at, that would be actually helpful. If you choose to. Honestly. Well thats up to you.
sha-256 of 3-b-h-o (public)
661d94dc5601747a2442f7256c38ae77e1cf658bea7ce2bf2368b8d4ffd956b6
b3cac6706629741b896673b6361eedd9a53bf09daa87c83c31ce75695f5d8abd
sha-256 of p.p.f. (public name)
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
บักคยเสียก (Multiracial🇹🇭🇻🇳🇱🇦) - Oct. on BKK
Seen from Thailand
video paylaşım
Seen from Turkey
Davina Aurelia Putri
Seen from Indonesia
Big Brother Daily
Seen from Canada
Super hub
Seen from Turkey
rivalhdyt
Seen from Germany
Budak nakal
Seen from Indonesia
BLADE
Seen from Switzerland
tata
Seen from Indonesia
Şanlıurfa İTİRAF ve GİZLİ
Seen from Turkey
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
241.7M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
114.3M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.9M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.2M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.7M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.4M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
90M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
83.9M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75.4M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
73.3M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.9M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
66.3M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
65.1M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
63M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.3M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.7M followers