HOW MANY ARE TOO MANY?
Did you ever hear about Jeiver’s preventable death? Of course not, that’s why I do this.
I’ve now posted the deaths of 1,368 people killed or allegedly killed by an illegal. MSM doesn’t report them because it doesn’t fit their ideology.
Please repost so Jeiver isn’t forgotten and inform people of his preventable death.
I’m not making money do this, I’m not writing a book, I’m not making a documentary, etc. There’s nothing in this for me. I see what’s happening to our country and I’m trying to do something about it.
I post a photo of the victim so you can see that these preventable deaths happened to real people, to real children & families that had their lives taken from them by someone illegally in our country.
@RepMarkHarrisNC@KatieZacharia@AlexisMcAdamsTV@RepBrandonGill@cptcookswife@clmuseum@JordanBrace8@PatriotGal480@poconomtngirl@browngravy_93@GeorgeEliseo@greyman7107@ZeroDarkKitty
.@USAttyEssayli tells me federal election fraud charges WILL SOON be brought against people in California:
“It will be election fraud charges in the next, I hate to put timelines on things, one to two months, I believe. We need some of these results to be certified so we can prove some of the allegations. But we will be charging some people.
What we need right now are witnesses.”
They would have to fake it pretty hard to get Trump‘s endorsement at this point. There are always races where two bad candidates have been put forward, and Trump usually waits till the last minute to endorse in those cases. And there are always turncoats like Joe Kent or Mike Pence, who wait till it really matters to do their dirty work. There is virtually no way to filter those out. But the worst RINOs hate Trump with a passion and do not seek his endorsement.
So sometimes we are talking about degrees of RINOs.
In Nevada, we almost elected a stealth RINO, but the Democrats cheated and he lost. That was an example where certain people like Laura Loomer were exposing him well, but average voters either were not aware or brushed it off - literally McConnell and Pritzker funded!
Can someone explain something to me...
If California has fraud elections, and through those fraud elections, have been able to elect representatives to Federal positions that disenfranchise voters in 49 other states... why hasn't the Supreme Court intervened to stop this?
California really outdid itself this time. In a stunning display of strength and confidence, the state’s political machine decided the best way to handle Spencer Pratt was to smother him in the primary before he could make the general election “uncomfortable.”
Nothing says “we’re totally in control” like rigging a no-name progressive into second place just to avoid letting one reality star with decent ads stand next to Karen Bass for five months. Brilliant. Very democratic. Very normal behavior from a system that definitely doesn’t rely on fraud to survive.
They couldn’t risk it. Couldn’t risk five more months of Pratt using AI ads to point out that Los Angeles is a collapsing disaster while offering the radical idea of maybe not letting it burn. Couldn’t risk him making crime, homelessness, and open corruption look like solvable problems instead of permanent features of one-party rule. So they pulled the plug early and called it a victory.
This is the kind of move you make when you’re terrified of your own voters seeing what an actual alternative looks like. They didn’t just beat Pratt. They had to erase him from the conversation entirely, because apparently even a long-shot campaign run by an outsider was too much of a threat to the carefully maintained atmosphere of learned helplessness.
Congratulations, California. You successfully defended your right to keep running the worst major city in America without anyone asking too many questions.
What a flex.
(article below)
I think @Elex_Michaelson is a first-rate journalist who does ask tough questions of both the right or the left - and is trying to be responsible and responsive. He's fair and thoughtful.
BUT - talking to some people on the ground isn't the same as being in the mix.
I have walked 1000's of precincts and talked to 100's of thousands of voters of all political parties, ages, races, and geographies in CA - and other states. I have been an election observer in dozens of ROVs. I have challenged signature verifications (both improper validation and opposing unfair invalidation). I have watched ballot curing (where election workers "redo" damaged, unreadable, or improperly completed ballots) and run curing operations for unsigned/unmatched ballots.
I can say without hysteria that there are irregularities and vulnerabilities in CA's voting system. I can say unequivocally there are bad actors who are willing & motivated to cheat (and yes, because they think they are on the side of righteousness.) And, I have witnessed actual cheating.
I have been involved in elections where the outcome was determined by 3, 5, 7, 14, 29, and 41 votes. I have been in elections where the outcome was determined by less than 0.01% of the vote. I have been involved in recounts where the "final" vote totals changed by 100's of votes after the recount.
I canNOT say that any of those outcomes were determined as a result of fraud or irregularities. But we cannot be sure they did not - in part because CA lacks proper controls, allows questionable practices (anonymous ballot harvesting), has inadequate safeguards & auditing processes - BUT MOSTLY because too many people are eager to say "it can't happen" or blythly condemn those who see something that doesn't ring true and are willing to speak out.
The "experts" and "election officials" ignored the red flags in the Shakir Khan case - until a tip from a citizen (and the connection to other crimes) led police to raid his home where they found 40 ballots and discovered that he had registered 70 people to his home address (the statewide voter roll should have flagged this already.). Does it happen often? Maybe, maybe not - but the potential and the vulnerabilities exist. The motivation exists (especially today when rhetoric like "he's an existential threat," "our lives are on the line," and "existence of democracy is at stake" are tossed around with reckless abandon.)
Fixing the problems won't deny access for any eager voter... it won't silence one vote. But it will reduce doubt and mistrust.
SpaceX has released a new 30 minute interview with Elon Musk to talk about AI satellites, manufacturing and more.
It was filmed at SpaceX Starlink terminal factory in Bastrop, Texas.
Latin America since USAID defunding:
🇨🇱 Kast ("far right") wins in Chile
🇧🇴 Paz ("far right") wins in Bolivia
🇵🇪 Fujimori ("far right") wins in Peru
🇪🇨 Noboa ("far right") wins in Ecuador
🇭🇳 Asfura ("far right") wins in Honduras
🇨🇷 Fernandez ("far right") wins in Costa Rica
Extremely telling development
California has been awarded $296,305,593 in federal funding through H.A.V.A section 251 funding.
7.5% of section 251 funding is for voter list maintenance.
Congress has the authority and discretion to prohibit or limit this funding going forward.
@spencerpratt@VeraKosa Just let us know what we need to do to help the good fight! As a quadriplegic for over 30 years, I got into my wheelchair and voted three days early at my local voting center.
In my opinion, something very wrong is going on, and it needs to be addressed ASAP!
🤔🫢🤯😡🤬