Honestly, when I was your age, I didn’t have half the courage and resolve that you have displayed.
Walking with you gives us strength and hope!
You are a star @neha_aisa
We should call him the “Reel PM”: everything he does is for maximum reel exposure. He’s superbly successful at it and has “reels” on his mind all the time.
It is official. Modi ji is afraid of the mike.
India reportedly made a specific request on behalf of the most confident PM of India, no press conference after the Trump–Modi meeting on the sidelines of the G7.
Perhaps that shouldn’t surprise anyone. The much-advertised “56-inch” leadership seems remarkably uncomfortable with unscripted questions and public scrutiny.
In nearly 13 years as NaMo has largely avoided the kind of regular, open press conferences where journalists can freely question the head of government and ask follow-ups.
For a government that speaks endlessly about confidence, strength and accountability, why be so afraid of a microphone without a script?
@PriyankKharge Yes truth stands clear far from error
We have been taken for ride by the fake narrative and today we are seeing the total mismanagement unfold one by one.
Karnataka Congress is waging war against RSS.
After @PriyankKharge now KPCC President @HariprasadBK2 wants RSS to provide Details.
He said every organisation in India has to work as per the constitution and they also should
https://t.co/eXZWKOsrON
The RSS must clarify its legal status, registration, office bearers, funding, expenditure, taxation and permissions for public activities.
If everyone complies with the law, why should the RSS remain exempt?
Brilliant move @PriyankKharge ji
Priyank Kharge Writes to RSS Chief, Seeks Details About Sources of Donations, Income, Tax Paid
Kharge said that the RSS cannot ask ordinary Indians to follow rules while exempting itself from the same standards.
https://t.co/vuX4bqjTut
Dear Shri Mohan Bhagwat ji,
My letter will reach you shortly. However, I thought it was important to draw your attention to this matter early.
——————————-
Firstly, congratulations to the RSS on completing 100 years.
An organisation that claims over 60,000 shakhas and crores of swayamsevaks must also uphold transparency and constitutional accountability.
As per RSS’ highest and most important decision making body Akhil Bharatiya Pratinidhi Sabha’s 2025–26 Karnataka report, the RSS has 4,127 daily shakhas, 1,389 weekly milans, 60 monthly mandalis, 2,194 Samajotsavas with 19.61 lakh participants and held 562 route marches with 2.21 lakh uniformed participants in the state.
With such scale and influence, the RSS must clarify its legal status, registration, office bearers, funding, expenditure, taxation and permissions for public activities.
If citizens, labour, NGOs, trusts, temples and companies are expected to register, disclose and comply with the law, why should the RSS remain exempt?
In its centenary year, the RSS must responsibly abide by the Constitution and register, disclose, pay applicable taxes and function transparently within the Constitution.
As suggested in my letter, I am looking forward to hearing from @RSSorg soon.
@DrMohanBhagwat@RSSorg
A video of @DrMohanBhagwat ji is being widely circulated as a response to my letter is false.
I dispatched my letter and put it up on social media on June 15, while this interaction by the RSS Chief was on June 13/14.
Let me set the record straight.
The RSS has every right to be a cultural organization. That is their choice. But it cannot simultaneously exercise enormous social and political influence while repeatedly insisting that it has no political agenda and therefore owes no public accountability. The BJP itself acknowledges the RSS as its ideological parent and their sway over public life is undeniable.
The RSS receives donations through a vast ecosystem of 2500+ affiliated organisations, both domestic and overseas and operates out of a sprawling headquarters in the national capital and other State capitals.
The RSS chief enjoys Advanced Security Liaison protocol and other people of RSS have protocols funded by the taxpayer and the public is entitled to know whether the organisation complies with the same legal standards expected of everyone else.
Formal recognition under law would settle this contradiction once and for all.
The argument that a religion cannot be registered and therefore the RSS need not be registered is both flawed and absurd. The RSS cannot be considered to be representing any religion when they themselves are only 100 years in existence and no Government has asked any religion to be registered.
I have no objection to the RSS carrying out cultural, social, political or any other lawful activity. It can run schools, service organisations, think tanks or even a music academy if it chooses. The only expectation is that it functions transparently and within the framework of the law, like every other organised body in this country. It is pursuant to this principle that a formal response has been requested in writing.
Above all, Mr. Bhagwat's immediate assertion that the RSS is under no obligation to answer any questions is the most troubling (while he enjoys every protocol on tax payers money), It reflects a mindset that public accountability is optional and that the organisation stands above legal scrutiny.
In a constitutional democracy, no institution, however old or influential, enjoys that privilege.
Shun the arrogance, follow the law and have your “office bearers” or “legal heads” come and explain to me.
Jai Samvidhan.
Jai Hindu.