“I FEEL”
And while we’re rewriting the law, I have another rule.
The first time anybody in a position of authority begins a sentence with “I feel,” they should be immediately removed from office.
That’s it. Hand over your badge, your gavel, your office keys and your little nameplate.
“I feel” is not evidence. It’s weather inside your head.
You feel cold? Get a sweater.
You feel hungry? Get a sandwich.
You feel unheard? Start a podcast. Apparently, that’s what everybody else did.
But if you’re making decisions that affect other people’s children, freedom, money or lives, I don’t care how you feel.
I want to know what you know.
A judge says, “I feel the defendant deserves another chance.”
Bailiff, take the gavel. Court is adjourned. This has turned into group therapy.
A politician says, “I feel this new law will help society.”
How?
“I don’t know. I just feel it.”
Wonderful. We’re now governing the country with the same system women use to decide whether their boyfriend is cheating.
“I don’t have any evidence. I just feel like something is different.”
A police chief says, “I feel this policy will make the community safer.”
We gave you a badge, not a vision board.
A president says, “I feel we need to launch the missiles.”
Take away the nuclear football and give them a mood ring.
If your job title contains President, Governor, Judge, Chief, Commander, Director of anything, or HR you don’t get to make decisions based on feelings. You need facts, evidence, experience and judgment.
And this connects right back to the Lindsay Clancy case.
Because if “I feel” and “my emotions overwhelmed me” can excuse the worst decision a human being can possibly make, then feelings cannot also qualify you to make decisions for everybody else.
You cannot say emotions are powerful enough to remove responsibility—but never powerful enough to affect judgment.
Pick one.
We used to look for leaders with sound judgment.
Now we look for somebody with emotional truth, lived experience and really strong feelings.
That’s not a government.
That’s a Facebook moms’ group with nuclear weapons.
If Lindsay Clancy is found innocent because hormones made her emotionally unstable, women better be very careful celebrating that verdict.
Because the law loves PRECEDENT.
From that day forward, every job application is going to have a new question:
“Are you currently hormonal?”
“Well, I’m a woman.”
“Thank you. I think we’ll be going in another direction.”
You can’t carry a weapon anymore. No female police officers. Sorry, but we cannot hand a loaded gun to somebody whose legal defense might eventually be, “My hormones were acting up.”
No more high-stress jobs, either. No air-traffic controllers. No surgeons. No nuclear-launch codes. One bad hot flash and boom 💥 Canada is glowing.
And women definitely can’t be judges. How can you decide whether somebody else is emotionally stable when your own gender just established in court that hormones can make you kill three people?
No female politicians, either. You can’t be trusted to run the country if, according to your own argument, your endocrine system occasionally takes over the government.
And custody hearings are going to change overnight.
The judge will say, “Ordinarily, children belong with their mother. However, according to the Lindsay Clancy precedent, she may be only one hormone away from a Netflix documentary. The children go with Dad.”
Dad doesn’t know their shoe sizes, the pediatrician’s name or which one is allergic to peanuts, but his testosterone has never been successfully used as an insanity defense.
Feminists spent a hundred years saying women are not hysterical, irrational creatures controlled by their biology and one defense attorney walks into court and says, “Ladies and gentlemen of the jury… have you considered the uterus?”
You cannot demand equal authority and then ask for discounted accountability.
If women want equal rights, great. But equal rights come with equal wrongs.
Otherwise, that glass ceiling is about to become a padded ceiling.
Get ready… Because this will chill you to the bone.
In 1998, in Zandvoort, Netherlands, an unexpected discovery was made: CD-ROMs filled with thousands of files containing images and videos of babies and young children being raped, tortured, and murdered in the most sadistic and brutal ways imaginable.
This is not a theory. It is irrefutable proof of the depravity of the pedophile and degenerate elite that governs us… and of everything they are willing to hide.
😐🚨📢🇪🇺☪️Mientras la Unión Europea, esa maquinaria woke y globalista, intenta censurar y prohibir películas que no se arrodillan ante su agenda pro-crimen y anti-justicia, los verdaderos defensores de la ley y el orden no nos callamos. En plena era de cancelaciones, donde la izquierda europea quiere borrar todo lo que huela a heroísmo masculino, fronteras seguras y castigo real a los delincuentes, aquí les traigo esta bomba de verdad: Citizen Vigilante Full Movie ¡Una oda sin complejos a la justicia verdadera! La justicia del ciudadano decente que se harta de que los políticos protejan a los criminales y pisoteen a las víctimas. ¡Compártelo antes de que Bruselas lo prohíba!
#CitizenVigilante #JusticiaVerdadera #AntiWoke #EuropaWoke #NoMasCensura #VigilanteCiudadano #LeyYOrden #HeroismoMasculino #FronterasSeguras #AntiGlobalista #BruselasCensura #PeliculaProhibida #DerechoADefenderse #CancelCulture #VerdadSinFiltro
Expanding the network: Tate brothers, Dave Smith, Max Blumenthal, Tucker Carlson, Mel (@Villgecrazylady) and more will have legal files and personal text messages related to my time at Turning Point, PragerU, and Daily Wire, plus my private conversations with people like Seth Dillon and Dave Rubin.
These people have my EXPLICIT permission to release everything publicly if anything happens to me.
Charlie’s death and the audacity of the people like Josh Hammer eulogizing him means we must all share information and let the truth rise up like a lion.
Val Kilmer as Doc Holliday in Tombstone was Oscar-worthy. Kilmer fully-committed in every way, down to his weight loss. I can’t picture anyone else as Doc Holliday.