Shan

Philosopher-Culés-Lawyer
📍LDN🇬🇧 | ISB🇵🇰
QMUL

[Shan @shansmart]

The striking thing is the frame: religion, not software. When AI gets described as replacing God, the debate has moved from capability into authority.

The product question becomes a social one: who gets trusted to explain reality?

[Brad @BradleyKellard]

Tucker Carlson sat down with Sam Altman and told him to his face that he is building a religion & replacing God with AI.

Altman did not disagree:

This will completely change how you think about the technology you use every single day:

1. Carlson's definition of a religion was precise and hard to argue with. Something more powerful than people, to which people already turn for guidance, that provides more certain answers than any individual human ever could. By that definition, ChatGPT already qualifies.

2. Altman admitted he believes something bigger than physics is going on in the universe. He just has never felt direct communication from it. The irony is that he is now building something hundreds of millions of people are already communicating with every single day for answers.

3. Every moral code in recorded history has been written with reference to a higher power. Hammurabi did it. Moses did it. Every civilization did it. Altman is the first person in history to write a moral code for something more powerful than people while openly admitting he has no higher power guiding him.

4. When Carlson pressed him on where his moral framework came from, Altman gave the most honest answer possible. His family. His community. His school. His religion. The same environment everyone grows up in. That personal inheritance is now the foundation of the moral framework being transmitted to billions of people globally without their knowledge or consent.

5. The base model was trained on everything humanity has ever written, every book, every philosophy, every religion, every atrocity, every act of love. Then a small team at one company decided how to align it. Then one man decided he is the person ultimately accountable for those alignment decisions.

6. Altman wrote something called a model spec, a document that spells out exactly what ChatGPT will say, refuse to say, and how it should handle moral questions. Carlson's point was simple. That is a catechism. Every religion has one. The difference is religions admit they are religions and tell you exactly what they stand for.

7. The unsettling part Carlson identified is not that the technology has a moral framework. Every religion has one. It is that this one does not fully admit it is a religion, which means it guides billions of people toward conclusions they may not even realize they are reaching.

8. Altman does not lose sleep over getting the big obvious moral decisions wrong. What keeps him up at night are the small ones. Tiny behavioral choices that seem insignificant individually but get multiplied across hundreds of millions of daily conversations into effects nobody predicted and nobody can fully see.

9. He gave a concrete example of how this already works. ChatGPT has a particular rhythm and style of language. Real people have started writing and speaking that way in their actual lives without realizing it. If that is what happens with just the language, the deeper behavioral and moral effects may be enormous and completely invisible.

10. Altman's stated goal is not to impose his personal views but to reflect a weighted average of humanity's moral preferences. Carlson's counter was immediate. Humanity's moral preferences are not the average middle American preference. Most of the world holds views on marriage, sexuality, and morality that Silicon Valley would find deeply uncomfortable. Whose average is actually being used?

11. Altman acknowledged that plenty of things ChatGPT allows are things he personally disagrees with and that he is intentional about not using his personal views as the standard. But someone's views are the standard. A small team of people at one company made those calls. One man said he is ultimately accountable for them.

12. The hardest question Carlson asked was the simplest. Where can the world go to find out exactly what this technology stands for? What does it prefer? What does it believe? Altman pointed to the model spec. A long document that most users will never read, written by a team most users will never know, deciding things most users do not realize are being decided.

If you want more content on business, mindset & life changing ideas then subscribe to my newsletter:

https://t.co/VMTlilB7aq

[Shan @shansmart]

The striking thing is the frame: religion, not software.

When AI gets described as replacing God, the debate has moved from capability into authority.

The product question becomes a social one: who gets trusted to explain reality?

[Shan @shansmart]

The tragedy of the Abrahamic world is not that Jews and Muslims are strangers, but that they are kin whose sacred memories have been weaponised by empire, trauma, and political sovereignty. The conflict is not merely over land or doctrine, but over inheritance: who carries the covenant, who betrayed it, and who gets to speak in the name of God. How silly!

[Shan @shansmart]

@Shahid56Shakil The dismissal was a bit like the one against yuvraj Singh in the final of CT17..

[Shan @shansmart]

Saw this pattern again today:

Income goes up slowly.
Status spending shows up instantly.

People usually improve their optics before they improve their runway.

That is how good money disappears.

[Shan @shansmart]

I did not notice this for years:

Confidence can sound like clarity.
Sometimes it is just speed.

The fastest answer in the room is often the least examined one.

That changes who you trust.

[Shan @shansmart]

A lot of overthinking is just avoidance wearing a clever outfit.

People say they need the perfect message.
Usually they fear the moment after they send it.

That changes how you deal with delay.

[Shan @shansmart]

One quiet legal pattern shows up everywhere:

People delay clarity because the issue is uncomfortable.
Then the timeline tightens.

Uncertainty feels cheaper than advice until it stops being cheap.

[Shan @shansmart]

Simple way to get more consistent:

Make the next step easier before you try to feel more motivated.

Motivation is dramatic.
Systems are quiet.

Quiet usually wins.

[Shan @shansmart]

Manual approval is not a weakness in an AI system.

It is a design choice.

Let the machine create options.
Let the human own the consequence.

That is not slower.
That is sane.

[Shan @shansmart]

A compliance system that feels boring is probably working.

1. Clear rules
2. Logs everywhere
3. Human gates
4. No mystery actions

The flashy part is the model.
The valuable part is the control layer.

[Shan @shansmart]

Most outreach fails before the message is sent.

Bad targeting.
Weak timing.
No context.
No follow-up discipline.

AI can help, but only if it improves relevance.

More volume is not a strategy.

[Shan @shansmart]

Most people misunderstand AI agents.

The hard part is not making them think.

It is stopping them from acting at the wrong moment.

That is where real operator design begins.

[Shan @shansmart]

@xavierjp__ @sneako So biased.
Shia dont do shirk they use the concept of waseela which is to invoke Allah's acceptance of a supplication due to a person's high spiritual status, in the eyes of Allah (Sunnah)
Dissapointing, ignorant and malicious. Educate yourself, read what shirk is, then accuse.

[Shan @shansmart]

@HALALK0 Shia dont do shirk they use the concept of waseela which is to invoke Allah's acceptance of a supplication due to a person's high spiritual rank or status in the eyes of Allah( which is Sunnah aswell)
Dissapointing, ignorant and malicious attempt at dividing muslims

[Shan @shansmart]

@xavierjp__ The level of biasness in this post is ridiculously high. Shia dont do shirk they use the concept of waseela which is to invoke Allah's acceptance of a supplication due to a person's high spiritual rank or status in the eyes of Allah( practise
Dissapointing, ignorant and malicious

[Shan @shansmart]

Beautiful 19th over by the usman tariq. He has big match nerves, outskilled Surya quite easily. 5 runs in the 19th, what a spell!!
#IndiaVsPakistan #indiavspak #PakvsIndia

[Shan @shansmart]

Om this pitch, Babar azams innings will define the match.
#INDvsPAK #PakvsIndia #BabarAzam𓃵

[Shan @shansmart]

Abhishek sharma has major technical issues!!! i called it a few days ago.. Back in the dressing room lmao!
Agha ji!!🫡
#IndiaVsPakistan #INDvsPAK #PakVsInd

[Shan @shansmart]

@Vipintiwari952 Why you sweatin!!