sharedwave

ever evolving • research and reflections • investigating human design since 2014

[sharedwave @sharedwave]

Saturn is highly benevolent, but the mind often views it as an enemy because Saturn wants us to be ourselves and remain within our healthy and natural physical limitations. The mind is prone to being overly concerned with the outside because that's what it sees most. Saturn is the boundaries of the form. Saturn says, here is your shape and here is how your shape fits into the fabric.

[sharedwave @sharedwave]

This is part of the mutation process of 6 line/color/tone geometry, not expressed clearly enough in the source material imo. 6 is the space for something new to take hold, or not.

[Human Design System Pro @KipWinsett]

It’s an interesting little quirk of energy here. Quite often, a 6th line is wise. Quite often, it’s not. That’s part of the whole dichotomy, the whole duality, the this and the that.

[sharedwave @sharedwave]

@KipWinsett Sometimes the mutation takes, sometimes it doesn't.

[sharedwave @sharedwave]

Uranus in Gemini is gonna be lit af

[sharedwave @sharedwave]

64-47: thinking suppression
-tries to "get ahead" of thinking by creating stories
-abstract; to (be) remove(d)
-oppress/suppress ideas in the story
-anxious/idealistic.

61-24: thinking now
-sits in the seat of thought
-neutral/"geometric" rationalization -ow/now/know
-melancholic/empowered

64-4: thinking compression
-strives to account for all thinking
-attempting certainty/accuracy about future by considering "all" relevant previous data
-cynical/optimistic
-by its external focused nature the logic still excludes/removes because it's focused on all data and all data is not available to it for many reasons but the most obvious of which is that the abstract process is omitting lots of emotional truths from the collective record.

64-47 and 63-4 are meant to seem imbalanced on their own, they are, that's their nature. The logical and abstract sides of collective crown/ajna. They are meant to balance one another out, not to self-balance the way the 61-24 does.

[sharedwave @sharedwave]

64-47: thinking suppression
-tries to "get ahead" of thinking by creating stories
-abstract; to (be) remove(d)
-oppress/suppress ideas in the story
-anxious/idealistic.

61-24: thinking now
-sits in the seat of thought
-neutral/"geometric" rationalization -ow/now/know
-melancholic/empowered

64-4: thinking compression
-strives to account for all thinking
-attempting certainty/accuracy about future by considering "all" relevant previous data
-cynical/optimistic
-by its external focused nature the logic still excludes/removes because it's focused on all data and all data is not available to it for many reasons but the most obvious of which is that the abstract process is omitting lots of emotional truths from the collective record.

64-47 and 63-4 are meant to seem imbalanced on their own, they are, that's their nature. The logical and abstract sides of collective crown/ajna. They are meant to balance one another out, not to self-balance the way the 61-24 does.

[sharedwave @sharedwave]

Elon often says "fate is an irony maxxer". Assuming he's never studied human design (probably a safe assumption) then I find this to be one of those can't-make-this-stuff-up situations. Gate 30 is considered the gate of the fates and the 5th line of gate 30 is keynoted as "irony". The 5th line is known as the pinnacle of a gate, i.e. the maximum.

I love when non HD people keynote themselves or broader concepts which RA/HD has precisely identified.

[sharedwave @sharedwave]

The Sun Venus Mars conjunction in gate 54 right now is nuts.

Incredible amounts of transformation occurring for the tribal circuit at this time. Recognition, love, action. Safety.

[sharedwave @sharedwave]

I have an occasional ongoing debate with a friend who is very much in the "it's all mind camp". In one sense I do understand what he's getting at, and to a degree there's correctness to what he's saying but ultimately this belief misses some marks and cannot be applied universally.

The mind is a magical tool that can influence reality in a very real and powerful way and it can be used consciously to do so. That said, the materials it has, the mental resources to do this, are not entirely "mind". The mind can't necessarily control everything it accumulates.

Yes we can take the ingredients that we measure from the outside and use them creatively, however we don't get to choose all the ingredients we are given. Due to the form of life, we don't get to choose all of the things that our mind is capable of taking in, holding onto, or creating.

Our physical selves, our environment, and the other people and ideas surrounding us provide the grid for our mind to interface with. Our mind is not nebulous nor available for any pattern. Mind has defined geometry. Maybe in other layers of mind or within the universal mind there are other possible patterns that have different capacities, but our awareness is here experiencing the human mind as an aspect of the human form and the human form and mind have defined geometric structures.

Our awareness can't escape the geometry of mind that is defined by this human form. That is, even if we are given the dataset A-Z our mind might only be able to take in A, F, G, L and Y.

So the "it's all mind" message has limitations. Yes, all of our waking time is experienced on the mental plane, and yes we have an immense amount of conscious power to use our minds and their resources as tools for "manifestation". However, when people spread the "you just have to think differently and that will fix it" narrative, many times the person being told this actually cannot think differently.

Obviously we don't want to disempower people and tell them that they'll never be able to think differently. This isn't about swinging the pendulum all the way to the other side of disempowerment, it's about finding neutrality and a more nuanced understanding of the spectrum of mind.

The "it's all mind" mantra can end up feeling disempowering and/or dismissive of the unique experiences and unique mental resources that people have.

Yes, "it's all mind", but only with what mind you have, and what mind you have is not mind at all. The mind you have is built out of an inescapable relationship with form.

[sharedwave @sharedwave]

@Foscadegen It's certainly something that I've begun to wonder about.

[sharedwave @sharedwave]

I think there's a magic to viewing the lines
through the gates rather than the gates through the lines.

What does the 2nd line do when it listens (gate 13), when it provokes (39), when it fights (38), when it corrects (18), when it controls (21).

What does the 4th line do when it leads the collective (7), when it leads the trice (45), when it expresses how it feels (35), when it waits (5).

How do each of the lines deal with feelings (30), with crisis (36), with depth (48).

And on and on.

We are programmed from the bottom up so we really do move from line into gate, not from gate into line.

[sharedwave @sharedwave]

To be clear, I'm not saying that the ego "generates" life force energy in the way the sacral does. Generation is implicitly automatic. The ego is willful and will is not automatic.

[sharedwave @sharedwave]

This is a hypothesis but I'm very confident in my observations of this pattern:

The ego/will center appears to also be an access point to the same creative life force of the sacral. Except it is an active/conscious access point where the awareness has the perfect angle on this creative life force to be able to consistently influence and/or control it without distorting or excessively damaging oneself.

The ego doesn't exist in the same kind of flow with that force, it's not as automatic and therefore it requires more rest, but it does appear in touch with that same creative force for which the sacral is the primary, most abundant, and most autonomous access point.

If creative life force were to be visualized as a torus, the sacral would be an out-in-out flow/rotation with the life force and the ego would be an in-out-in flow/rotation.

In this thought experiment. The sacral has 9 Gates responsible for the out-in-out flow whereas the ego only has four gates which would need to be exerting an equal amount of in-out-in to balance the energy system. I think this is perfectly demonstrated in the power of the ego's gates. There's a reason this is the top of the conditioning hierarchy. We're here competing for survival and these are the most powerful gates. If you're competing for survival, the highest conditioning components are going to be the things that allow you to compete the best for said survival. This is also visible in its keynotes "The will to be in control", "the will to be first", "the will to be the best", "the will to provide". These are very dominant forces which often succeed against overwhelming odds.

A major thing that sets these centers apart is signature. The ego consists of projected channels and one manifested channel whereas the sacral consists of only generated channels (one of which is a manifesting generated channel). This creates a difference in signatures. The ego does not experience nor transmit satisfaction. Think about how important this frequency is as a function of life force and as part of the conditioning field. The ego will often love what it does because of what it gets for doing what it does. The sacral will love what it does because it loves doing what it does, period. What it gets for that is just a bonus to the satisfaction it feels from doing it. This is peak efficiency. The sacral is in response to the environment. Out-in-out. Always responding and therefore always max efficiency. It does more action with less energy. 2 outs for every in vs 1 out for every 2 ins.

Neither is better than the other, I'm not creating value statements. I mean we are looking at hierarchies, but you can always look at hierarchies from a different angle and reposition ranks. The sacral is better at X and the ego is better at Y and the sacral is better at B and the ego is better A, and on and on.

My intention here is just to explore the different dimensions of creative life force that I see being brought into the world through both the sacral and the ego/will.

[sharedwave @sharedwave]

@mycommedy @formattunement August 5th

[sharedwave @sharedwave]

The north node in gate 22 line 2 these past couple months could have generated some unrealistic enchantments. Delusions of capacity.

If so, it's possible that when it moves into the 1st line tonight, any of these that are opposed to your nature may be revealed and cleansed.

[sharedwave @sharedwave]

Possible key to desire motivation is only desiring that which makes you feel powerful.

Try it?

[sharedwave @sharedwave]

Message for 3/5s:

It's okay to express what doesn't work, to express pessimism about things when it feels true. The potential insidiousness of the 5th line projection is that it may convince you to believe you need to be perfect and good and positive all the time. Yes ultimately the goal is to upshift frequency, but if you don't acknowledge and at times vent out the pessimism about your discoveries of what is broken and what needs to be broken down and renewed, then you can't actually transmute the frequency of that thing.

If you don't face the pessimism, you're just bypassing it, even if you're bypassing it under a guise of positivity. This really goes for anyone and everyone, but I see it as a part of the 3/5 process the most. I know so many 3/5s who try to perpetually remain in a hyper-positive state, they'll even go as far as to police the pessimism of others because it triggers their avoidance of their own pessimism due to an over identification with that one frequency-perfecting aspect of the projection field of their 5th line.

Of course on the flip side, 3/5s can also go into an overly pessimistic self-destruct mode where they don't spend enough time upshifting and simply exist in endless pessimistic/anarchistic feedback loops. This however seems much less common, at least in the spiritual and growth oriented circles I run in.

[sharedwave @sharedwave]

I feel like noting the Earth as human design does emphasizes that there's a significant difference between a night chart and a day chart. I know this is something that astrology discusses quite a bit. It seems the most logical physical reason for that is that night charts don't experience any unfiltered sun, and day charts do. That's a pretty significant difference if you ask me.

[sharedwave @sharedwave]

It's possible I've overlooked how much my 35-36 values sharing with gate 13