@Munchkinsnana@TheSCIF It was stopped. It was admitted as stopped back then. This phenomenon of calling it slowed as you did is a recent invention and is only made possible by the fog of time.
Trump was so far ahead in the 2020 Election, that Democrats had to literally shut down the count, some even stopped in the middle of the day for no reason at all, and they had to cheat on top of already cheating in order for Biden to clear the margin of victory.
Every vote that came in when counting resumed was for Biden, which is statistically impossible. The 2020 election was stolen, and everybody knows it.
@TinCanFone@NormieUtah Over the past 6 years (starting with Biden's open borders) the national average home price has increased almost 55%, with an average annual increase of almost 9%.
Want to try again?
Britain now arrests more people for social media posts than China, Russia, and Turkey combined nearly matching the rest of the top 10 countries combined
Britain really leads the world on these thought crimes
Insane how the UK, which used to be a free country, turned out to be so totalitarian
A very sad announcement.
I have just been convicted a second time for 'hate speech' and it is only due to a technicality that I could not immediately be sent to jail โto the judge's frustration.
In an ironic turn of events it's actually thanks to my previous prison sentence (for memes in a private group chat) that I am now still free โin a physical sense, at least.
Call me naive but I didn't think they would take it this far, given that this precedent criminalises many of the arguments used by even the most moderate politicians critical of mass migration.
In February 2024 I gave a lecture at Catholic University Leuven wherein I linked mass migration to crime and a deterioration of our quality of life. Every single point I made was 100% the truth and based on scientific evidence.
Cynically, even the judge that convicted me admits as much by writing in his verdict: โEven if all of the statements made by Van Langenhove are based on scientific evidence and statistics, it makes no difference to the criminal intent. Van Langenhove is not charged with spreading false information. He is charged with presenting facts in a way that incites hatred against persons on the grounds of one or more of the protected criteria in the Anti-Racism Law.โ
That's a lot of words just to say he wants to send me to prison for speaking the truth.
Even the regime media write: "It did not matter to the court that Van Langenhove was quoting scientific sources. The judge argued that Van Langenhove's main message was that a big part of the societal problems like insecurity, housing shortages and lowering educational standards are due to mass migration."
You may think the regime media are being sympathetic to me in the first sentence, but in reality they are warning people: even if you speak the truth, if you go against our narrative, we will crush you in every way possible.
Both the public prosecutor and the judge did not present a single real argument as to how or against whom I would have incited hatred. So even if I would accept their crazy, dystopic law, I still did not break it.
The only argument they present is that I created a "hostile atmosphere of us versus themโ in regards to migrants. But even this silly argument (which is not even a punishable offence) is not true. To me, the deadly disease is self-hatred and one of its worst symptoms is replacement migration. My enemy is thus NOT the migrants themselves but those orchestrating the mass migration.
Sadly, in Belgium, evidence is not needed and โvibesโ are enough to put someone in jail.
Given the fact that I have another court case coming up in September and that I have a dozen active criminal investigations for hate speech, time is running out for me. I have already paid more than โฌ420,000 in legal fees and there is no ending in sight. I have been in an intense battle of attrition for eight years and must now regroup to make sure I can still win.
If you want to help me, you can do so via the links below. If you can help in other ways, please contact me via DM.
If you live in a country that still has free speech, never let them touch it, however noble they make the motives sound, because this is where it leads to.
@DefiyantlyFree Sounds like, I don't know, maybe what was done against Thomas Massie. You know, the single most Constitutionally focused member of Congress??
Wait, you were in that "RINO" slander train against him, right?
@GBNT1952 I keep seeing the criticism that none of his bills have become law.
Isn't that more of a criticism of the GOP colleagues who vote differently than they talk?
Name any of his bills that aren't good, solid, conservative bills.
@Milajoy Massie is one of the last constitutionalists in congress.
I think what you mean to say is the GOP is trump, which is why it is so far from constitutional constraints.
And I voted for him three times.