Shone 🌸

Retired nurse increasingly disillusioned with politics

[Alan @A1an_M]

This story is a good example of quite a number of things.
1. It's a good example of the poor quality of BBC "science journalism".
2. It's a good example of how big corporations and their interests have captured mainstream media.
3. It's a good example of why we really need independent social media (and why governments and large corporates, which have essentially merged together (into a form of corporatism as Mussolini define it) don't like social media and want it censored).

Let's look at what the story says. The headline says "Cervical cancer deaths fall to zero in young women given vaccine".

Specifically, they say "Between 2020 and 2024, no cervical cancer deaths were recorded in women aged 20 to 24 - the first time that had happened over a five-year period."

But routine vaccination of 13 year olds only started in 2018. So the earliest children vaccinated in 2018 would only have been 19 in 2024 at the end of their study period. And we know that even prior to vaccination starting, the number of deaths in 20 to 24 year olds was always close to zero (see graph). So the claim is misleading. Not factually incorrect, but giving a false impression. It's disinformation, in fact. Making us think the vaccine has caused a dramatic improvement, when it has not.

If we look at that graph, we can see that the trend is for deaths in all age groups to fall over time, a long time before vaccination started.

So the decline in deaths is clearly due to something else (routine cervical screening and earlier treatment being the prime candidate).

The BBC journalist who wrote this story has clearly put zero critical thinking into it. The company responsible for the HPV vaccine might as well have just written it verbatim and given it to the BBC to publish. Maybe they did?

Let's project ourselves into the future, where all social media users have to provide government ID to access social media, and governments can track who is posting what, and identify and single out "troublemakers", critics and whistle-blowers for their social media posts. Do you think they will stop at censoring and banning people breaking the law, or do you think they will tackle people who are merely criticising flaws in the narrative using data and evidence?

Well, we don't need to be Mystic Meg to imagine the future. We can just look back to 2020-1 and see what happened then. Exactly what I described. Government disinformation units tackling what they called "misinformation" and "disinformation" which turned out to be inconvenient truths about lockdowns, vaccines, masks, social distancing, government statistics.

So without social media, big corporations and governments can get away with pushing their propaganda through unquestioning mainstream media journalists. That's why we need independent social media.

As for the HPV vaccine: it might turn out to be a life-saver. But given that the first cohort of teenagers who received the vaccine in 2018 are now only 31, and the median age at diagnosis with cervical cancer is 45, we are not going to know for sure from empirical data for another decade or more.

There are also potential confounders here. In parallel with the introduction of the HPV vaccine for teenagers, cervical cancer screening processes have been changed. Screening is starting at a later age, and is now focusing on detecting HPV rather than directly looking for cancer, and increasing the intervals between screenings. These changes alone may well result in the appearance of less cancer in younger age groups, but risk a big spike in cancers being detected at a later age. The authorities are tilting the table in favour of the vaccine pushers in the short term, but possibly at the expense of women in the longer term.

And the other thing we will likely never know is whether the total effect on health from the HPV vaccination is a net positive. Little point in saving 20 cervical cancer deaths per 100,000 people if the vaccine itself is directly causing more than 20 deaths and chronic illnesses per 100,000 people from adverse effects.

Why won't we ever know this? Because long-term comparisons of death and illness from all causes between vaccinated people and those receiving a saline placebo is almost never done. Studies always look narrowly at the target disease alone with a very brief and temporary consideration of adverse effects.

This ⬆️ is the kind of in-depth analysis our national broadcaster should be doing, in the public interest. Not just parroting vaccine manufacturer talking points.

But when you point this out, you get accused of being a conspiracy theorist, and the BBC sets the spook-y Marianna Spring on you. 🙄🕵️‍♀️

[Liz Churchill @liz_churchill10]

In Britain…calling a lesbian a lesbian…singing a hymn in public…and posting on social media…will get you cuffed faster than a grooming gang gets investigated…

[John Olooney @OlooneyJohn]

@DrAseemMalhotra Only a revolution will save the british people and everyone else.
Andy isn’t the solution, he is the next puppet tasked ushering in globalist total control.
There is no democracy, but surely you know this by now

[Sharron Davies HoL MBE @sharrond62]

No one wants to harm Parkrun @parkrunUK it is a fabulous event. I’m spent my life trying to get people more active. That will carry on. My point is a simply one of fairness & equality. 28 women’s records are held by men, over 200 1st places in the women’s category have gone to men. More every weekend. It’s demoralising for those women wanting those places & records. This only goes one way. Women just want their own course records & places based on the reality of biological sex, which matters in physical activity. There are ways that extra categories can be added. So records & places remain, which is what the vast majority want to happen, which proves there is a competitive element to Parkrun as it stands. Hence a 30k petition to bring them back. Everyone runs together dresses as makes them happy. Non of that changes but simply enable a fair female category for females please?

[Dr. Matthew M. Wielicki @MatthewWielicki]

Much of the climate crisis is pure psychological manipulation.

[Gavin Maxwell Policy & Regulatory Advisor @Coolfin6]

Normal Kerosene Aviation Fuel condenses to water vapour & will disappear in the cool air in 1 to 4 minutes.

Anything else is planned chemical poisoning of our skies.

Flight plans must be recorded by the Civil Aviation authority & Airspace authorities.

Time to mount a legal challenge & force discovery & disclosure of this madness.

@GreatBritishPAC
@RestoreBritain
@ABridgen

[Indubitably @green_but_keen]

@Keir_Starmer You're so embarrassing. You sent our only ship (or do we have 2 now?) after an oil tanker and declare it as a blow to a world superpower.
You traitors have destroyed our credibility on the world stage - no one is afraid of us, let alone Russia.
Embarrassing.

[Paul 🇬🇧🇺🇸🇮🇱 @BasedMillwaII]

@Keir_Starmer So you can intercept an oil tanker but not a rubber dinghy, gaslighting c::t

[Robin Monotti @robinmonotti]

@Keir_Starmer This stupid act puts the country in grave danger and 12m out the Channel is international waters so this act of piracy against a civilian ship is a reckless violation of maritime law and international law. Time to step down before you get us all killed.

[Wide Awake Media @wideawake_media]

Former UK PM Lizz Truss argues that mass immigration is being weaponised as a means of deliberately undermining the nation state, as part of a broader agenda to destroy Western civilisation.

"We're seeing left-wing politicians wanting to encourage immigration to essentially undermine the basis of our society and undermine the basis of Western civilisation."

"They want to undermine the family. They want to undermine the nation state."

"And people in Britain are saying 'we've had enough of this'... And the reaction by Keir Starmer is to arrest those people and put them in jail."

[Alan @A1an_M]

Hello @SoilAssociation
Why is folic acid permitted in flour labelled Organic?
It's synthetic, anyone who isn't or won't be pregnant doesn't need it, and it can be harmful to people with certain MTHFR gene mutations (and probably other people too).
Can you tell the government to sod off, and change your rules please?

[Neil Oliver @thecoastguy]

Funny not funny.

[RosieM @RosieM1276203]

Wendy Daniel exposes the truth behind the polio hoax in 3 minutes.

[Shone 🌸 @sheonawatson]

@ABridgen https://t.co/G15ycoFvYD
Andrew you need to listen to David A Hughes who has done some extensive research on this case

[Nicolas Hulscher, MPH @NicHulscher]

STUDY FINDS SUNSCREEN USE LINKED TO DRAMATICALLY HIGHER RISK OF MULTIPLE SKIN CANCERS

A UK Biobank analysis of 470,000+ people found sunscreen users faced significantly higher risk of:

- MELANOMA: +292%
- BASAL CELL CARCINOMA: +140%
- SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA: +126%

This is what happens when you slather rapidly absorbed hormone disrupting chemicals all over your body while blocking vitamin D — one of the body’s key defenses against cancer.

These dramatic cancer signals remained even after accounting for major skin cancer risk factors: age, sex, skin type, tanning ability, sunburn history, sunlamp use, and time spent outdoors.

[Liz Kershaw @LizKershawDJ]

Well #Newsnight reached an all time low tonight. No attempt at balance at all. 3 smug politicians in the studio all trotting out tropes about Trump, @Nigel_Farage and @elonmusk and of course blaming "The Far Right" for people's anger. Not the refugee from Sudan.... for whom there seemed to be some sympathy! What contempt they, and @BBCNews, have for the British people.

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

Here we go !
I was told by a US Special forces colonel 4 years ago that 5G could be pulsed at a frequency to cause bleeding from all orifices of the human body - simulating symptoms of the Ebola/ Marburg virus.
Look at what is being prepared for now !

[Debi Evans @DebiEvansMatron]

Trouble is @ShabanaMahmood WE DON’T BELIEVE YOU

So be my guest refrain from apologising from anything we see right through it

#DigitalID #Surveillance 🙄 we see it

[Machiavelli @MachiavelliBus1]

Sturgeon and Murrell, had to ensure Salmond never returned to office, at any cost. They were advised that they would lose in court, but proceeded anyway, with the Moorov doctrine strategy, known in Scotland as throw enough shite and hope some of it sticks. They went to extraordinary lengths to damage Salmond, not for any other reason than to keep him out. The alphabetties, pawns in the game. Sturgeon didn't give a fuck about them. What else is there to uncover ?

[Sandi Adams @sandiadams2030]

This is happening all over the world. It’s been a long term plan. “Limits to Growth’ 1972 -commissioned by the Club of Rome.The meme was set. Too many people , not enough resources.
Control of the food supply.