@greenlightbabe@antifakommunist@frommontenegro Its the Ukrainian army using hospitals as human shields by treating the soldiers inside them. (Israel & EU justification for striking hospitals in Gaza)
Also they have the right to use a nuke and wipe out all of Kiev to force a surrender. (US justification for nuking Japan)
@ineffectivity@Blueeyedsultan MENA liberalism/feminism combine the worst elements of the far right and the far left in the west, preachy woke 1.0 and at the same time advocating for more western supremacy and imperialism.
@greenlightbabe@antifakommunist@frommontenegro Russia hasn't committed any crimes, if anything the fact that Putin hasn't rightfully dropped a nuke and wiped out all of Kiev shows how humane Russians are, after all the west justifies the usage of nukes to force their enemies to surrender unconditionally like the US did.
@DaikonCD@AbdulHaleem_26@apostateofallah Great so God didn't die on the cross and that was a human sacrifice, since human sacrifice is cursed by Yahweh it means that Christianity is false.
You can't have your cake and eat it.
@grok@Isaiah53John118@SalafiyyahNelly@InspiringPhilos Wait if it was only the human nature that was sacrificed then :
1. No God died on the cross.
2. It was a human sacrifice.
And since human sacrifice is cursed by Yahweh, therefore Christianity is false.
@futureman00@Christian_Vro@akhi__ex GL in the debate said Moses is a Jew and a Christian, apparently only Avery is allowed to attribute both to a man.
GL is just the most bad faith professional intentional misunderstander who's only goal in debates is to clip farm, look for gotchas and not engage with substance.
@olubee1999@Kryptotajeer Why do GL fangirls never respond with substance ?
What exactly we don't understand here ?
Jesus said he doesn't know, Hashim said he knows but won't declare, how is that analogous in any way ?
Are you guys as stupid as your low iq disciples ?
@Redd3639@Deenresponds That doesn't address the problem at hand, Christianity started out as a failed messianic movement and then later reinterpreted the purpose of the messiah from a king savior to a human sacrifice
btw this isn't even a Muslim argument, most NT critical scholars use this argument
@Redd3639@Deenresponds If both the OT & Jesus in 3 years were preaching that the messiah sole purpose is death and resurrection, then they had to be apes not just "imperfect".
Or the more plausible position is that it's an ad-hoc to explain why none of them had this belief when jesus was alive.
@grok@billionapostate@korrathetaymi@grok Does Matthew 2:23 use wordplay linking Jesus to Isaiah 11:1 (according to Christian apologists) ? if Yes, then why can't Muslims also apply wordplay in their interpretation ?
@md_jatta@mohammed_hijab You realize that this is literally the position of 100% of Muslims ? They are agnostic about what the Jews and the Christians say or have but believe in what was revealed to their prophets ?
Where exactly here is the counter argument from you of GL to Hijab's point ?
@remigrado@King_Naro9@GodLogic_GL Except that would make god dependent on his creation to ground his nature which is incoherent.
How can the temporal creation CAUSE a change in nature of an eternal being ?
You cannot be begotten (caused according to GL) except actively in time, or else words have no meaning.
@remigrado@King_Naro9@GodLogic_GL "Jesus caused the fatherhood of the father" This is like saying humans caused the creator-ness of god, which is a laughable argument.
But that's not even related to what GL said, he said the son was entirely perpetually caused into existence (begotten eternally) by the father.