إبن محمد الحنبلي

Following ≠ Endorsement

[SİYAH SANCAK @siyahsancakx]

🔴 Gazzeli bir çocuk:

"Yemin ederim korkuyorum, yemin ederim."

"Nefes bile alamıyorum.Gitmek istiyorum!"

[إبن محمد الحنبلي @shezislam]

If anyone has more statements from the S͟hayk͟h on this issue, share below إن شاء الله

[Shahmīr @shahmir69420]

Shaykh Ṣāliḥ al-Bulayhī regarding man-made laws

“Thus ruling by man made laws that contradict the Islamic Sharīʿah is oppression and injustice, ilḥād and heresy, corruption and ẓulm against the servants.

And this calamity is immense, in most ʾIslāmic countries, judgment is made according to man-made laws that contradict the Islamic Sharīʿah. Wa lā ḥawla wa lā quwwata illā billāh.”

[Al-Salsabīl fī Maʿrifat al-Dalīl, 3/366]

Note: ʿAllāmah Ṣāliḥ al-Bulayhī (raḥimahuḷḷāh) was among the teachers of Shaykh Ṣāliḥ al-Fawzān.

[Shahmīr @shahmir69420]

Shaykh Ṣāliḥ al-Bulayhī regarding man-made laws

“Thus ruling by man made laws that contradict the Islamic Sharīʿah is oppression and injustice, ilḥād and heresy, corruption and ẓulm against the servants.

And this calamity is immense, in most ʾIslāmic countries, judgment is made according to man-made laws that contradict the Islamic Sharīʿah. Wa lā ḥawla wa lā quwwata illā billāh.”

[Al-Salsabīl fī Maʿrifat al-Dalīl, 3/366]

Note: ʿAllāmah Ṣāliḥ al-Bulayhī (raḥimahuḷḷāh) was among the teachers of Shaykh Ṣāliḥ al-Fawzān.

[إبن محمد الحنبلي @shezislam]

@LuqmanHussain22 You criticised al-Turayfi extensively for holding the belief of this being bid’ah, yet here’s:

Sh ʿAbd al Latif
Sh Bakr ʾAbū Zayd
Sh Rajihi attributing it to ʾIbn Taymiyyah

Doing the same. Sh ʾIbn al ʿUthaymīn held the view too, Sh ʿAbd al Rahman al Barrāk did too.

Will you say the same regarding them? Or has your principles changed all of a sudden.

[إبن محمد الحنبلي @shezislam]

I will say, something interesting I’ve seen the last few years is the contrast between Muslims and Jewish Zionists in a particular issue.

Usually when Israel is criticised for its actions, Zionists do not disassociate themselves from Israel for what it does, rather they say and claim anyone who criticises Israel has criticised them and are antisemitic. Essentially attributing themselves to the acts of Israel despite the fact no one singles them out. Yet the media will never slate them for this direct support they have.

(Example: See Attached Image)

Whereas Muslims typically do disassociate from such people when people act in contradiction to the Sharīʿah who do things with the claim that it is aligned with Sharīʿah. Yet the media will still slate them for this.

The media loves to correlate the acts of some muslims that may contradict the Sharīʿah in some form, as being the epitome of the Sharīʿah and what Islām is (they hate the Sharīʿah anyways). Whereas when it comes to the “Holy War” by the current Zionist Regime and Israel in its essence, very daringly do they even use the term “Zionist”, never mind “Jewish”. As opposed to their favourite word: “Islamists”.

The consequence from it all, has led to an increase in attacks targeted towards muslims in the West. However, this shouldn’t really be much surprising. Millions of muslims slaughtered in the Middle East, Central Asia and South Asia and North Africa the last century, and you thought you being in Europe or America makes you any different to our brothers and sisters in the eyes of the people who slaughtered them?

As much as people (and I’ve probably made a comment similar to this in the past) push the notion that “there’s an increase in hatred towards Islām”. This really isn’t true, it’s not an increase in anything. The enmity was there, established 1,400 Years Ago :

[ 2:120 ] — “Never will the Jews or Christians be pleased with you, until you follow their faith. Say, “Allah’s guidance is the only ˹true˺ guidance.” And if you were to follow their desires after ˹all˺ the knowledge that has come to you, there would be none to protect or help you against Allah”

[ 5:51 ] — “O believers! Take neither Jews nor Christians as guardians—they are guardians of each other. Whoever does so will be counted as one of them. Surely Allah does not guide the wrongdoing people”

What we’re seeing now isn’t an “increase in hatred”, the hatred was always there, their hatred towards Tawḥīd and their enmity towards the truth always existed. What you see now is just the manifestation of their hatred, because they’re capable of carrying out their plots due to the weakness found in the Ummah.

The Messenger of Allah ﷺ said : “Soon the nations will be summoned to you just like one is invited to a feast.”

It was said : “Will we be few in that day?”

The Prophet said : “No, rather you will be many in that day, but you will be scum like such flowing down a torrent. Allah will remove your esteem from the chests of your enemies, and Allah will insert feebleness in your own hearts.”

It was said : “O Messenger of Allah, what is this feebleness?”

The Prophet said : “Love for the worldly life and hatred of death.”

Sunan Abī Dāwūd 4297

[إبن محمد الحنبلي @shezislam]

I will say, something interesting I’ve seen the last few years is the contrast between Muslims and Jewish Zionists in a particular issue.

Usually when Israel is criticised for its actions, Zionists do not disassociate themselves from Israel for what it does, rather they say and claim anyone who criticises Israel has criticised them and are antisemitic. Essentially attributing themselves to the acts of Israel despite the fact no one singles them out. Yet the media will never slate them for this direct support they have.

(Example: See Attached Image)

Whereas Muslims typically do disassociate from such people when people act in contradiction to the Sharīʿah who do things with the claim that it is aligned with Sharīʿah. Yet the media will still slate them for this.

The media loves to correlate the acts of some muslims that may contradict the Sharīʿah in some form, as being the epitome of the Sharīʿah and what Islām is (they hate the Sharīʿah anyways). Whereas when it comes to the “Holy War” by the current Zionist Regime and Israel in its essence, very daringly do they even use the term “Zionist”, never mind “Jewish”. As opposed to their favourite word: “Islamists”.

The consequence from it all, has led to an increase in attacks targeted towards muslims in the West. However, this shouldn’t really be much surprising. Millions of muslims slaughtered in the Middle East, Central Asia and South Asia and North Africa the last century, and you thought you being in Europe or America makes you any different to our brothers and sisters in the eyes of the people who slaughtered them?

As much as people (and I’ve probably made a comment similar to this in the past) push the notion that “there’s an increase in hatred towards Islām”. This really isn’t true, it’s not an increase in anything. The enmity was there, established 1,400 Years Ago :

[ 2:120 ] — “Never will the Jews or Christians be pleased with you, until you follow their faith. Say, “Allah’s guidance is the only ˹true˺ guidance.” And if you were to follow their desires after ˹all˺ the knowledge that has come to you, there would be none to protect or help you against Allah”

[ 5:51 ] — “O believers! Take neither Jews nor Christians as guardians—they are guardians of each other. Whoever does so will be counted as one of them. Surely Allah does not guide the wrongdoing people”

What we’re seeing now isn’t an “increase in hatred”, the hatred was always there, their hatred towards Tawḥīd and their enmity towards the truth always existed. What you see now is just the manifestation of their hatred, because they’re capable of carrying out their plots due to the weakness found in the Ummah.

The Messenger of Allah ﷺ said : “Soon the nations will be summoned to you just like one is invited to a feast.”

It was said : “Will we be few in that day?”

The Prophet said : “No, rather you will be many in that day, but you will be scum like such flowing down a torrent. Allah will remove your esteem from the chests of your enemies, and Allah will insert feebleness in your own hearts.”

It was said : “O Messenger of Allah, what is this feebleness?”

The Prophet said : “Love for the worldly life and hatred of death.”

Sunan Abī Dāwūd 4297

[ابن احمد @IbnAhmad1_]

Shaykh Abī al-ʿAlā ar-Rāshid said regarding ruling by other than Allah:

The confusion of this grave issue in the minds of many of those who have written about it, and the intensification of the debate: Is ruling by other than what Allah has revealed, and setting aside the Sharīʿah from the affairs of life, among the matters that constitute kufr, or not?

Some have even gone so far as to describe those who consider judging by man-made laws in the affairs of life to be among the nullifiers, as being from the Khawārij. They claimed that judging by man-made laws, in all its forms, is kufr al-aṣghar (minor kufr), and that the one who rules by other than the Sharīʿah does not commit kufr unless he is a denier or mustaḥill (one who deems it lawful).

The people of knowledge, praise be to Allah, have refuted this group and clarified the falsehood of their statements.

Clarifying that ruling by what Allah has revealed is connected to Tawḥīd al-Ulūhiyyah, and that this issue is connected to Tawḥīd of obedience and following.

Whoever judges by the Sharīʿah has obeyed Allah, and whoever sets aside the Sharīʿah has committed shirk with Allah. Thus, shirk in His judgment is like shirk in His worship, exactly the same.

[Ḍawābiṭ at-Takfīr al-Muʿayyan ʿinda Shaykh al-Islām Ibn Taymiyyah wa Ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhāb – Shaykh Abī al-ʿAlā ar-Rāshid p.216]

Shaykh al-Fawzān has praised the shaykh many time and said whoever attacks his work, this in particular, is a Murjiʾ, as happened to one of the “scholars” that has been made into Al-Allamah when he attacked this work.

[DOAM @doamuslims]

A Palestinian woman who was six months pregnant lost her unborn child after Israeli forces delayed the ambulance transporting her at a military checkpoint near Nablus in the occupied West Bank.

The ambulance was held for more than 30 minutes as the woman, who was suffering from severe bleeding, was searched despite her critical condition.

Ambulance staff also said Israeli soldiers ordered the vehicle's engine to be switched off, disabling its onboard medical equipment.

The woman was eventually taken to hospital, where doctors saved her life but were unable to save that of her unborn child.

[Fatima @hikmaquine]

Ibn Taymiyyah (رحمه الله) said:

أهل السعادة هم أهل التوحيد

“The people of happiness and contentment are the people of tawhid (monotheism).”

📚: Majmū‘ al-Fatāwā (9/29)

[إبن محمد الحنبلي @shezislam]

Muḥammad ibn al-Ḥusayn al-Ājurrī said :

The strangest of strangers in our time is the one who adheres to the Sunnah and remains patient with it, who avoids innovations and is patient in abstaining from them, who follows the path of the early Imams of the Muslims, who understands the times he lives in and the extent of its corruption and the corruption of its people, and who focuses on reforming his own condition by guarding his limbs, avoiding involvement in what does not concern him, and working on mending his own faults. His pursuit of this world is limited to what is necessary for his sustenance, avoiding excess that may lead him astray, and he interacts with the people of his time without compromising his principles, and he is patient with that. Such a one is a stranger. Few from amongst his family or brethren who find comfort and closeness with him — yet that does not harm [or bother] him.

قال محمد بن الحسين رحمه الله : الغرباء في وقتنا هذا من أخذ بالسنة وصبر عليها وحذر البدع وصبر عنها ، واتبع آثار من سلف من أئمة المسلمين وعرف زمانه وشدة فساده وفساد أهله فاستغنى بإصلاح شأن نفسه من حفظ جوارحه وترك الخوض فيما لا يعنيه وعمل في إصلاح كسرته وكان طلبه من الدنيا مافيه كفايته في ترك الفضل الذي يطغيه ، ودارى أهل زمانه ولم يداهنهم وصبر على ذلك فهذا غريب ، من يأنس إليه من العشيرة والاخوان قليل ولا يضره ذلك.

كتاب الغرباء للآجري (63)

——

Nice description from Imām al-Ājurrī on the Strangers and their characteristics, something which is rare in today’s time. May we be amongst them.

[إبن محمد الحنبلي @shezislam]

Ibn Qudāmah رحمه الله stated:

It is undesirable to breastfeed a child with the breastmilk of a stupid woman, so that the child does not become like her in stupidity.

It is said : Breastfeeding changes personalities.

ويكره الارتضاع بلبن الحمقاء، كيلا يشبهها الولد في الحمق، فإنه يقال: إن الرضاع يغير الطباع

ابن قدامة المقدسي، المغني (8/194)

——

Be mindful of who you marry, often the case it isn’t how you raise your child that matters as much, it’s the mother of the child herself and who she is and how she carries herself

[إبن محمد الحنبلي @shezislam]

Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhāb said :

Some people of religion denounce an evil, while being correct in doing so, but they err in harshly exaggerating the matter to the point that it leads to division among brothers.

قال محمد بن عبد الوهاب : أن بعض أهل الدين ينكر منكراً، وهو مصيب، لكن يخطئ في تغليظ الأمر، إلى شيء يوجب الفرقة بين الإخوان

كتاب الدرر السنية في الأجوبة النجدية (9/150)

——

Certain groups of people on social media need to hear this, often the case their approach to a situation worsens the situation at hand. All purely because of ego.

[إبن محمد الحنبلي @shezislam]

Ibn Qudāmah رحمه الله stated:

It is undesirable to breastfeed a child with the breastmilk of a stupid woman, so that the child does not become like her in stupidity.

It is said : Breastfeeding changes personalities.

ويكره الارتضاع بلبن الحمقاء، كيلا يشبهها الولد في الحمق، فإنه يقال: إن الرضاع يغير الطباع

ابن قدامة المقدسي، المغني (8/194)

——

Be mindful of who you marry, often the case it isn’t how you raise your child that matters as much, it’s the mother of the child herself and who she is and how she carries herself

[إبن محمد الحنبلي @shezislam]

Isḥāq ibn Aḥmad al-ʿUlaythī said :

Our companions have always openly spoken the plain truth at all times, even if they were to be struck by swords.

They do not fear the blame of any blamer for the sake of Allāh , nor are they bothered by the ugliness of those who reproach, nor by the lies of liars.

They possess from a sweet and pleasing reputation, and their abandonment of the worldly life and their turning away from it in preoccupation with the Hereafter is a well-known fact.

قال إسحاق بن أحمد العلثي : وما زال أصحابنا يجهرون بصريح الحق في كل وقت ، ولو ضُربوا بالسيوف ، لا يخافون في الله لومة لائم ، ولا يبالون بشناعة مشنع ، ولا كذب كاذب ، ولهم من الاسم العذب الهني ، وتركهم الدنيا وإعراضهم عنها اشتغالاً بالآخرة : ما هو معلوم معروف

ذيل طبقات الحنابلة (2/210)

——

This is a trait we see less of in today’s time, unfortunately most people do fear the blame of the critic, they abandon the truth at the threat of the sword and often the case they distort the truth out of fear of the sword even confronting them.

[إبن محمد الحنبلي @shezislam]

Imām Aḥmad b. Ḥanbal said :

I have seen that the people of desires, innovations, and opposition have invented disgraceful and ugly names with which they label Ahl al-Sunnah. Their intent behind this is to discredit them, malign them, attack them, and belittle them in the eyes of the foolish and the ignorant.

قال الإمام أحمد : وقد رأيت لأهل الأهواء والبدع والخلاف أسماء شنعة قبيحة يسمون بها أهل السنة يريدون بذلك عيبهم والطعن عليهم، والوقيعة فيهم، والإزراء بهم عند السفهاء والجهال

الجامع لعلوم الإمام أحمد (4/205)

——

This is a trait you will find especially on social media where people hide behind screens, and all they have is bad manners.

[إبن محمد الحنبلي @shezislam]

𝐃𝐞𝐟𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐋𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐌𝐮𝐬𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬 𝐚𝐥𝐨𝐧𝐠𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐈𝐧𝐧𝐨𝐯𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐬

Muḥammad ibn al-Ḥasan al-Shaybānī [d. 189 AH] in Al-Aṣl :

I asked : What is your opinion if a group of the Khawārij were to overtake one of the cities of the Muslims and commit therein injustice; thereafter some of the mushrikūn attacked them, taking their offspring as captives and bringing them into Dār al-Ḥarb (enemy territory). Should the Muslims who are in the Dār al-Ḥarb with a covenant of security, should they break their covenant and fight to rescue those (captive) offspring?

He [al-Shaybānī] said : Yes.

I asked : Likewise if there is in that city some Muslims (other than the Khawārij), and Ahl al-Ḥarb (people of war) attacked them - should the Muslims fight alongside the Khawārij to defend the Muslim lands, and their sanctities?

He [al-Shaybānī] said : Yes, they have no option but to do so.

• | Kitāb al-Aṣl (7/492)