..

new acc

[.. @shhcaia]

@AidooFlu @iszambe @cassioolivveira He literally said just a few years ago on Pier Morgan how embarrassed it makes him and mentions sitting with Georgina and hearing his children come downstairs and having to change the channel so they don’t hear their father being called a rapist, ofc he cares.

[.. @shhcaia]

@scekei @AidooFlu @iszambe @cassioolivveira Also, I said leaks generally and didn't specify. You selectively cropped out the next part where he said the core reason an edit can't be validated or refuted is bc nobody from Ronaldo's team will engage which is necessary. Ronaldo never even dared to say what these “edits” were.

[.. @shhcaia]

@scekei @AidooFlu @iszambe @cassioolivveira There is nothing omitted, u are just trying to change the subject bc u were wrong. You are posting something independent from years after the trial, obviously he couldn't personally authenticate it. yet u think it overrides the judge saying it was real attorney/client privilege..

[.. @shhcaia]

@AidooFlu @iszambe @cassioolivveira More of a gigantic loss to the clients commercial image than ppl still calling him a rapist 17 years later bc a questionnaire exists where he admits it?

[.. @shhcaia]

@AidooFlu @iszambe @cassioolivveira Possibly a translation error but it does feel misconstruing to take documents where he repeatedly acknowledged she said no and stop and emphasise possible editing, when it wasn’t the core argument and couldn’t be substantiated when asked to elaborate or prove it

[.. @shhcaia]

@scekei @AidooFlu @iszambe @cassioolivveira They were genuine, acknowledged leaks of Ronaldo and his team. “The court found that defendant Cristiano Ronaldo had not waived privilege and struck them”and “Stovall's repeated use of stolen, privileged documents to prosecute this case has every indication of bad-faith conduct."

[.. @shhcaia]

@AidooFlu @iszambe @cassioolivveira U are misrepresenting what happened. The case was dismissed bc of bad-faith use of stolen, privileged attorney-client documents between Ronaldo and his legal team. It wasn’t bc they were edited and the woman’s team asked him to say what was edited and prove it, he couldn’t.

[.. @shhcaia]

@Nana_owusuu @KofiAppiah18541 @Yawkonadu_Tv No, u can’t be proven innocent. His guilt wasn’t proven beyond reasonable doubt bc he was a predator who lured women into a controlled environment which made gathering that beyond reasonable doubt evidence next to impossible. If he is ur image of innocence then u look creepy.

[.. @shhcaia]

@iEdu2rdo @ZsForZedd @M0ATH The irony of saying this bc ur mad a western country isn’t accommodating ur bigoted feelings. Other than the flags, fifa has directly funded lgbt initiatives like the IGLFA, so if it’s such an issue don’t participate at all in protest. I promise u won’t be missed

[.. @shhcaia]

@KofiAppiah18541 @Yawkonadu_Tv He needed a retrial bc they couldn’t agree on his innocence and even his own defence said his behaviour was irresponsible given he slept with hundreds of isolated women after taking their phones and getting them heavily drunk

[.. @shhcaia]

@Femi_MORE @SPIRITEDG7 @Zeeberto666 @DanFeddon @F365 no you are just proving his point by equating the possibility of being the descendant of colonisers, to the possibility of being a serial rapist

[.. @shhcaia]

@whisardly @LfcNuel yeah it’s made up for engagement 😂

[.. @shhcaia]

@TipsterSure @gunners4231 @AugustusClausus @1aurarose @jadenstruth so they are always either innocent or forgiven? what a poor way to say that you will always defend it

[.. @shhcaia]

@ragnar_xps @lord_temporal @Shirofoxx @TylerDeLuca You are insanely delusional to think you know more than professionals, especially considering you have proven you don’t even have a superficial knowledge of the subject and obviously have no experience given you are from an entirely different continent

[.. @shhcaia]

@ragnar_xps @lord_temporal @Shirofoxx @TylerDeLuca Unlike them, an investigating judge found that the victim’s core allegation has remained substantially consistent. French prosecutors and investigating judges concluded there is sufficient evidence to justify a trial, this rarely happens with these type of allegations.

[.. @shhcaia]

@ragnar_xps @lord_temporal @Shirofoxx @TylerDeLuca These are different legal systems😂 Again, in France only a tiny minority can go to trial and of that 80-90% are found guilty. Whereas in England it’s closer to 50/50. It is very unlikely he will be found not guilty. Also, guilt not proven beyond reasonable doubt ≠ proven false

[.. @shhcaia]

@ragnar_xps @lord_temporal @Shirofoxx @TylerDeLuca If that is one of the dumbest takes you have heard then you are as uneducated as you sound. Why did you stop the screenshot there? Keep on reading “I’m going home, it’s very serious" and "I beg you, hurry up, it’s very serious, he’s raping me, my mother's life", “I can’t leave”

[.. @shhcaia]

@ragnar_xps @lord_temporal @Shirofoxx @TylerDeLuca Unlike Hakimi and Mbappe, she never lied. They contradicted each other and needed to backtrack their claims. To be criminally prosecuted, it is never just word against word, this is why 94% of rape complaints in France were dismissed without a trial, whereas Hakimi’s wasn’t.

[.. @shhcaia]

@ragnar_xps @lord_temporal @Shirofoxx @TylerDeLuca Dna testing is traumatic so it’s not surprising. The messages were labeled dark humour, why would she write her malicious intentions and then shift to panic whilst accusing Hakimi and asking to be picked up. If u say her jokes are genuine why not the subsequent texts