shiya

a'tin | mahalima

KENTIN KENTIN
KENTIN KENTIN
KENTIN hatdogers

[shiya @shiyaxy]

patuloy kang mamahalin

[sea ❄️ೀ˚☾𔓎 @naseken_]

everything in time, my song! imissyou.

#MAHALIMA #PABLO

[AGGY 🌸🎡 WALO @InMyBINIEra]

Kaya alam niyo bakit napaka out-of-touch ng mga anak ng politiko?

International Schools doesn’t follow the Philippine/National curriculum that we normally follow. They use a more globally known system. It’s usually meant for families na palipat lipat ng bansa para madali mag-adjust mga anak nila education system.

Kaya mga nepo babies walang alam history and politics sa Pilipinas. Dapat sa public school nilalagay yang mga yan ehh para ramdam nila yung panloloko ng corrupt nilang pamilya

[@pauloinmanila and 99 others @pauloMDtweets]

"WHY ARE YOU DOING THIS? YOU ARE FOOLING THE PEOPLE."

People from San Miguel Corp and DENR are doing "Earth Balling" (daw) pero yung katabing puno na na earth-ball nakahiga nalang.

Question ko, bakit sa gabi nila ginagawa yan? Para hindi makita ng taong bayan? The construction of SALEX will destroy a lot of historical and heritage structures in Manila City plus mawawalan pa ng mga puno 🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳

©️ Tay Mesario (fb)

[Ceevs @cvmalaya]

Ngek

[KAIA Official @KAIAOfficialPH]

🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽

#kaia #kaiaishere

[Alex Abaño @sheergrace]

address ni Loren ang pinuntahan nyo, saang banda yung nagkamali kayo?

[Jesus Falcis 🇵🇭 @jesusfalcis]

⚠️ You know the first test to determine who is the legitimate Senate Majority?

Check who will facilitate the transfer of custody of Curlee Discaya from Senate custody to Bulacan RTC.

Who will the Lower Court recognize?

Feeling ko hindi si APC. 😂

👊

[Ayaw Sa Adik Pero @AyawSaAdikPero]

MARKUBETA BIGLANG ESKAPO!

Galing galing gumawa ng script tapos yung pinangalanan nyo sa Fake hearing nyo ng sumugod sa Senado bigla kang eskapo ano yun.

Tapang-tapangan pero pag nandyan na yung pinangalanan biglang alis.

#CongAlvarez #Marcoleta #SenatePH #fyp #cayetano

[Bilyonaryo News Channel @bncdotph]

WATCH: Dianne Loyola, one of the remaining 5 families who are still active in missing sabungero hearings, showed money allegedly given to her and others in exchange of silence regarding the case.

They went to DOJ on Friday to submit more copies of their obstruction of justice complaint against Atty. Caroline Cruz, lawyer of Atong Ang, and many others. | via Ched Gatchalian, https://t.co/9R0Mcay5im

[Win Gatchalian @WinGatchalian74]

Ang sesyon noong Hunyo 3, 2026 ay lehitimo at naaayon sa batas — IBP

Ang Avelino v. Cuenco ruling ay nagsasabi ng isang simpleng bagay: ang Konstitusyon ay hindi dapat gamitin para pigilan ang Senado sa paggawa ng tungkulin nito.

May dalawang senador na hindi makadalo sa mga gawain ng kapulungan sa kasalukuyan, kaya 22 na lamang ang maituturing na available na miyembro — at ang 12 sa kanila ay bumubuo ng mayorya.

Mahalagang tandaan na ang quorum ay batay sa bilang ng mga senador na maaaring lumahok. Sa kasong ito, malinaw na natugunan ang kinakailangang quorum.

[NewsWatch Plus PH @newswatchplusph]

SENATE CHAOS 'BAD NEWS' FOR DUTERTE’S ICC CASE'

WATCH: Former International Criminal Court judge Raul Pangalangan says the reported escape of Senator Bato dela Rosa, allegedly facilitated by his Senate colleagues could hurt former President Rodrigo Duterte’s request for interim release.

In an exclusive interview on The Newsmaker, Pangalangan said the Senate events may be used to argue that Duterte still has the power to influence officials and interfere with proceedings - grounds that could lead to the denial of his request. | @TristanNodalo

[Adrei Aldovino 🇵🇭 @Drethegrater]

Sa mga nagsasabi na troll o ginagamit lang ng politiko ito:

Mark was my classmate in Senior High School. He’s a bright, independent-minded person who understands Philippine politics well. Hindi yan magpapagamit sa kahit sinong politiko.

[NewsWatch Plus PH @newswatchplusph]

IBP: JUNE 3 SENATE QUORUM IS VALID

UPDATE: The Integrated Bar of the Philippines says the Senate session on June 3, 2026, where a quorum of 12 senators was declared, was lawful and valid.

In a statement, the IBP, which is the official, mandatory national group for all lawyers admitted to practice law in the country, cited the Supreme Court ruling in the Avelino vs. Cuenco, saying senators who could not realistically be compelled to attend may be excluded from the quorum count.

The IBP said that with one senator detained on a non-bailable offense and another whose whereabouts were unknown, 12 senators constituted a majority of the 22 senators considered available, thereby forming a valid quorum. | @TristanNodalo

[Jojo Clemente @jclem3]

Bakit ganun? May mga pamgalan na hindi sinama? Bogus "hearing" na nga, bogus testimony pa.

[The Philippine Star @PhilippineStar]

‘THE SENATE SESSION OF JUNE 3, 2026 WAS LAWFUL AND VALID’

The Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) released an official statement on the legitimacy of the Senate quorum held on Wednesday, June 3, 2026.

IBP cited the Supreme Court decision on the landmark case of Avelino vs. Cuenco.

“In short, the Senate session of June 3, 2026 was lawful and valid following the Avelino doctrine because a quorum of 12 Senators was constituted. All acts, resolutions and decisions made by the Senate during its session of June 3, 2026 are presumed to be official acts of the Philippine Senate following the presumption of regularity in the discharge of official functions,” their statement read. (Facebook/IBP)

[Ꮆ Ꭵ Ꮛ @gesperas]

Cong. Pepito Alvarez:

“May kinalaman doon sa pinadala sa akin ni Mike Defensor…
Si Mike Defensor ang nagpadala sa akin ng impeachment complaint laban sa Pangulo at kung maaari raw ay i-endorso ko…

Eh NANG HINDI KO INENDORSO, BIGLA na lang AKO NAGKAPANGALAN dito.”

😂

🎥 bncphl youtube chanel

[Inquirer @inquirerdotnet]

‘THE SENATE SESSION OF JUNE 3, 2026 WAS LAWFUL AND VALID'

READ: The Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) issues a statement on what constitutes a legitimate quorum for the Senate to conduct official business following the June 3 Senate session, saying the 1949 Avelino v. Cuenco ruling is applicable.

“One senator cannot be compelled to attend the session because he is detained in relation to a non-bailable offense. While another senator cannot be found, as in fact, his whereabouts appear to be unknown since May 11, 2026,” it reads.

“As such, they were excluded from the count of the members used to determine quorum.” | 📷: IBP

[Ꮆ Ꭵ Ꮛ @gesperas]

Ipapaalala ko lang po ang sinabi ni Mayor Vico Sotto:

“Hindi lang sila basta naglalaglagan, gusto nila magulo ang kwento. Gusto nila lituhin tayo. Gusto nila na di na natin malalaman ang totoo.”

"These are people who are really capable of lying without batting an eyelash."
https://t.co/w2hoo9sV3L

[marv @mvn_dn]

@sotto_tito she was there up front when it happened too

[Quito 🌸📡|BINI Signals World Tour 2026 📡 @QuitoNitura]

I've already seen some legal analyses saying that Avelino v. Cuenco might be inapplicable to what happened in the Senate today, thus arguing that the reorganization was invalid. Some are saying that the mention on the basis for quorum in that case was mere obiter dictum. Some even say that that 1949 case could have been superseded by the 1987 Constitution already.

In my view, Avelino v. Cuenco is applicable.

What is clear in the case is that the Supreme Court held that it did not have jurisdiction to interfere in the manner by which the Senate selects its officers. This is a long settled principle in Constitutional Law. In that case, Senator Cuenco was designated as acting Senate President by the remaining senators. He was then recognized as such by then President Quirino. (The same is the case today.) The refusal by the Supreme Court to interfere is an example of the political question doctrine.

The 1987 Constitution, particularly Article VIII, Section 1, limited the applicability of the political question doctrine by expanding the certiorari jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, if any branch or instrumentality of government acts with grave abuse of discretion. In recent years, there has been a development towards the acceptability of looking into the wisdom of a particular action of government by the SC to see if there was grave abuse of discretion. (This was evident in the interpellation of Justice Amy Lazaro-Javier yesterday in the oral arguments on the Unprogrammed Appropriations Cases.)

By citing Avelino v. Cuenca, and the 5 May 2015 Senate precedent, SP Pro Tempore and acting Senate President @WinGatchalian74 demonstrated that there was wisdom and basis for the Senate's action of electing him and choosing other officers of the Senate. There was no grave abuse of discretion, so the SC will most likely not interfere with the Senate reorganization. Notably, Art. VI, Section 16(1), last sentence, allows the Senate to choose its own officials (with the exception of the Senate President) "as it may deem necessary."

THEREFORE,
1. The declaration that all position in the Senate, including SP, was vacant is valid.
2. The election of Win Gatchalian as SP Pro Tempore, including the election of the other officers of the Senate, is allowed under the Senate Rules, the 1987 Constitution, and Avelino v. Cuenco
3. The Supreme Court will most likely not interfere with the Senate reorganization.