shorey

information, opinion, praise, logical arguments & sometimes blunt truth.

I also seek to hold media & celebs to account.

my likes=support 65% + of a tweet

[shorey @shoreytime]

@annikasmethurst @hughriminton @TheRealPBarry @RobertOvadia @abcmelbourne @Raf_Epstein @PaulineHansonOz Hinch was jailed, Sam Newman was suspended, @PeterGreste was jailed, the Perth radio guy who asked Gillard about Tim lost job.
They were just 'doing their job' too. So was Pauline H.

So a Police raid looking through your drawers is pretty low on the scale of life interference

[shorey @shoreytime]

@Jerrybraden92 @TheRealSambora Congratilations Ava and Richie

[Sky News Australia @SkyNewsAust]

Victorian Opposition Leader Jess Wilson has unveiled a major plan to combat the state's crime crisis, vowing to reopen 40 police stations and hire 3,000 more officers - with half coming from overseas. https://t.co/nPHA8c9fYM

[Rand Paul @RandPaul]

Fauci's philosophy: punish people until they submit.
He lied to Congress, funded gain-of-function research, and covered it all up. I've referred him for criminal prosecution three times. Justice is long overdue.

[Sall Grover @salltweets]

**Giggle v Tickle**

Unfortunately, there are still no updates. We have been waiting for a decision for 7 months & just over 1 week. It is longer than the average case, which is a bit strange considering there is zero discovery to discover. It’s just… “do women still have rights or no?”

Everything about this has gone on as long as it possibly could. So, let’s look at the time line of the whole damn thing:

*ahem*

* December 2021 - Tickle filed the AHRC complaint.

* January 2022 - I received the AHRC complaint. It was a hell week. I was 14 weeks pregnant, in isolation with COVID, Giggle was under attack yet again from thousands of “gamer boys” wearing headsets & trying to access & leaving 1 star reviews claiming to be rejected black women (seriously). Business Insider ran a story about the app being racist (it wasn’t at all) & didn’t print my response/evidence. THEN I received the AHRC complaint. Looking back, I don’t know how I coped with that week.

* April 2022 - I officially said “no” to settling at the AHRC. To do so, I would have had to let Tickle onto the app, let all men who claim to be women onto the app, apologize, attend sex & gender education, pay him $20,000 & moderate content so men who claim to be women weren’t offended by anything women were saying. F—k no.

* June 2022 - Tickle filed in Federal Court.

* July 2022 - Tickle withdrew the case from Federal Court. It was a week before my daughter was born.

* August 2022 - Taking the whole situation as a win for standing my ground, we were moving forward with the app. It needed a lot of work & updates from 2.5 years of running. We didn’t have the budget to do the work while running it. We decided to take it offline & relaunch it on our own terms - finally! - a few months later, better than ever. Giggle 2.0.

* December 2022 - Tickle refiled in Federal Court before we could relaunch the app. I found out about it at 11am on NYE via an article in The Guardian. I hadn’t been served yet.
Because Tickle was refilling on the same AHRC complaint claim, he was technically “out of time”. There’s a 60 day time limit to file in court after AHRC complaints. He was now 6 months out of time, because he’d withdrawn. The court had to allow it through.

* April 2023 - First court hearing, arguing whether the case should go ahead.

* June 2023 - The Federal Court allows the case to go ahead. A year after he had withdrawn. Now, we were back to where we were in June 2022. An extra year had been added to the process. So when Tickle cries on the steps about how this has stolen time in his life, remember: he withdrew, he refilled. His actions added the extra time. I was ready to go in 2022.

* July 2023 - The AHRC applies to intervene as amicus curiae aka “friend of the court”. Specifically, it’s the sex discrimination commission applying to intervene. They have a right to be amicus, as the SDC is the custodian of the sex discrimination act. This case is entirely about the SDA.
A bit of irony: the sex discrimination commissioner applied to intervene to defend gender identity over sex in the sex discrimination act. I’m the one defending sex.

* April 2024 - Tickle v Giggle hearing in federal court over 3 days. Tickle sat with the SDC, not his legal team. The SDC argued that being a woman comes down to a thought in one’s mind. Tickle’s barrister called me “Ms Tickle” and him “he” many times during X-examination. She routinely had to correct herself. She tried to established that I had sold hundreds of thousands worth of novelty candles featuring a meme of Tickle on it. I had nothing to do with the candle. When she demanded I look at picture of the candle, I laughed at it for maybe 3 seconds. I apologized immediately. She yelled at me. It was completely bizarre. She asked if I thought it was unkind to not call him “Ms Tickle”. I said it was unkind to force someone to accept a man as a woman.

1/3

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

This is genius

A video was made in the style of Disney that explains Sharia Law

This makes Islam and Sharia Law easy to understand for everyone of all ages

[Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education @craigkellyAFEE]

The ABC shamelessly lied to every Australian about the deadly COVID jab!

The ABC's supposed job is to shield everyday Aussies from greedy, fraudulent Big Pharma pushing dangerous products.

Instead, they became Pfizer's lapdogs—pushing propaganda, burying inconvenient truths, and smearing anyone who dared question the experimental shots.

The ABC wasn't just complicit—they were in bed with Pfizer, marching in lockstep to sell the jab while censoring real science and real harm.

The ABC betrayed the public.

The ABC betrayed trust.

The ABC betrayed Australia.

The ABC has proven beyond doubt it's a biased propaganda machine with zero right to another cent of taxpayer money.

DEFUND THE ABC NOW!

Shut it down. Sell it off.

Let the woke elites pay for their own echo chamber. No more forced funding for liars who sold out Australians to Big Pharma.

[Gerard Rennick @RennickGBR]

“The government will introduce legislation which will shield intelligence officials and politicians giving evidence to the Bondi Royal Commission.

“This could include protecting intelligence officers, who may give evidence in camera, when they reveal information normally banned by security laws,” he said.

“It will also include protecting politicians should they be asked about deliberations of the National Security Committee of the Cabinet or other discussions.
“My understanding is the Royal Commissioner, Virginia Bell, has asked for these protections.”

•••••••••••••••••

I fail to see what information regarding the Bondi shooters is so sensitive that it can’t be disclosed.

The Australian public have a right to know why the Intelligence agencies failed to prevent the shootings at Bondi.

There needs to be much greater scrutiny of our intelligence agencies. They are extremely powerful and should be held to account like every other government department is.

They have a track record of avoiding scrutiny particularly around COVID and weapons of mass destruction.

People First is the only party who wants to hold these agencies to account.

Please support us at https://t.co/PeAaJW2pjF

[A Gene Robinson @AlBuffalo2nite]

So let’s slow this down for a second…

When someone declares they have “exposed a global far-right playbook,” what they are actually doing is framing disagreement as extremism instead of debating policy on facts. That is not analysis… it is narrative construction.

Labeling opposition as “global far-right” is a classic rhetorical shortcut. It removes the need to argue substance. It turns political disagreement into moral accusation. Once the label is applied, anything said afterward becomes easier to dismiss without examination.

Notice what happens next. Instead of discussing specific policies, outcomes, or measurable evidence, the language shifts toward emotional signaling and broad ideological branding. That tells you the goal is persuasion through framing, not persuasion through proof.

Real exposure would include:

Clear documentation.

Specific actions tied to verifiable outcomes.

Direct quotations placed in context.

Transparent sourcing.

Without that, the statement becomes performance politics… a headline designed to mobilize supporters rather than inform the public.

When debate turns into labeling, the conversation stops being about truth and becomes about control of perception.

And people are starting to recognize the difference.

#SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove

[shorey @shoreytime]

@Watch_Tower_Dow @megynkelly They would have credit card details but maybe their video gets wiped after 3 months ?

[shorey @shoreytime]

@LiveFreeOrDie2A @FroemelAndy @NickJFuentes ☺️

[shorey @shoreytime]

@FroemelAndy @NickJFuentes Maybe Megyn Kelly

[shorey @shoreytime]

@sgt_creamsoda @Sean_Sovereign @EddieTrunk Its not yheir best but worst is a big call. Their morse stuff and song last year with new guy didnt impress me much. They should got Vito Bratta or an 80s star. Or given Vai 3mil and said do an album an a tour with us please. That would give DP a boost and revitalize

[shorey @shoreytime]

@Jones3d @Sean_Sovereign @EddieTrunk The Kiss record sounds sped up to 1.2x Aces solo seems fast and kinda nuanced

[shorey @shoreytime]

@AreTwo @thecynthia @Sean_Sovereign @EddieTrunk Did they have better riffs with the first huitarist ? I feel riffs on bog Leppard albums are lacking same as riffs on zaerosmith late 80s, they noth become pop rick which is ok but the riffs were MIA . They both became more a singing, sing a long hamony layers group .

[Lara Logan @laralogan]

Well this is HUGE

[Megyn Kelly @megynkelly]

How DARE they? This is COMPLETELY UNACCEPTABLE.

[shorey @shoreytime]

@WhizBuckleyNFH @megynkelly Well said. They know it would end badly

[Rosita Díaz @RositaDaz48]

“LINDA REYNOLDS ISN’T STAYING SILENT ANY LONGER.” The Former Defence Minister Has Ignited A Legal Firestorm — One Powerful Enough To Shake Canberra To Its Core. In A Stunning Escalation, Linda Reynolds Has Announced She Is Taking The Commonwealth AND HWL Ebsworth To Court Over The $2.4 Million Higgins Settlement, A Move Insiders Are Calling “A Political Earthquake Waiting To Detonate.” Sources Say Reynolds Feels “Fully Vindicated — And Ready To Expose What Really Happened,” With Legal Experts Warning This Case Could Unleash Fresh Evidence, Confidential Communications, And A Level Of Scrutiny The Government Is Desperate To Avoid. One Insider Put It Bluntly: “If This Goes To Trial, There Will Be No Going Back.” Another Warned: “This Could Rewrite The Entire Higgins Saga — And It Won’t Be Pretty.” The Shockwaves Are Already Spreading Through Parliament, With Staffers Whispering That This Lawsuit Could Become The Most Explosive Political Clash Of The Year.

[Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺 @PaulineHansonOz]

Here's another concern with the governments hate speech bill, Part 5.3B.

The Minister doesn't have to give a group any procedural fairness when listing them as a 'prohibited hate group'.

That means no due process, no consideration of the facts and no fairness before a decision is made.

If the minister lists a group, then it will be illegal to be a member, lead, recruit, fundraise or support the group. The minister can put these restrictions in place even if no one from the group has ever been convicted of a crime.

That's a huge amount of power to be used without any procedural fairness.