@Gweezy52@PlanetOfMemes The fact that the federal branches are equal (which I never disputed) doesn’t exclude tiers (i.e. levels) of authority in each one. Tiers are built into our government systems.
@maximoheadroom@lordwade66@PlanetOfMemes Yes. And I’m saying that it makes sense that POTUS would determine the constitutionality of an EO. Otherwise the opposition just farms the review to an opposition-favorable district judge.
@Gweezy52@PlanetOfMemes I’m just saying that a district judge is 2nd tier while SCOTUS is 1st tier. POTUS is 1st tier. Structurally it would make more sense for only SCOTUS or Congress to have override powers over POTUS, not a district judge.
@AgnesAmaka5309@MasterMaliq I wonder if Maliq will tell you that you have a bad translation. That these verses are about bunnies and rainbows in the original Arabic.
@gman5180 It’s literally the definition of a 2nd term president. That’s not insightful. And whether or not he has influence remains to be seen.
MTG is out to pasture.
If EO’s were illegal out of hand, they would have been outlawed a long time ago. The point here is that district courts should have no national jurisdiction over the president. That district court judge doesn’t have a mandate. And they aren’t top tier in their branch of the federal government. We have SCOTUS for a reason.