Siddharth Bagadia

it’s time to travel inside

[Siddharth Bagadia @sidd52988]

https://t.co/QRWIZYP4LU

[Jyot India @IndiaJyot]

Let's #ReclaimRanakpur

https://t.co/hoYyvS0xRD

Click on above link, it will take you to your email. Read the Letter to CM-Rajasthan & others, add your name & mobile number at the bottom. Send the email.

Scan QR CODE below to gain complete information about Ranakpur Tirth.

[Bhavik Lalan @LalanBhavik]

A learned and scholar Jainacharya meted with such a biased treatment because of supporting truth and raising voice against the faulty structure of AKT, who has encroached upon the rights of Shree Chaturvidh Sangh.
@IndiaJyot @hChhapiaTOI

https://t.co/WbDGzS5hBy

[Bhavik Lalan @LalanBhavik]

Sir,
This Jainacharya has extra ordinary vision and has shared his insights months in advance. You may find them in #JainacharyaOnWorldOrder

[Gaurav Lalan @Arihant9999]

16. BUT this Mob seized P. Pandit M.S.’ Upadhi (Belongings) & blocked access to it & amidst this pots of water of P. Pandit M.S’ Samuday were also broken & the trustees did not bother to even arrange for water for them...31

[Gaurav Lalan @Arihant9999]

15. This went on from 7:15 am to 3:30 pm. Amidst this the mob of Shravaks and Shravikas behaved in a manner which no decent Human being should. P. Pandit M.S has Cardiac & Lung & Breathing ailments with Major Spondylitis issues...30

[Gaurav Lalan @Arihant9999]

14.1 NOTE: P. Pandit M.S responded by stating that such a resolution is ULTRA VIRES (An action or doing beyond one's legal power or authority) the LAW, ULTRA VIRES the CONSTITUTION and ULTRA VIRES the TRUST DEED!!! Over and above that, it is against the Jain Scriptures!...29

[Gaurav Lalan @Arihant9999]

13.3 Especially when Samuday is in vihar & distance between Bhandup & South Mumbai is admittedly very long & practically impossible to travel in a day...28

[Gaurav Lalan @Arihant9999]

13.2 NOTE: Their passing of such a resolution is illegal & unconstitutional in itself. To add 2 that if such an illegal resolution has been passed, it automatically strengthens da fact that these r special circumstances wherein da need for Avagrah is eliminated as per Aagams...27

[Gaurav Lalan @Arihant9999]

13.1 P. Pandit M.S. asked for a written copy of this resolution which they outright denied to produce or share with him. They just read out this alleged resolution to P. Pandit M.S....26

[Gaurav Lalan @Arihant9999]

12.1 (On what grounds can they pass such a resolution and who gave them these rights in the Jain Sangh? Or is this one more reaction to the whistleblower act of Pandit M.S.)...25

[Gaurav Lalan @Arihant9999]

12. The mob of Shravaks which included the Trustees of trust responded by saying that they have passed a resolution to not let P. Pandit M.S and his Samuday enter this Upashray...24

[Gaurav Lalan @Arihant9999]

11. To this P. Pandit M.S. asked the reason behind their demand to leave this Tapagachchh Shwetambar Murtipujak Jain Sangh Upshray...23

[Gaurav Lalan @Arihant9999]

10.1 (On what basis did they verbally attack P. Pandit M.S? Who gave Shravaks & Shravikas the authority to remove a Mahatma from an Upashray?)...22

[Gaurav Lalan @Arihant9999]

10. Further the mob of Shraavaks & Shraavikas from the Sangh started protesting & shouting slogans against P.Pandit M.S demanding him to leave the Upashray immediately...21

[Gaurav Lalan @Arihant9999]

9. It is to be noted that the other Acharya bhagvant present in the upashray started his vyakhyan around 8am instead of scheduled 9am & delivered speech to provoke the crowd against Pandit Maharaj & his Samuday...20

[Gaurav Lalan @Arihant9999]

8.1 NOTE: A Jain Sangh comprising SADHU + SADHVI + SHRAAVAK + SHRAAVIKA is considered as 25th Tirthankar, but here the Mahatma is claiming that a Pramukh is Sangh which is a grave misappropriation...19

[Gaurav Lalan @Arihant9999]

8. The Mahatmas already present in the Upashray stated that the Trustees of the Sangh have also been selected or elected & hence the Pramukhs are only the Sangh!!!

(How can Shraavaks be called as Sangh that too by Sadhus and Acharya Mahatmas?)...18

[Gaurav Lalan @Arihant9999]

7. Ghatkopar Munisuvrat Derasar Navroji Lane Upashray IS NOT A PRIVATE UPASHRAY & hence trustees do NOT have rights to call for the removal of a MAHATMA from the Upashray...17