An Indian , рдХрд░реНрдордгреНрдпреЗрд╡рд╛рдзрд┐рдХрд╛рд░рд╕реНрддреЗ рдорд╛ рдлрд▓реЗрд╖реБ рдХрджрд╛рдЪрди ред рдорд╛ рдХрд░реНрдордлрд▓рд╣реЗрддреБрд░реНрднреБрд░реНрдорд╛ рддреЗ рд╕рдВрдЧреЛрд╜рд╕реНрддреНрд╡рдХрд░реНрдордгрд┐ рее
@Priyaa_Purohit Osama Bin Laden was also a scholar by the way . Highly educated. Can you please check with US of his scholarly credentials. So that when next time you use Scholar word , who exactly know where to use
@SauravDassss This is another example of absence of good рд╕рдВрд╕реНрдХрд╛рд░. When some one says what is this beta-beti . Non bharatvasis probably have this problem. May be their society where they grew up - have not evolved with right code of conduct as progressive as Bharatiyas
@LiveLawIndia@1Simranbakshi First of all stop calling the youth of this рдорд╣рд╛рди civilisation as Gen Z. Its like belittling Indian youth stature.Indian youth are special who are a generation from the ancestors which held progressive standards of Dharm and Karm ..Why use "Z" it has a woke Zombie innuendo
@SauravDassss Beyond disgusting is one who initiated this by naming Ajit Bharti familyfemale member & Ajit reacted to that .So the one to be nailed is that guy who initiated such subject discussion. Ajit was agitated as any dignified person would. But He used bad words with right facts
I have been pursuing this Political and Business Bucanneer for the past 15 years over a case of open and shut fraud
As telecom minister Maran, the bucanneer, installing a 1000 line secret Telephone exchange case in his home in the name of the Regional Manager of BSNL unknown to the system was a famous expose by me in the New Indian Express in 2010
He was using it for uplinking Sun TV progs and benefitting hundreds of crores. The secret phones were also national security breach as they could make any call to anyone without being monitored. At that time the DMK was in love relation with the biggest national security risk the LTTE
But the buccaneer with his money political power and media power delayed a case which could he completed in months by a decade
This is the 7th time the buccaneer telecom minister went to the supreme court to quash and/or delay the CBI probe into the fraud exposed in 2010
The case was investigated in 2007 by an honest inspector of CBI who used to go by scooter from Beasant Nagar to Shastry Bhavan in Chennai. He risked his life and asked for permission to file FIR.
But the UPA govt of which the DMK was a constituent prevented the CBI from registering FIR
I had to file a writ in Supreme court in 2014 to direct the CBI to file FIR
The buccaneer went to the High coourt and then to Supreme Court and almost got the case quashed with the then Attorney General almost colluding with them
The AG who had given opinion to govt that the secret phones were in breach of national security conceded in the court contrary to it
I had to write a scathing article to expose the Attorney
During the hearing then CJI even said it is after all 1.72 cr cable laying expenses and that can be paid by Marans and the case closed.
Then I wrote an article saying that it is not a case of cable laying expenses but secret telephone exchange of over 1000 lines installed at the ministers home and used for uplinking Sun TV progs (for which a secret cable laid at a cost of 1..72 cr) the benefit in which would be hundreds of crores
I also reminder the Supreme court that just months before the court had confirmed sentence on a clerk for accepting a bribe of Rs 265 declaring that corruption should not be tolerated
I wrote that if a clerk has to go jail for a bibe of rs 265 the higher the stature of the corrupt greater should be the punishment
That attempt to quash the case failed and the charges were framed.
Then a pliable trial court first discharged them.
I scathingly attacked the trial court order as perverse
The Madras High court set aside the perverse order and the buccaneer minister went to the supreme court.
The supreme court asked them to face the trial
They delayed the trial by several years and now the trial is over and all witnesses had been examined.
Then the buccaneer began another round of litigation to delay the trial by getting Madras HC to order that the present telecom secy be summoned as court witness .. an absolutely untenable order
The CBI came in appeal to the SC against that order and shockingly the AG who appeared for the CBI earlier appeared for the buccaneer!
Then in a detailed article the OpIndia recounted the whole case from the start and the role of the then AG and now Maran counsel
https://t.co/ygmfwthZIj
After the OpIndia article the then AG didn't appear in the case
The SC finally told Maran that the telecom secy may be called not as court witness but as defence witness.
What is the difference
If he is a defence witness his statements will be admissible against the accused
Not if he is a court witness
They will now.probably not call the telecom secy as defence witness
Hopefully the trial will conclude soon and justice will be done
....20 years after the fraud was discovered by CBI but blocked by UPA
....16 years after it was exposed by me in the New Indian Express
...12 years after the legal battle began
https://t.co/V84GRbYt7q
70% of the freedom fighters executed by the British were Brahmins.
They sacrificed their lives for the country. But what exactly did their sacrifice achieve?
Today their children and grandchildren are discriminated against by the Government. They are labelled as "oppressors" and systematically barred from education and jobs.
Is this how a country should honor those who gave up their lives for her?
Source: The plight of Brahmins by renowned historian Meenakshi Jain @IndicMeenakshi
(PS: I have not independently verified the numbers)
Debunking the following fake historical oppression stories: A master ЁЯз╡
-Breast Tax
-Jhadu Matki
-Bhima Koregaon
-No Education to Shudra/Dalit
-No Shudra/Dalit Pujari
Big Thanks to all who contributed to debunking all these claimsЁЯЩП
Save this ЁЯз╡ for future references.
India is governed by its Constitution, not the Manusmriti. The Constitution of India was framed by the Constituent Assembly under the chairmanship of Babasaheb Dr B. R. Ambedkar and is the supreme law of our Republic.
Yet Rahul Gandhi repeatedly misquotes and selectively invokes the Manusmriti to peddle an anti-Hindu narrative.
What makes this even more ironic is that he seems not to know what Mahatma Gandhi and his own great-grandfather Jawaharlal Nehru actually said about Manu and the Manusmriti.
On 4 May 1928, Gandhi wrote to P. T. Pillay:
тАЬI do not regard Manusmriti as an evil. It contains much that is admirable, but in its present form it undoubtedly contains many things that are bad and these appear to be interpolations. Whilst a reformer would therefore treasure all excellent things in that ancient code, he would expurgate all that is injurious or of doubtful value.тАЭ
Reference: M. K. Gandhi, Letter to P. T. Pillay, 4 May 1928, The Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi, Vol. 36, Letter No. 348, p. 294.
Then, on 1 May 1955, Nehru said at a public meeting in New Delhi:
тАЬThere is no doubt about it that Manu and Yagnavalkya were great souls and we must read what they have written with respect and think about it.тАЭ
He immediately added that the India of their time was entirely different and that he could not accept the social organisation of two thousand years ago as necessarily appropriate for the present.
Reference: Jawaharlal Nehru, Peaceful Transition to Socialism, speech at a public meeting on May Day, New Delhi, 1 May 1955, Selected Works of Jawaharlal Nehru, Second Series, Vol. 28, pp. 60тАУ70.
And four days later, during the Lok Sabha debate on the Hindu Marriage Bill, Nehru said:
тАЬHe quoted, he referred to Manu and Yagnyavalkya, very great men in our history, who have shaped IndiaтАЩs destiny. We admire them. They are among the heroes of our history.тАЭ
Nehru then made his position clear: Manu and Yagnyavalkya could not simply be invoked as тАЬa witness as to what should be done in the present conditions of India,тАЭ because society had changed dramatically.
Reference: Jawaharlal Nehru, The Hindu Marriage Bill, speech during the third reading in the Lok Sabha, 5 May 1955, Selected Works of Jawaharlal Nehru, Second Series, Vol. 28, pp. 468тАУ478; Lok Sabha Debates, Vol. IV, Part II, 22 AprilтАУ7 May 1955, cols. 7954тАУ7968.
The lesson is simple.
Respecting civilisational inheritance does not mean treating every ancient prescription as immutable law. Hindu civilisation has survived precisely because it has the intellectual and spiritual capacity to debate, reform and evolve from within.
The least Rahul Gandhi can do is read and learn from what even his own family members have said, rather than remain a prisoner of the Dimaagi Naxals who seem determined to feed him a caricature of Hinduism.
Hinduism has reformed from within for millennia and it will continue to do so.
But selective quotation and deliberate misrepresentation are not reform. They are propaganda.
@IndiaToday This milieu has developed where women feel unsafe outside their home is result of culture created by political class since Independence.Majorly shaped by Congress , SP , RJD , DMK , CPI for almost 70 years.Nirbhaya was result of selfish elements grown in society over years.
@RahulGandhi you belong to no one means disconnecting with father,husband, son,Be loud means be рдмрджрддрдореАрдЬ.Fight for your space - in-laws рдХреЛ рджреВрд░ рд░рдЦреЛ рдЕрдкрдиреЗ se .Be alone & lonely.Innuendos for women leading to such acts in garb of motivation. And shocking some Indian clapping.Breaking family act
@INCIndia рдХреНрдпрд╛ confused рдмрдВрджрд╛ рд╣реИ. What is Job of country ?? Country рдХреЗ citizens job рдХрд░рддреЗ рд╣реИрдВ. Govt job рдХрд░рддреА рд╣реИ. Imagination рд╕реЗ рджреБрдирд┐рдпрд╛ рдирд╣реАрдВ рдЪрд▓рддреА, that's not the right word to invoke.рд╕рдмрдХрд╛ Rahu instigate рдХрд░ рд░рд╣рд╛ рд╣реИ рдЬрдиреНрдордХреБрдВрдбрд▓реА рдХрд╛ .рдЗрд╕реАрд▓рд┐рдП рд▓реЛрдЧ imagination or illusion рдореЗрдВ рд░рд╣рддреЗ рд╣реИ рдЬреЛ рдЗрд╕реЗ рд╕реБрдирддреЗ рд╣реИрдВ.
@kharge Surprised that people with so much experience putting things this way . PM cares fund was instituted during covid for only emergency and crisis situations. Like in India people buy gold and assets . Which are used for special times. This understanding shows zero wisdom.
@SauravDassss Did you pay for PM CARES fund ? It was contrubtion by Indians during the Covid times.This is meant for Emergency or Crisis management related to life,death matters . Development of schools is going on since 1947.WIP. Do your homework properly. By the way which school you studied?