"Today we are all social workers. What is this social, that is no more than work? That no longer even believes in its own existence in fact or in law, that believes only in its forced reproduction, in the framework of a market where it sees itself subjected."
-Baudrillard, FS
Elon Musk is determined to show us all why billionaires must not be given control of the public square. They will always suppress actual free speech to serve themselves and we must forge a path to public ownership of these spaces.
AT&T: $1,956,953
Coca-Cola: $1,028,838
Disney: $203,350
Nike: $99,000
Procter & Gamble: $144,000
Uber: $148,000
That's what these companies have given to anti-abortion politicians and PACs. Not only boycotts, but actions at their offices, stores, warehouses, factories, etc.
the purpose of taking to the streets is to overcome our fear collectively.
we do this by acting fiercely, by cheering on & protecting others who act in brave & dignified ways, and encouraging those on the sidelines to jump in & act
do not let yourself become a spectator
you don't need to obey march marshals.
megaphone activists will try to speak over you, and ultimately to govern you. mock them.
concern trolls who bully you with appeals to "safety" want to pacify you. ignore them.
cause a ruckus. block everything. refuse to go home. attack.
Leftist and liberals obessions with appearing respectable and making distinctions between "peaceful protests" and "violent riots" is a huge reason for this verdict and the demonization of Huber and Rosenbaum.
Learn from this shit please.
No good cops no bad protesters!
@WeBuyPinball@liedenbrock@NYCFirm@harvest_goth Yeah, but no one wants to go to a protest where nothing happens either. Protesting everyday waiting to be noticed is only a strategy for fatigue and burnout.
Again, ask UNL how their movement is doing and if the administration will be doing anything anytime soon..
"The use of philosophy is to sadden. A philosophy that saddens no one, that annoys no one, is not a philosophy. It is useful for harming stupidity, for turning stupidity into something shameful."
We shouldn’t reject democracy on the grounds that it isn’t an act of enunciative affirmation by some collective body.
But we can on the grounds that it historically cannot account for marginality. Which is where our final commitment ought to always lie.
@100yearsofskin @ptsdboy Agreed with all of this! Singularity against difference is another clear consistency as well. I would say he develops his concepts in complementary ways. You just have to read all of his work to notice the consistencies. Reading his interviews really helps make them clear too.
Here are some excerpts from "Requiem for the Media." Still a very important analysis here. We have to remember media is not a neutral form, no matter the platform or content.