Just an autistic, LGBT kid - 21+ | They/them | Babyfur/Kidfur- SFW | Together irl with @bobbkitty 10 years+ | Nonsexual | #ActuallyAutistic ♿ | Under 18 DNI.
Happy Birthday, Mualani!
#GenshinImpact#Mualani
Hey, Traveler! Over here! I've tested the water for you, and the temperature is just right!
Having you here at my birthday party makes my heart feel warmer and bubblier than any hot spring!
Huh? Hey, who's pulling on my hair...? A little Koholasaur?
Argh, you rascal! My braids aren't toys for you to mess around with! Waaah, let 'em go!
Want to see more videos and GIFs of Mualani? Hurry over to Genshin Impact's TikTok account to watch them together!
https://t.co/seVwVZSgOK
@axhsr_ The hilarious irony of fi-core members calling JP a scab when SAG considers fi-core workers to be scabs. Like Corina
“Financial Core/Fi-Core/FPNM are viewed as scabs or anti-union by SAG-AFTRA members, directors, and writers-most of whom also belong to entertainment unions.”
@RajaDaWulf My point in comparing to Rugrats was that they deem the content NSFW, sexual in nature, and thus banned. When the very same content was blasted all over our afternoon cartoons for decades. Still is today. Context matters more than a blanket ban.
@RajaDaWulf If you truly think Rugrats was intended for children you never really watched it closely with the eyes of an adult. Just sayin. None of the 90s nickelodeon cartoons were truly aimed for children ONLY. Tons of innuendos and adult references.
@TinyTrashMarten@Sciggles You're the one who brought it up again 24 hours later. I didn't even bring it up.
BTW. you should finish the commissions you owe people including my partner Bobkitty and Sirius. 👋
@TinyTrashMarten@furry_of@Sciggles She's lost the trust of a majority of us as it is. She made the absolute worst decision and she should've seen it coming if she truly had friends in the community she's targeting. My bets are also that whoever was hired was not a true babyfur/abdl but someone who plays the part-
@TinyTrashMarten@furry_of So why is she actively making it worse then? She could've stopped at "We received a ton of reports suddenly and had to revise how we handled them". Not suddenly back down and change the rules to include innocuous things that even daytime television cartoons depict.
@TinyTrashMarten@furry_of@Sciggles To think she's working on something is delusional at best. Unless that "working on something" is to cleanse the site of anything 'questionable' to bring in more payment etc. I mean, they ARE under a crap ton of debt, so......
@TinyTrashMarten@Sciggles Don't be an idiot. She literally just said herself that she's "trying to help" the community. By what, changing the rules underneath our noses and banning clean nonsexual content that involves a subcommunity that people just don't like?
@Sciggles Rugrats, the iconic 90's cartoon a majority of us grew up on, had depictions of dirty diapers on an infant. Had themes of potty training and toilet refusal. But how dare we draw it with our own characters, right? Labeling it as sexual & banning it isn't helping us.
@Sciggles You're no longer only going after actual pornographic scenarios with minor-aged characters. You're lumping entirely nonsexual scenarios - such scenarios that have been broadcasted on REAL cartoons for decades. Suddenly it's not okay on FA anymore. That's not "helping".