@ManuelBeltrn14@iamwither No. eso se decidió militarmente. Trump necesitaba sí o sí sacar a los chinos de Venezuela, lo logró con la operación militar, en Panamá si fue más sutil, peor también con amenazas.
@charly0153 También lo hizo para extorsionar a SurCorea y que muchos países le regalen los patriots, creo también es una jugada de sus amos, las ratas británicas.
Imposible mejor momento para recuperar este artículo del genio de la literatura Juan Manuel de Prada sobre Hermann Tertsch @hermanntertsch.
No tiene desperdicio y sigue de plena actualidad.
https://t.co/t0qS73xAlv
Lavrov didn’t signal flexibility. He drew the perimeter.
When he says the Americans have “understood everything” and that “there can be no NATO membership for Ukraine,” this isn’t diplomacy-by-optimism. It’s a post-mortem. A decade of Western policy just quietly expired, and not at the negotiating table, but under the weight of reality it could no longer bend.
Russia is no longer debating hypotheticals. NATO expansion into Ukraine is treated as a settled impossibility, not a bargaining chip. Moscow isn’t asking for assurances, it’s formalizing the outcome of enforcement. Calm language. Hard lines. That’s what power sounds like when it no longer needs persuasion.
Russia never needed theatrics. That habit belongs to Western Europe’s political class— hysterical chihuahuas yapping for attention while mistaking noise for power. Great powers don’t perform. They impose facts.
The same applies to Lavrov’s reference to territories “where Russians have lived for centuries.” This wasn’t nostalgia, but a cold, calm declaration. When Lavrov says these lands must “become Russian again,” he is signaling the redrawing of strategic geography, not the revival of a myth. It’s the return of history after decades of enforced amnesia.
And it doesn’t stop at borders. Lavrov listed the “restoration of the Russian language” and the “rights of the canonical Orthodox Church” as non-negotiables. These aren’t cultural tokens. They are the deep architecture of civilization, bulwarks against the synthetic nationalism, imported theology, and Western social engineering that turned Ukraine into a staging ground for permanent war.
Strip away the hysteria and the meaning is structural, not symbolic, no more ideological reprogramming, no more linguistic erasure, no more weaponized identity politics masquerading as sovereignty. Territory, language, faith, strategic depth, these are instruments of irreversibility, not topics for discussion.
Does Russia trust the United States? No. And it doesn’t need to. The U.S. system isn’t unreliable because of historical bad faith alone, it’s structurally incoherent by design. Administrations change. Bureaucratic, Deepstate sabotage. Allies freeload and provoke. What’s speaking now is not American virtue, it’s American constraint. Moscow knows this. That’s why it isn’t negotiating for hope. It’s engineering outcomes.
And notice who isn’t part of this conversation: Europe. That’s not a diplomatic snub, but a geopolitical consequence. Europe forfeited agency when it outsourced strategy to Washington and replaced statecraft with megaphone slogans. The new security architecture won’t be drafted in Brussels. It will be delivered to Brussels, finalized, signed, and sealed. Europe won’t negotiate it. Europe will be briefed.
This isn’t peace. Not yet, but It’s the end of the hallucination.
Russia now has an interlocutor who understands limits, even if that understanding came late. Russia isn’t naive about Washington’s neocon ambitions, it engages on the basis of constraints, not trust. Diplomacy didn’t return because the West found wisdom.
It returned because force imposed discipline and silence. And if the West attempts to resurrect its illusions under new names, it will find the perimeter unchanged, only the cost has doubled.
@JOSEOBDULIO Si Trump actuara contra narcotraficantes capturaría o daría de baja al primo de Pablo Escobar, dueño de esta cuenta de X por enviar más de 30 millones de kilos de cocaína desde los años 70.
@charly0153 Una pregunta técnica e hipotética Charly, si Rusia tuviera cazas Mig 31 despegados en Venezuela con sus respectivos misiles Kinzhal, estos podrían eventualmente hundir el Gerald Ford ?
@geoestratego A Rusia le conviene mantener las bases militares en Siria para la logística de allí hasta Africa como punto de partida, Golani con Siria seguirán recibiendo alimentos a cambio de aquello.