S BLOCK

[S BLOCK @simblocky]

@Karny88800014 @therealmissjo @apbiogenesis Evidently, you know nothing about the psychology of having been a victim of tape or sexual assault. Nor about the possibility of getting a conviction in the uk. Nor the traumatic experience of being treated like a perpetrator not a victim by the police during investigation.

[S BLOCK @simblocky]

@StretchMvP @james120793 “Blurted out” is an overstatement. But she does appear to say Hugh and corrects herself to say “who”.

[S BLOCK @simblocky]

@footballarre @james120793 Shame your personal entertainment comes at the expense of an exploited child though, isn’t it? Never mind. Keep salivating.

[S BLOCK @simblocky]

@BrutusMaximusX What is a nonce?

[S BLOCK @simblocky]

@cotupacs I think you’ve forgotten to include some more hashtags, such as #iloveperformativeoutrage, #dontknowwhatimtkingaboutbutthatwontstopme, #bandwagon

[S BLOCK @simblocky]

@DarrenAgus @cotupacs Quite right. Because questionable sexual behaviour is only ever exhibited by people on the left isn’t it.

[S BLOCK @simblocky]

@QuentinKirrin Respectfully, I disagree. If you’re the presenter and you publicly deny it is you then you’re insane, because your name will come out. If you’re not this presenter your denial is a statement of truth & everyone except idiots will accept it.

[S BLOCK @simblocky]

@KaatyyyG How has it been more difficult for them than any other male presenter who didn’t do it?

[S BLOCK @simblocky]

@Colin_Black @brawday Or, in the wake of numerous previous scandals where things were badly covered up, perhaps due process is now being assiduously followed to avoid past mistakes? Of course, conspiracy is much more entertaining…

[S BLOCK @simblocky]

@MoosyerCoo92 @brawday Why did you tweet this? It’s like saying that some people believe in ghosts but I’ve never seen one. If you don’t know something, you don’t have to tell us.

[S BLOCK @simblocky]

@AlMorrison14 @brawday Do you really think so?

[S BLOCK @simblocky]

@Hate_Fortnite2 @brawday Clearly. Perhaps you should turn your thoughts as to why the name hasn’t been released yet. There are gazillions of the explanations here to inform you. Why don’t you do a little bit of reading?

[S BLOCK @simblocky]

@gerryparker17 @brawday Any male presenter who isn’t the actual culprit can simply issue a single sentence denial and get on with their lives. It’s not that complicated, is it.

[S BLOCK @simblocky]

@Christo20960304 @brawday Yes, Rylan issued a single sentence denial. Then got on with his life.

Not that onerous for him really, was it.

[S BLOCK @simblocky]

@Bizru4 @clairebriggs46 @BohemianAtmosp1 Exactly. But they don’t want to wait. Their prurient curiosity demands to be satisfied regardless of the illegality of premature exposure.

[S BLOCK @simblocky]

@bonbees Yes, but it’s really not that onerous for every BBC male presenter to issue a single sentence denial on Twitter and get on with their lives. They would have to be clinically insane to be the man in question and issue a denial.

[S BLOCK @simblocky]

@SaraMon67689775 With Jimmy Savile, the BBC turned a blind eye. That isn’t the case here. They aren’t naming him at the moment because the law requires the BBC to keep his name out of the public arena while investigations are underway. Completely different.

[S BLOCK @simblocky]

@englishgeek82 Quite. Well said.

[S BLOCK @simblocky]

@fatima_usman_ No.

[S BLOCK @simblocky]

@steve8412 Actually, the BBC are operating within the requirements of the law at this moment in time. Sorry if that gets in the way of your prurient interest and need to be to titillated.