Simon Hastings

English, straight, XY, ‘That Lot’ member. No DMs please

[Jennifer Arcuri @Jenniferarcuri]

“Boris” can’t wait to go to war: his paycheck depends on it.

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

If you are not happy for the Government to put drugs in our food please sign the petition to stop Folic acid being mandated in flour in the UK. If you need more encouragement the addition of Folic Acid is supported by Bill ‘safe and effective’ Gates.

[Paul Weston @PWestoff]

If groups of Englishmen made their way to the coast and tried to physically repel the invading forces, they would be arrested by the British police / government and prosecuted by the King.

I mention this just to draw a distinction between the usual actions of sovereign governments when their country is invaded.

This is useful when working out precisely who the enemy, the traitor etc is, and which side to choose when the civil war inevitably starts.

[Jonathan Cohler @cohler]

IPCC HUMAN CO₂ ATTRIBUTION PROVEN MATHEMATICALLY IMPOSSIBLE

Fossil carbon contributes ≈ZERO to the observed rise in atmospheric CO₂.

The Keeling intercept has remained locked at δ¹³C_I ≈ −13‰ for five full centuries, while fossil emissions rose from essentially nothing to ~10 GtC yr⁻¹.

A large fossil fraction would have dragged the intercept toward −28‰. It didn't budge.

The only value consistent with a fixed intercept is
fossil fraction f ≈ 0.

IPCC’s own methods, own isotopic standards, and own data force the conclusion:

Human fossil emissions are not the cause of the rise in atmospheric CO₂. PERIOD.

The claim is mathematically dead.

Full mathematical proof:
https://t.co/qYpY0qiGxv

[leilani dowding 🌸🚜 ☮️ @LeilaniDowding]

No one should be funding the RNLI if you care about this country.

[Thom Aster @ThomAsterJourno]

There comes a point where shouting louder achieves nothing.

Protect your privacy. Protect your identity. Stop feeding every platform, database and algorithm a complete map of your life.

Going dark doesn't mean disappearing. It means becoming deliberate about what you share, who you trust, what you expose, and how easily you can be profiled.

Privacy isn't suspicious.
Anonymity isn't guilt.
Patriotism isn't extremism.

In an age of mass surveillance, digital ID, facial recognition and permanent data trails, privacy is something you actively defend.

🇬🇧 It’s time to go dark.

[Christian @InTheTrenchesUK]

The RNLI is not a charity. It is a maritime trafficking operation with a donation tin and a government lawyer for a chair.

You believed the yellow jerseys. You believed the volunteers. You believed your pennies were saving fishermen. They were funding something else entirely.

Meet Janet Legrand. Chair since 2023. Not a captain. Not a coxswain. A senior partner at DLA Piper who built her career representing governments in international disputes. Trinity Hall Cambridge. OBE. The Children’s Society. Every credential screams globalist bureaucrat. None scream rescue. She is not there to save drowning Britons. She is there to manage cross-border legalities while her organization ferries illegal migrants to your shores.

The governance structure is a closed loop of insider control. Council appoints Trustees. Trustees appoint Executives. Executives run operations. No external oversight. No independent review. A self-perpetuating machine that selects its own leadership, sets its own strategy, and answers to nobody but the mirror.

They tell you 7,800 volunteers serve the coast. The accounts tell a different story. £93.5 million on salaries and pensions. 58.6 percent of total spending. The CEO pockets £189,000, more than the Prime Minister. These are not volunteers. These are paid operatives carrying out a mission. The volunteer myth exists to suppress wages, evade labor laws, and keep you donating to what you think is a grassroots rescue service.

But the truth is international. The RNLI founded the International Maritime Rescue Federation in 1924. Today it coordinates 160 organizations across 50 countries. It is funded by Lloyd’s Register Foundation. It managed the migrant crisis in the Aegean Sea. It supplies boats, training, and equipment to foreign rescue teams. It is a node in a global network facilitating mass migration under the legal cover of maritime rescue.

Follow the chain. HMRC provides tax relief. The Civil Service Lifeboat Fund provides restricted cash. The government lawyer sets policy. The paid crews execute operations. The international network coordinates with 160 foreign bodies. Every link is controlled. Every link is funded. Every link leads to the same destination. Your money. Your coast. Their agenda.

Why does a coastal rescue charity need a government international disputes specialist as chair? Why spend nearly sixty percent of revenue on payroll? Why coordinate with 160 global organizations? Why does the governance structure lock out the public?

The RNLI is not saving lives. It is ending Britain. And you are still paying for the rope.

[Sam Ashworth-Hayes @SAshworthHayes]

One way of visualising the scale of migration to the UK: this isn’t a map of Britain at night. Instead, every dot of light is a company currently licenced to sponsor work visas.

https://t.co/Hn0IvSexgn

[Ian 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🇬🇧 @herrbartlett1]

What a deplorable sack of shit you are @Emily1910👎

[Simon Elmer @SimonElmer2022]

In recent years, and particularly since the watershed of 2021 and the flooding of the UK with 3.6 immigrants from non-EU countries, the idea has arisen that the people native to Britain are being systematically replaced in their own countries. This idea has come to be called ‘The Great Replacement’, and is not limited to Britain but applies to Europe, North America and all Western countries. Denounced by the corporate-funded Wikipedia as a ‘debunked white nationalist far-right conspiracy theory’, the Great Replacement, in actuality, was laid out in a United Nations policy document that was published in 2000 under the title ‘Replacement Migration: Is it A Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?’.

The ostensible aim of this document was to address the decline in size and the increase in age of the populations of the West, and the burden this places on the working-age population to support an increasingly large population of retired people. This is not a problem exclusive to the West, with China facing the same problem, largely as a result of the one-child policy instigated in 1980 as part of its economic reforms; but the UN policy paper limits its case studies to France, Germany, Italy, Russia, the United Kingdom, Europe and the USA, as well as Japan and the Republic of Korea. To address this problem, the paper proposes several scenarios.

The first scenario (I) calculates the likely population growth between 2000 and 2050 as projected by the United Nations; the second (II) calculates populations for the studied countries assuming zero migration; the third (III) calculates the migration required to maintain the size of the population at the highest level in the absence of migration after 1995; the fourth (IV) calculates the migration required to maintain the size of the working population (age 15-64) at the highest level it would reach in the absence of migration after 1995; and the fifth scenario (V) calculates the migration required to maintain the support ratio between the working-age population (15-64) and the retired population (age 65+) at the highest level it would reach in the absence of migration after 1995.

Published in 2000, today it is more than apparent which of the five scenarios the United Nations selected to be implemented by the member nations on their native populations. It is with the fifth scenario — which has the most extreme consequences for immigration, and which the other scenarios appear to be proposed in order to justify its implementation — that we should be concerned.

The Office for National Statistics reports that, in the year ending December 2025, the UK let in 813,000 long-term immigrants, of which 627,000 were from non-EU countries. The previous year, 2024, 1,012,000 immigrants arrived, of which 780,000 were from non-EU countries. In 2023, an astonishing 1,441,000 immigrants arrived, 1,188,000 from outside the EU. In 2022, it was 1,398,000 immigrants, 1,091,000 from outside the EU. And in 2021, 947,000 immigrants, 610,000 from outside the EU. These figures equate to the most extreme Scenario (V) for Britain, according to which the UN paper states:

‘Scenario V keeps the potential support ratio at its 1995 level of 4.09. Keeping this ratio would require 59.8 million migrants between 1995 and 2050, slightly more than one million migrants a year on average. The overall population would reach 136 million in 2050, of which 80 million (59 percent) would be post-1995 immigrants or their descendants.

‘The number of migrants needed to keep the population in working-age constant are about twice the level of the past decade [the 1990s]. Scenario V, keeping the potential support ratio constant, would demand more than one million immigrants annually. This would greatly exceed immigration rates that the country experienced in the past.’

In the accompanying table in the UN document, the exact figure for the number of immigrants to Britain between 2000 and 2025 is 23,687,000, at an average rate of 947,000 per year; and between 2025 and 2050 some 36,035,000 immigrants at an average rate of 1,441,000 per year. This makes a total immigration population since 1995 of 59,775,000, out of a projected population of 136,138,000, doubling the population of Britain today over the next quarter of a century. Of these, 26,299,000 will be under the age of 15; 88,239,000 will be of working age (15-64), supporting 21,600,000 people 65 and older, a support ratio of 4.09.

It is possible, therefore, logically to conclude — hopefully without incurring charges of ‘hate speech’ by the UK’s law courts — that this extreme scenario, exceeding anything the British people have ‘experienced in the past’, explains the number of immigrants being brought into Britain, the issuing of 221,000 work permits to non-EU immigrants in 2023 alone, and even the age and sex of those illegal immigrants permitted to arrive by small boats across the English channel.

And yet, despite the evidence of this document and the sharp rise in immigration in Britain and across Europe and the West it has determined, in March 2024 the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker Turk, an Austrian lawyer personally appointed by the UN Secretary-General, António Guterres, described the Great Replacement as a ‘conspiracy theory’, as ‘delusional’, as ‘racist’, as a ‘war on woke’, a ‘war on inclusion’, and — very much as Keir Starmer did — as directly influencing ‘perpetrators of violence’, finally asserting that ‘multiculturalism is the history of humanity’.

This is the sort of rhetoric we’re used to hearing from middle-class students holding Socialist Worker placards declaring ‘Refugees welcome’. That it is being repeated by such a senior jurist at the United Nations is an indicator of how forcefully — to the extent of equating its repetition with incitement to violence — the globalists want to bury this document and its implications for the Western world.

Extract from my new book, The Great Replacement and the Islamisation of Britain. If you want to know who is behind the UN policy of replacement migration, how it is being enforced on Western countries and to what ends, and what we, the British people, can do to save ourselves from being demographically replaced in our own homeland, you may be interested in a copy. The link is below.
https://t.co/kpQBeancvN

[Gleam @gleamapp]

Win the new Ninja Crispi Pro 6-in-1 Glass Air Fryer. 🍟

One winner takes home the clever combo that microwaves and air fries in a single appliance. Open worldwide, free to enter, and every action unlocks 20 bonus entries.

Enter: https://t.co/GBhBAt4zjz

[Scott Lewis @Scott_Lewis82]

They are lying about the numbers.

[The Jackal… @ToonDazza]

I 100% agree @andyburnham - let’s all retweet and help Andy out……

#GeneralElectionNow

[Alexandra @Alexandr4Denman]

Time to boycott the peoples postcode lottery then ? I had no idea thinking the fund would be going to British charities helping British people? I will not give money away to foreigners who don't belong here! What's your thoughts ?

[Neil Oliver @thecoastguy]

When more and more people realise "government" is organised crime that recognises no Law in pursuit of extracting money with menaces, things will inevitably get interesting.

[Alexandra @Alexandr4Denman]

Subway uses halal meat! The only way to stop this is not to buy from them and write in mass to tell their head office why! Let’s get this barbaric cruelty out of Britain

[•𝖕𝖆𝖕• @PappeP]

🍻🍷🥂 Join the Saxons Cock – Your Local for British Pride🥂🍷🍻
🇬🇧 Please share for maximum visibility

🇬🇧 Welcome, punters and patriots, to The Saxons Cock, a fast growing community on X where like-minded souls gather to celebrate our heritage, values, and love for country!
🇬🇧 Think of us as your virtual local pub: a warm, lively spot where you can pull up a pint, share a laugh, and stand shoulder-to-shoulder with folks who cherish what makes Britain great.

🇬🇧 We’re on a recruitment drive to welcome new faces and voices to our ever growing community
🇬🇧 Whether you’re a vocal champion of British pride or just want to connect with others who share your passion, there’s a seat at the bar for you.

🇬🇧 We’re a family of patriots, growing stronger together with an organic community to encourage an environment for individuals to follow, engage, and build connections with similarly minded folk.
🇬🇧 From our history to our future, we’re here to remember, honour and respect what makes Britain unique, and encourage you to join in, share your voice and amplify our message
🇬🇧 Like a proper pub, we’re all about lively chats, mutual support, and standing up for what’s right.

🇬🇧 How to Join?
1. Click the link on the comment below to join The Saxons Cock community on X
2. Follow our members, comment below, and give a shout to fellow patriots. Follow-backs help our community thrive
3. Share your love for Britain whether it’s a story, a meme, or a cheers to our culture. Let’s make some noise!

🇬🇧 Grab a virtual pint and join the growing fight to push back and work towards understanding how to get our country back, one post, one space, one follow, one proud moment at a time. Who’s in? 🍺🇬🇧

https://t.co/up1Xe5K0Ek

[Donna Louise @DonnaLouise1212]

Please sign 🙏.

[Sandy Tregent @SandyofSuffolk]

To put this into context and hopefully stop the panic, there are 2,660 people in hospital with flu. There are 704 hospitals in England.

So, in fact, there are only just over 3 people with flu in each hospital.

Calm down. Stop scaremongering.