I asked Claude to find UGC creators. The results are insane...
I gave just a simple prompt about a specific brand we're working with.
It immediately started researching public sources, blogs, databases, whatever it could find online, and after a couple of minutes, I got - nothing. Generic data about the marketplaces I've already known about.
No surprise. There are no maintained public databases of UGC creators anywhere.
Then I asked https://t.co/sFrmrRD8PL.
➡️ It already knew my brand and criteria
➡️ Started searching creators by hashtags on TikTok and Instagram
➡️ Scraped emails from their bio
➡️ Put everything in a Google Sheet
➡️ Asked to write them a brief
This is what we've been building towards - doing the work of a creative specialist in 2 prompts.
So that they can focus on the most important stuff that can't yet be streamlined.
We're opening this for free, drop me a DM ⬇️
This brand paid for one of these ads for over 400 days. The other is 4 days old.
Same brand. Same product. Both running on Meta right now.
Which one is the winner, A or B?
1. Answer in the comments 👇
2. Drop your brand in the comments and I'll make you 1 ad, recreated from a viral template.
The problem is the before/after body shot. Meta restricts transformation pics in weight-loss ads, so it most likely got flagged (under 100 impressions). The twin that's still running shows no body, just customer DMs + the bottle.
Drop your brand in the comment and I'll drop 1 ad for you, recreated from a viral template.
Can you spot why this ad died in 2 days?
Same brand, same product. Its twin has been live for 197.
It got under 100 impressions.
1. See the answer in the comments 👇
2. Drop your brand URL and I'll drop 1 ad for you, recreated from a viral template
Can you tell, which one of these 2 Bloom ads is AI?
One is live on Meta right now for a $200M+ brand. The other was 1-shotted with AI from just their URL.
A or B?
1. See the answer in the comments 👇
2. Drop your brand URL and I'll drop 1 ad for you, recreated from a viral template
110k people saw how we build Selzee(.)com last week.
Here's why it got attention 👇
I posted that dogfooding might be the best way to build a product people love.
Dogfooding means using your own product every day, before you ask anyone else to.
256 reactions. 92 comments.
Group 1 - people already doing it:
"You become your own early adopter."
"I wasn't aware of the term, but that's exactly what we've been doing."
Group 2 - people making fun:
"I have this pain. Therefore, the market has this pain 🤡"
The thing is, when you start, there is no customer feedback to listen to. So you better become your user #1.
And same as our customers, we have to post content every week. So we run it through our own agents.
Dogfood until someone yells at you. Then listen to them instead.
36 days this year will be in your worst 10%.
Yesterday was one of mine.
Then in the afternoon, answers start coming in.
And there's no better feeling than seeing positive feedback on Selzee from people working in creative field for years on end.
@maverickecom We've been working with Tiktok shops and yeah Fable works great, but so does the previous models, we haven't seen an advancement for this use case
@maverickecom You really said "scrape winning TikTok Shop videos" and then "rebuild them with new hooks, angles". Like what was the research for then, if you throw it away? 🤣