Indian motorists will gather in New Delhi on Sunday, in the first major protest against a flagship biofuel program intended to reduce crude imports and support farm incomes https://t.co/xJC0NMlj2m
🚨📣 Vozinha mengenai apa yang dia ucapkan ke Messi seusai pertandingan:
"Aku menghampirinya, dan bahkan sebelum aku sempat bicara banyak, dia langsung memelukku dan berkata: 'Kerja bagus. Kau kiper yang sangat hebat. Rakyatmu pasti sangat bangga padamu.' Mendengar hal itu dari sosok seperti Leo sungguh sangat berarti bagiku."
"Aku berterima kasih dan menjawab: 'Terima kasih, Leo. Kau yang terbaik.' Lalu aku meminta baju pertandingannya, dia tersenyum dan berkata: 'Tentu saja. Akan kuberikan padamu di lorong ganti.' Momen seperti ini akan selalu aku ingat seumur hidup." ❤️🇨🇻🇦🇷
Sungguh keindahan sepak bola dan kerendahan hati dua sosok luar biasa! ✨🤝
I just want to know 2 things:
1. Why didn't the graph show the touch of Veiga and then the other players? There was hardly a gap of 500 milliseconds
2. How the hell did the referee and VAR decide that Veiga's touch was accidental and he didn't try to clear it and fail?
A word about the so-called snicko graph that “proved” croatia striker matanovic touched the ball.
Darren Cann (referee decisions commentator on the BBC and, unfortunately for him, one of the least convincing men ever to see a microphone) said he was “100% certain” there was a touch that caused pasalic to be offside.
He based that certainty on “snicko” technology as this proved the touch.
This is what referee and VAR used to rule out the goal.
But even if you think snicko is a good idea (I don’t) there’s a massive problem with the snicko graph.
IT’S DOESN’T LINE UP WITH THE PICTURES!
Snicko shows one spike and we’re asked to believe that was the matanovic touch.
But there are 4 or 5 touches on the ball in a few seconds (the cross - matanovic? - portugal defender veiga - croatia’s pasalic - then gvardiol scoring).
Snicko shows one?
They have to show a graph where all five touches (if there are five) are represented and where the graph spikes line up perfectly with the footage.
That would remove all doubt.
The way it was presented makes no sense and looks corrupt to the core.
1 - Cristiano Ronaldo's penalty against Croatia was his only touch inside the opposition box in his 81 minutes spent on the pitch.
It was also his first-ever goal in the knockout stages of the World Cup.
Breakthrough.
🚨| CRAZY STAT: Even if you combine Kane's goals and Olise's assists this season, they're still 14 goal contributions behind Messi's 2011/12 season.😱
NOT HUMAN.👽🐐
🚨 FIFA are facing possible legal action after suspending Cristiano Ronaldo’s ban and letting him play Portugal’s first two World Cup games.
The 40-year-old was due to miss them after his red card against Ireland, but FIFA have changed his three-match suspension into one match — a move that’s sparked huge backlash.
Opponents drawn against Portugal in the World Cup group stages could now take the case to CAS to try and reinstate the original ban.
(Source: @MailSport)