I have a request to all of you. Please dont tag me to unfollow, block and other similar things from now on. I regularly check my timeline and see if there is anything to be done from my side. I am big enough to evaluate on my own whom to block, follow, unfollow, etc. Thanks.
A concert is announced months in advance. There are promotions, advertisements, ticket sales, schedules, venues, security, and an entire machine built to make sure people show up.
That's not even remotely the same thing as a massive crowd flooding the streets for someone who may or may not appear.
No announcement. No advertising. No campaign. No tickets. No guarantees.
Just a rumor.
And a name.
The name.
These two situations are not even sitting at the same table, let alone on the same side of it.
#CKJK
#JUNGKOOKxCALVINKLEIN
Aren't these people fed up with this dumb discourse? I don't know if I have ever encountered in the online world a worse community than armeries in terms of intelligence.
Jungkook would have been currently the greatest solo artist in the world if he had debuted somewhere else!
Jungkook zaten cok iyi birisi ama bts dışında baska bi grupta olsaydi karakterinde cok büyük bi farklilik olucakti her ne kadar zamanla karaketi gelisse bile ergenliğini bu kadar iyi geçmezdi diye düşünüyorum iyiki bts ile beraber cikis yapmis onu gerçekten hyunglari büyüttü 🥺🤏🏻
What now hon @JlMlNNNN ? Why the block and the usual dumb discourse with the solos, bla, bla, Cant you have a proper conversation? Come on, you will earn money from engagement. And if you are Jimin biased, why don't you use his photo as profile pic and header? Its not lucrative?
Honest question to 30 K armeries who liked such an offensive remark. Why? Do you get off on bellitling him? Does it make you feel in a certain way? What's the trigger in you? Is it failure in your own life? Do you have abandonment issues? Is it hidden hate? Envy? What?
BTS raised Jungkook – a fandom myth, what it gets right, what it gets wrong, and who it serves.
Did BTS raise Jungkook? – No.
Did they influence him? – Certainly.
Did they contribute to his development? – Undoubtedly.
Did fandom turn that influence into a mythology? – Absolutely.
Few ideas are repeated more confidently in BTS fandom than the claim that BTS raised Jungkook. After years of repetition, the statement has largely ceased to function as an opinion and started functioning as a fact. At first glance, it sounds harmless. It reflects the closeness between the members and acknowledges that Jungkook spent much of his adolescence alongside them. In that sense, the story contains a kernel of truth. BTS undoubtedly influenced Jungkook. They were an important part of his environment during some of the most formative years of his life.
The problem begins when influence becomes authorship.
One of the strangest aspects of the narrative is that it gradually shifts the story of Jungkook's development away from Jungkook himself and towards BTS as a collective. The phrase no longer means that they influenced him. It begins to suggest that they created him.
The moment you stop and take the statement literally, the implications become rather strange. If BTS raised Jungkook, then who exactly was responsible for the first fifteen years of his life? His parents, his family, his teachers, his friends, his childhood experiences, his own temperament and personality all quietly recede into the background. What remains is a simplified story in which seven young men somehow become the primary explanation for another human being.
The difficulty is that human development doesn't work that way. By the time Jungkook entered Big Hit, he already possessed values, habits, fears, preferences, strengths, weaknesses and a developing sense of self. He didn't arrive as a blank page waiting to be written upon. He arrived as a teenager. And teenagers are certainly influenced by the people around them, but
Influence is not authorship.
This distinction matters because human beings aren't passive recipients of social influence. They don't simply absorb whatever is placed in front of them. They interpret experiences, accept some influences, reject others, imitate certain behaviours, resist others and make choices of their own. Two people can grow up in the same environment and emerge very differently because development isn't something that happens to a person. It's something that happens through a continuous interaction between the person and their environment.
Yet the fandom narrative often leaves remarkably little room for that process. Every admirable quality becomes evidence of somebody else's contribution. Jungkook's discipline, work ethic, kindness, maturity and resilience are repeatedly explained through BTS. The explanation is often waiting before the observation is even complete. At some point, the person himself begins to disappear behind the explanation.
However, the same narrative rarely operates in reverse. The same people who insist that BTS deserve credit for Jungkook's virtues often abandon the logic the moment he makes a mistake. Responsibility suddenly becomes individual. Agency returns only when it's useful. BTS become the authors of his strengths, but never the authors of his flaws. That isn't a coherent theory of human development. It's a selective narrative designed to protect a preferred conclusion.
The contradiction becomes even more visible whenever Jungkook is discussed as an individual rather than as a member of BTS. Anyone who has spent enough time in the fandom has probably seen this pattern play out repeatedly. The same people who describe Jungkook as uniquely talented, hardworking or charismatic can become surprisingly uncomfortable the moment those qualities are discussed independently of BTS.
As long as his achievements can be interpreted as evidence of BTS's influence, the narrative is celebrated. But when Jungkook's individuality becomes too visible, the tone often changes. We are reminded that "BTS is seven". We are warned about solo narratives. We are told that focusing too much on one member is somehow dangerous. In practice, this means that Jungkook's individuality is welcomed only when it can be comfortably absorbed back into the collective identity of the group.
The narrative, therefore, moves in only one direction. BTS are allowed to explain Jungkook. Jungkook is rarely allowed to explain himself.
This brings us to the most interesting question: who does this narrative serve?
At first glance, it appears to honour BTS. But its deeper function is to protect a particular vision of BTS as a collective. The story helps preserve a vision of BTS in which the group remains the primary source of meaning, identity and development. It keeps the collective at the centre of the narrative and discourages interpretations that place too much emphasis on the individual.
The most significant cost of the narrative is that Jungkook is rarely allowed to occupy the centre of his own story. His growth becomes evidence of BTS. His success becomes evidence of BTS. His character becomes evidence of BTS. Even his individuality is often interpreted through BTS. The result is that Jungkook is constantly discussed, but surprisingly rarely treated as the primary author of his own development.
In a strange way, the more he's praised, the less space he's given.
Perhaps the greatest irony is that the narrative overlooks what is actually most impressive about Jungkook. What has always fascinated me is that fandom often treats influence as the interesting part of the story, when influence is actually the least unusual thing about human development. Everyone is influenced by other people.
What is impressive is that he took those influences, combined them with his own temperament, experiences, choices and ambitions, and became a distinct individual rather than a replica of anyone around him. The story becomes less interesting the moment we reduce that process to "BTS raised him."
Ironically, a narrative intended to praise BTS often ends up diminishing Jungkook. Not because it criticises him, but because it leaves him very little room to exist outside the mythology built around him. He becomes less a person and more a product of a story fandom has told about him for years.
None of this requires diminishing BTS. They were undoubtedly an important part of Jungkook's life. That is significant enough on its own. Influence is real. Mentorship is real. Affection is real.
But influence is not authorship.
And human beings are not raised twice.
This fabricated narrative is an attempt to attribute Jungkook's talent—his ability to carry the group on his shoulders since he was 15, his influence now extending beyond the group, and in short, all his ethical values, work discipline, creativity, and abilities—to the group out of desperation.
“literally, the implications become rather strange. If BTS raised Jungkook, then who exactly was responsible for the first fifteen years of his life? His parents, his family, his teachers, his friends, his childhood experiences, his own temperament and personality all quietly recede into the background. What remains is a simplified story in which seven young men somehow become the primary explanation for another human being.
The difficulty is that human development doesn't work that way. By the time Jungkook entered Big Hit, he already possessed values, habits, fears, preferences, strengths, weaknesses and a developing sense of self. He didn't arrive as a blank page waiting to be written upon. He arrived as a teenager. And teenagers are certainly influenced by the people around them, but
Influence is not authorship.”
This is the never endind saga
Honest question to 30 K armeries who liked such an offensive remark. Why? Do you get off on bellitling him? Does it make you feel in a certain way? What's the trigger in you? Is it failure in your own life? Do you have abandonment issues? Is it hidden hate? Envy? What?
Jungkook with Vogue Korea
JK: I am here today at Calvin Klein Harajuku to celebrate this wonderful collaboration with Calvin Klein.
What do you think defines Calvin Klein’s unique sense of sexiness?
JK: To me, Calvin Klein's unique kind of sexiness is something light and natural. Not an obvious or straightforward kind of sexy, but the kind of sexiness that comes from simply being cool.
Q. What do you think is the most ‘Jungkook-esque’ Calvin Klein look?
JK: I’d say it’s the look I’m wearing right now. I like leather, I like matching sets, I like denim, I like boots, I like all of it.
#JUNGKOOKxCALVINKLEIN
Japanese locals said they had never seen a crowd this massive in Harajuku before, and there was no official confirmation that Jungkook would attend.. JAPAN REALLY LOVES JUNGKOOK
A special 5 seconds from JUNGKOOK for ARMY 💜 That gaze, as if he's looking at you from the other side of the camera, is enough to make your heart skip a beat. Before you know it, an entire week may have flown by in the blink of an eye—just like Seven!? | Elle Japan
#JungkookforCalvinKlein #CKJK
Fresh from the release of his CKJK collection, Calvin Klein global brand ambassador and BTS superstar Jung Kook appeared at the brand’s Harajuku flagship store for the “Jung Kook for Calvin Klein” event. The Golden Maknae arrived wearing a piece from the CKJK collection he co-designed, embodying Calvin Klein’s distinctive aesthetic attitudes and the effortless masculine edge that underscores his personal style. | GQ Hong Kong
JUNGKOOK AT CKJK EVENT
#JUNGKOOKxCALVINKLEIN