@hermanng0ring These two were in fact not classified as the same race. Goebbels was classified as Westisch/Mittelländisch (Anglo terms: Med) and Heydrich was classified as Nordisch + Dinarisch. It would be best if Nongermans just shut up about NS forever, it will not help you for a new ideology
This is very true. Most “socialism” is just people who think they’re entitled to an upper middle class lifestyle in an expensive city on the cheap. Boomers were right yet again.
Considering how birth rates are declining across the Third World, there is some hope that the White populations in America and Europe could rebound. There won’t be any grand imperial ambitions for quite a while, nor should there be if we’re being reasonable.
The main issues lie first and foremost in minimizing the amount of foreigners entering Western countries, and second in figuring out how to deal with the oversized generation that resulted from a combination of previously high birth rates and Western aid. They are the equivalent of Boomers for the developing world.
But overall the measures outlined in the Kissinger Report seem to have been effective in the long term.
true. One could call it “pop socialism” I guess. None of these people talk seriously about worker ownership over production or an actual shift in the way resources are used (which is distinct actually from mere redistribution). Actual Marxists at least had a holistic perspective
“Affordability” is the call word of the DSA Left. This is quite revealing.
First off, they are ideological “NIMBYs” and thus oppose new housing. They want affordability through price freezes, not creation.
Secondly, and more importantly, there is something deeply consumerist about “affordability.” It is not about production but cheaper goods to consume. The DSA, in its way, wants to make capitalism affordable, smoothing out rough edges. Whether they will succeed at this is an open question—I think their policies are obvious duds. The point is they don’t have a revolutionary or transformative consciousness. It’s “affordable groceries!” … “let’s bankrupt your landlord!” … or “get to your job cheap on the bus!” It’s the equivalent of MAGA’s “no tax on tips!”
Marx laughs at these petty bourgeois reactionaries!
This is a semantic game.
When Sasha says “breed out” he means literal total eradication. It's true, you cannot breed out criminality. But the substantive claim is not “eradicate the trait.” It is “select against a trait and shift its population distribution.” Domesticating wolves into dogs did not eradicate aggression, but we would all prefer to live in a society of dogs compared to wolves. 🧵
@Randsavr@ZeilZulu This is pretty apparent throughout all of capital by Marx, that capitalism is based on the existence of wages inexchange of labor power, regardless of who technically does it, China has wages, ergo it has capitalism.
@Randsavr@ZeilZulu Socialism is not when the government owns or runs strategic industries, because ultimately the exploitation of labor and the subsequent extraction of surplus value from the laborer exists, socialism is a mode of production posterior to that relations aholishment,