@rxdna_983@esyrdalen Yeah there were a few Romans with Thuringi material culture in Gretzinger 2025 „In contrast to these earlier results, we do not find evidence that the two different ancestries were correlated to differences in material culture“ but many Thuringi were pretty pure Angles and Warini
The Brücken Thuringi. When I compare them to the Proto Thuringi from Hassleben, the biggest difference is that the Angles and Warini came and nordified the region. However, Romans also came to the region, likely because of the alliance with the Ostrogoths.
@brg_third@rxdna_983 I have read the Preprint a long time ago, so not 100% sure about the following: but my understanding is that they used Häven, calling this Region "Celto"-something is quite something
@swedishestfella@_agathokles@nordicizer I framed it like that so that you see how stupid Coon is. How are historical Celts Nordic for him because of the Skull, then Southern Germans are his Alpine type. It's very very stupid what he created with his book
@swedishestfella@_agathokles@nordicizer No Swedes invaded Germany in 1950, so why the change? It is an environmental trend, nothing more. The historical Celts in Austria were dolichocephalic and were called Nordic by Coontard „„Alpine““ South Germans are these formerly „„Nordic““ Celts
@_agathokles@swedishestfella@nordicizer These 2 not talking about DNA and also not about what normal people in downtown would call Nordic, they are deep inside some outdated physical anthropology, in this world a Swarthoid like Lothrop Stoddard is „Nordic“. A 2018 study debunked their bs even inside their own „rules“
@nordicizer „Cranial secular change from the nineteenth to the twentieth century in modern German individuals“ Jellinghaus et al. 2018. There are pictures of you on X that you posted
@FortressLugh Czech LaTene is very Germanic. It's not something that i just say or something it's a PCA fact. Not good to use it.
https://t.co/3uKvgKeiJm
Most of the Germanics in Czech_IA_LaTene plot on top of modern German variation. The 3 fresh from Scandinavia not, but the rest. They either started more Central or have Celtic. You can see in 2/2 that they are Nonlocal. Also look at modern PL versus the 7 unnamed PL_Medieval 1/2
@HeinrichHyper@LjudevitKaj A good map would be definitely whole BRD is one culture, the Deutsche culture, and maybe (a big maybe) put Austria together with Czechia and the good parts of Croatia. But Slovakia, Poland absolutely totally foreign. They straight up belong almost (almost) in the Russian culture
@LjudevitKaj What the fuvk is a Balto-Prussian culture? The Prussians that you are thinking about are Brandenburger. Protestants. What have Polish Catholics culturally to do with them. Or Balts lol. Brandenburg belongs in the same culture as France.
The McColl Germanic study is good but a bit weird „We are trying to understand the spread of Germanic, so let’s look at Medieval samples from England and Italy and not at the Iron Age Przeworsk culture. Iron Age Netherlands is not Germanic because it's not like Medieval England“
@ThelastPretanni@heatmappr You mean the one with the Celtic-like samples from the 3rd century? I would say they are not close because of that, but because of Slavic