That commentator interprets my view as “hate speech is not a problem,” but this is a misunderstanding of the facts.
My position is that while hate speech itself is indeed a problem, it is wrong to hinder or deny someone the opportunity to speak at a public event based on their past statements before they have even expressed their views.
Speech should be subject to criticism after the fact, and should not be banned based on a speaker’s attributes, including their past statements.
To my friends overseas: A problem is occurring that will have a significant impact on Japanese content creators. The issue of censoring sexual content and the problem of Article 175 of the Penal Code are unique to Japan, but I would appreciate it if you could share this issue widely.
This latest Lunduke horseshit only cements what we should already know. All the conservative whining about cancel culture when they were on the backfoot was purely performative. The intention was always to seize the tools of cancel culture and weaponize them against everyone else
Jesus... this is what Lunduke is sperging out over:
https://t.co/p8P5BYD56l
The tamest shit imaginable. Absolutely raped mentality. Get fucked, Lunduke.