CharSiuHead

[James Wood 武杰士 @commiepommie]

For anyone wishing to understand how China is governed. I highly recommend watching the following documentary.

https://t.co/noPx1zYqF5

[Communist Party of Genovia @MissPavIichenko]

For context: Sukeo Ida was a Japanese Communist who was sent to fight in China. He stole 100,000 rounds of ammunition, left it where the Chinese could find it, and killed himself.

[薛丁丁归来 @xuedingding01]

日本媒体报道，本月3日，两艘中国海警局船只在琉球与那国岛海域进入日本所谓的“专属经济区”。
日本海保厅通过无线电的呼叫，中国海警局的船只回应"这是中国管辖区域的常规巡逻".
很好！琉球从历史和国际法上本来不属于日本，这片水域也根本上不属于日本。#japan

[愛国心の足りないなまけ者 にきめっ！ @tacowasa2nd]

日本採用したらどうだ。
ああでもそうすると国技の公文書改竄が出来なくなるか。

[绵大王 @dawang415]

老中把舆论管的实在是太严了，翻墙之前我啥都不知道，以为就只有个南京大屠杀，其他的只字不提，结果： 冀中五一大“扫荡” 凤阳城大屠杀 朔县大屠杀 宁武城大屠杀 长沙大屠杀 南县厂窖大惨案 海南大屠杀 苏州大惨案 无锡大惨案 江阴县大屠杀 芜湖大屠杀 镇江大惨案 常州血案 盐城大屠杀 日军在信阳的暴行 日军在武汉的暴行 晋东南地区大“扫荡” 湘潭大惨案 横峰大屠杀 日军���湖南的暴行 湘桂战役期间大屠杀 平顶山惨案 济南大屠杀 梅花镇大惨案 潘家峪大惨案 老黑沟惨案 临江大屠杀 依兰大屠杀 上海���山卫大屠杀 新宾县大屠杀 成安大屠杀 血洗浚县城 临沂大屠杀 原平三大惨案 桃源县大屠杀 临澄县大惨案 血洗常熟 天镇城惨案 保定城惨案 固安县惨案 血染灵丘 正定大惨案 血洗赵县 济阳城的血泪仇 东亭许巷血案 杭州大屠杀 盱眙城惨案 吉安惨案 屠城凤阳 豫北新乡大惨案 长治大惨案 太湖马迹山大惨案 滕县大屠杀 长垣城惨案 合肥大屠杀 扫荡周家瓦房、卸甲店 汉王惨案 阎窝惨案 金乡三千民工遇难记 淮北牛眠村大屠杀 晋城大屠杀 南澳岛大屠杀 常营村大屠杀 晋东南武乡县扫荡 入侵汨罗县 昔阳县大惨案 冀鲁豫区“五五”大惨案 安国城大惨案 太岳区根据地大“扫荡” 蠡、安、博地区大“扫荡” 太行山区大惨案 沁源大惨案 日军血洗山西兴县 沁县大惨案 应县下社惨案 灭绝人性的“四一二”大扫荡 海南岛汀迈大惨案 平陆县八政村大惨案 浦江县大惨案 北岳区大“扫荡” 血洗平山的两次大“扫荡” 日军侵陷惠州暴行 日军“扫荡”吴江四镇 内黄县枣林村大屠杀 龙陵人民的劫难 铺江、诸暨、东阳大惨案 金华惨案 松阳县大惨案 冀鲁豫区九·二七大惨案 昆山血案 文昌县文北大惨案 南阳惨案 潘家戴庄大惨案 苏中四分区进行残酷“扫荡” 阜平平阳惨案 任丘大屠杀 井陉老虎洞黑水坪惨案 常德屠杀 “扫荡”冀东 益阳城惨案 襄城六王冢血案 屠杀河南战俘 茶陵惨案 全州大屠杀 宁乡县大惨案 侵华日军在邵阳的暴行 武冈县大屠杀 江华县大惨案 广东揭阳惨案 桂阳屠杀 冈村宁次部队在桂林的屠杀 独山大惨案 荔波县城大屠杀 洋溪屠杀 乐会大屠杀 双峰山大屠杀 三亚荔枝“朝鲜村”大屠杀

[番茄大叔🇨🇳 @uncleTomat0]

到底是什么样的人，才会���信中国人伪装成韩国警察这种鬼扯的故事，编故事泼脏水都到这种下三滥无耻的地步了吗？😅

[James Wood 武杰士 @commiepommie]

🇯🇵 Sanae Takaichi, Japan’s anti-China PM, Exposed by Her Family: Her Grandson Started Full-Time at a Top Chinese University. She Was the Last to Know 🇨🇳

Japan’s most outspoken anti-China politician just faced a family situation that politics can’t sweep under the rug. Her only grandson has started full-time study at a top Chinese university this year. She found out after it was already decided.

Sanae Takaichi built a career on hardline confrontation with China. Yasukuni visits, constant red-line pushing, the usual right-wing performance that keeps her base energised. Yet the boy she expected to carry on the family name politically, her son’s only child, is now pursuing a full multi-year degree in China.

Not a short exchange. It’s a real undergraduate commitment at one of China’s premier universities, not a holiday program. The student bypassed the usual prestigious US and UK universities for a Chinese path.

The timing intensifies the pain. Only when the bags were packed and flights were booked did Takaichi learn the news. Her son, who is expected to take over her political endeavours, made the decision after personally examining Chinese higher education, specifically engineering and technology. He evaluated daily safety conditions, finding both options to be superior to the others.

Japanese media and online reaction has been merciless. “Anti-China is the job, running to China is real life” captures the mood in six words. Old clips of Takaichi attacking other politicians for being too soft on China are circulating with new captions asking how red her face is right now.

This isn’t an isolated case. Global political families are quietly making the same calculation. Trump’s granddaughter, Putin’s granddaughter, Vucic’s son and Biden’s niece have all spent time learning Chinese or studying in China. Once you look beyond the rhetoric, the pattern becomes clear.

The numbers back it up too. Japanese students heading to the US have fallen for five straight years while the flow toward China keeps growing. When families evaluating education quality, cost, safety and long-term opportunity look at the data, the results keep pointing in one direction.

Takaichi’s brand was built on painting China as a permanent adversary. Her own household just reached a different conclusion. That gap between public performance and private choice is the part that travels.

When the grandkids of the harshest critics are opting for Chinese universities, it makes you wonder where the real long-term investments are going.

[陳宇鎮 Official  @JinRyangKR]

#台湾 绿营���谣又翻车……
为了证明中国渗透韩国
台派青鸟称：
“中共强制要求韩国身份证使用中国名字”

😰 然而事实上
韩国身份证 一直以来就有汉字……👇

[黄淮 @kynkyn73670170]

李在明告诫高市早苗：日本须为过去罪行道歉，否则我们做不了朋友

对日犯下的罪行，应该更多遭受过苦难的国家站出来发声，而不应为了眼下的利益去“夸赞”日本是所谓的“世界模范公民”。

[陳宇鎮 Official  @JinRyangKR]

#台湾 脸丢大了！！！🔥
由于台湾造谣韩国，继韩国总统亲自驳斥台湾谣言后，韩国本土社群 Kakao Story 中的保守派右翼团体，严辞痛批来自台湾的谣言！许多右派网友怒批：

“台湾太疯狂了，一些被称作 绿色小鸟 的台湾群体，为了达到他们的政治目的，把我们这次努力对抗的共同民主党，说成是共产党，口号也改成灭中共，这太荒谬了”

“越来越认为台湾人就是中国人，哦不，他们比中国人还夸张”

下图第二张是翻译，以及更多韩国人痛批台湾青鸟的留言👇绿营台派 今天装睡 变冷清了，生怕被人看到脸有多肿……欢迎大家点赞，转发和评论 让更多人看到这些荒诞可笑的事🤡🤡🤡

[戎🐎少年 @0K7n9Nviz82KC9r]

台湾：我在中华民国水域执行任务！

大陆：两岸同属一个中国，我编队在我中国海域执行任务，请不要干扰我执行公务。

一个没落的地方割据政权，连孙文的雕像都被推倒了，还好意思打中华民国的招牌～联合国都不承认了！

[Red Pill Hong Kong 🇨🇳🇭🇰🫡🫡 @rphkg]

1/ Here's why Canada doesn't want to give permanent residency to Hong Kongers. Imagine living here. They're shouting slogans with bullhorns + blocking the street. TOTAL NUISANCE. Also contributes almost nothing to Canada economy. No wonder Canadians are SICK of them...

[乔华莘 @qiaohuanxin]

李在明脑子还是很清楚的：“韩国对过去遭受的苦难记忆犹新。如果日本总在问：‘我们已经道歉，还要再说一遍对不起吗？’，那么我们之间就无法真正建立起联系。”他表示由于民意，很难与日本签署自卫队与韩军的物资互通协议。

东北亚国家对日本��争罪行的统一态度：日本要深刻反省，反复道歉，绝不允许日本军国主义死灰复燃。任何与日本的军事相关合作都难以推进。

[Red Pill Hong Kong 🇨🇳🇭🇰🫡🫡 @rphkg]

This goes with my last post. Canada's pathway for Hong Kongers was to spite China after HK's new security law. Today, nobody cares about that law 🥱🥱 so Canada has no reason to keep HKers. Besides, most are PRO-RIOT, loves to protest and disrupt public spaces. BAD FOR CANADA.

[Angelo Giuliano 🇨🇭🇮🇹 @angeloinchina]

The U.S.-Japan-Philippines Triad: Provocation Disguised as Deterrence
Thread 1/5

The accelerating security ties between the United States, Japan, and the Philippines are not about “defence” or “stability.”
They represent a calculated escalation to contain China’s peaceful rise and keep external dominance over the Indo-Pacific.
What Western think tanks dress up as defensive cooperation is, in reality, the building of forward bases and proxy forces to encircle China’s maritime lifelines and prepare for Taiwan contingencies.

[田字格 @tianzige4]

海警巡查执法擦除日菲划线。日本菲律宾神助攻，大陆实质上接管台湾外海防务，台湾管好岛上就行了😃

[油爆琵琶拌着面🇨🇳 @zmx8067]

台灣省的臉面真的是被按在地上摩擦了🤣🇨🇳視頻顯示，台灣省船舶在台灣東部海域向中國海警匯報船隻人員情況，老老實實回覆「中國台灣2人」，關鍵還當著台灣省海巡署的面。

怎麼有點「目前犯」的感覺？🤔

[陳宇鎮 Official  @JinRyangKR]

还好我听得懂韩语……
韩国人喊的是 “再选举” 재선거
到了台湾……中文字幕全被改成“灭中共”
韩国人听了 都觉得尴尬……
台派重新定义了韩国右派的目标竟是灭共😳
大量这种离谱的谣言，流量反而很大………………
台湾没有墙，却通过造谣给自己盖上了井盖🐸

[K.L @kinglinzhuhui]

June 2 — Philippine Defense Secretary Teodoro: China’s aid to the Philippines, including agricultural supplies and fuel, is merely a publicity stunt and hollow.

[StarBoySAR 🇭🇰 🇨🇳 🥭 @StarboySAR]

Brilliant piece from Pearls and Irritations. Finally, someone in Australia is saying out loud what the rest of us have been watching for the past five years

Let's be clear about what AUKUS actually is: the greatest military protection racket in modern history. Washington looked at its own crippled submarine industrial base—17 boats short, yards choking, Congress screaming—and found the perfect mark. A wealthy, eager, insecure middle power with a bipartisan fetish for great-power relevance and a defense minister who treats strategic questions like a classified state secret

The deal? Australia pays half a trillion dollars. In return, it gets used Virginia-class hand-me-downs—Block IV boats with a decade of wear already on the hulls, probably smelling faintly of its previous crew

Even more intriguing, the article confirms for what this overpriced second-hand Australian "sovereign" nuclear submarine fleet is actually for:

Hunting Chinese Jin-class and Type 096 SSBNs. Not to protect Sydney Harbour. Not to secure Australia's trade routes. To find, track, and if ordered, destroy the Chinese nuclear submarines that threaten continental America!

That's the job. That's the whole job. Australia just committed A$368 billion to be the US Navy's underwater security guard!

The comedy of "sovereign capability" is almost too rich. Sovereign? The reactors are American. The combat system is American. The weapons are American. The fuel is American. The intelligence feed is American. The maintenance schedule is American. Permanently tethering Australia to U.S. software, maintenance, and logistics, effectively ending any "sovereign" capability. The only thing Australian is the taxpayer—and the Prime Minister standing in front of a camera calling this independence

Australia is not buying a submarine; it is buying a node in a U.S. sensor network. The acquisition deeply integrates Australia into the U.S. military command structure, making Australia a tool for U.S. strategic objectives in the Indo-Pacific — while a massive amount of Australian wealth is transferred into the U.S. military-industrial complex

And the timing is exquisite. Washington just added another half-trillion to its own defense budget while Australia is told to hit 3.5% of GDP. America gets the money, the boats, the basing rights at HMAS Stirling, and a Pacific ASW auxiliary. Australia gets the bill, the dependency, and the warm fuzzy feeling of being taken seriously by the adults.

The U.S. 2025 National Security Strategy (NSS) emphasizes "burden-sharing among allies" and "realist diplomacy." This submarine deal is the perfect execution of that strategy: the U.S. maintains its military overmatch against China by essentially "outsourcing" the financial cost of undersea surveillance to Australia 🤡

Paul Keating called this three years ago. He was mocked, of course. The press club gasped. The security establishment rolled its eyes. But he was right then, and this article proves he's right now. It is worse than he thought. It's not that AUKUS is of little military benefit to Australia. It's that AUKUS is of negative military benefit to Australia—actively diverting resources from actual defense needs toward a capability designed for someone else's homeland

https://t.co/f7lYAMf3JY