@masala_soda01@ShivAroor The point is no one is trying to justify those crimes done by those terrible men. But here, everyday there's someone trying to make this crime not her fault. That's the difference.
Dear Leadership Team of @vijaytelevision, the Creative and Production Leadership Team of @EndemolShineIND, and the Host @VijaySethuOffl,
This season of #BiggBossTamil has moved beyond reflecting reality and is now shaping it in socially damaging ways. What is being broadcast is no longer neutral reality television, but the repeated normalisation of toxic relationship dynamics on a platform with massive reach and influence, without ethical clarity, restraint, or accountability.
The ongoing portrayal of a relationship between two contestants raises serious concern. Patterns of emotional manipulation, repeated boundary violations, public humiliation, coercive behaviour, and moments of physical aggression are framed as attachment, passion, or emotional intensity. Rather than being addressed with clarity, these behaviours are edited or contextualised in ways that invite justification, defence, and even admiration.
The harm does not stop at the screen. For audiences, especially those entering new relationships or struggling within existing ones, these portrayals become reference points. When emotionally unhealthy behaviour is shown repeatedly without consequence, it becomes easier to justify and harder to recognise as harmful. Actions that should trigger concern are instead explained away as emotional reactions, situational stress, or personality traits. This is how damaging patterns migrate from entertainment into real relationships.
This harm is further amplified by the role influencers play in shaping how the content is interpreted and consumed. Influencers actively frame these dynamics for the wider audience, signalling what is excusable, admirable, or defensible. Through constant commentary and selective amplification, emotionally harmful behaviour is repackaged as love or strength, instructing viewers on how to rationalise what they are seeing. The programme supplies the content; influencers supply the moral framing.
Across multiple seasons, #BiggBossTamil has increasingly blurred the line between conflict and abuse, emotional expression and emotional coercion. This season, that erosion has become impossible to ignore.
Responsibility here is shared. Editorial choices and narrative framing sit with the production team, while broadcast, endorsement, and continued airing sit with the channel. Together, these decisions shape not only what is shown, but how it is understood, defended, and absorbed by the public.
The consequences are societal. When emotionally harmful behaviour is repeatedly presented and defended at this scale, the threshold for what people accept in their own relationships shifts. That has direct implications for emotional well-being, relationship stability, and family systems.
This is not a call to sanitise reality or eliminate conflict. It is a necessary request for editorial accountability. At this scale, a programme does not merely display behaviour; it actively curates it through selection, framing, repetition, and reward. Those decisions determine what audiences come to tolerate, justify, and normalise.
When millions are watching, and influential voices are defending what is broadcast, this ceases to be passive entertainment. It becomes behavioural reinforcement.
How this season is remembered will not hinge on individual contestants. It will hinge on whether the broadcaster and production leadership recognised their role in shaping public norms, or chose to look away while those norms were reshaped on their platform.
@pradeepmilroy@VijaySethuOffl@vijaytelevision@JioHotstartam@EndemolShineIND
#BiggBossTamil #BiggBossTamil9 #BiggBoss9Tamil
@ola_supports Hi Ola, we missed a bag in an Ola auto. The driver was good and handed over the bag after sometime. But the cash in couple of wallets amounting to 10,000 INR has gone missing. I can provide the booking number in DM if you respond. Please help.
@saviharish @csamudhan It's mentioned 'Her Daughter', which means, the friend is a female. And her daughter, a female. Who's the His mentioned in the tweet? That's the mix up. 😇
@sidarjun7188@csamudhan@angry_birdu It was mentioned "Her Daughter". Her is the friend, a female. Daughter, a female. Both are female here 😇 who is the 'His' mentioned in the tweet? That's the mix up.
@ASUSIndia Hi Asus India, I am from Chennai, India.
Am really looking forward to buy the Asus 8z - 256GB variant.
I am not able to find it anywhere online. There's only 128GB available. Could you please help?
I really need the Asus 8z - 256GB variant. Thanks in Advance.
@amazonIN, I was checking out a product. One seller, with lesser ratings, is selling it at 1,990 and another seller with wonderful ratings is selling it at 1,480.
When I am trying to add the 1,480 one to the cart, it's failing to add. But 1,990 is getting added. Why this?
@AmazonHelp It's not a concern related to pricing. Two buyers are listed. I should be able to choose either one. While I am able to add the first one (1990) in cart, the second (1480) is failing. Want to know why it's failing to add that in cart.