@JustBlogBaby You don’t start a rebuild by devoting $65m a year to a 30 year old who has injury issues and who will probably have more with the way he plays. As good as he is, we have too many holes to fill to take on such a luxury/salary.
@ryanmcfadden_ Two main factors. Who could we get at QB if we traded out? and who are we trading with? If it’s a contender, several potential late picks are not worth much.
@VinnyBonsignore@Raiders@VegasNation Do you truly believe that Pete Carroll thought we were a 10 win team or was it just bravado …. and which of those two options is worse?
@_callumstone …. to be counting pennies atm, I’m a bit surprised Gyokeres is the choice (if he is) as his age suggests it’s unlikely he is worth more in 3 or 4 years than he is now (unlike Sesko).
I would rather pay the extra £ and do whatever it takes to get Isak but that seems dead now.
@_callumstone Hi Mate. I don’t know if you want an Arsenal fans view here but obviously we have had the Sesko v Gyokorws debate for a while now. General feeling seems to be Sesko is the choice based on age and potential and his fit for English football (he’s a big bugger). As your guys seem …