@RoyalsUncensrd@katienicholl@TheRoyalButler Prince Harry and Meghan Sussex would never talk to any of you clowns. Where are you getting this nonsense? Enough with the "sources" and "insiders".
@SkyNewsAust Another "source", but this one is "well placed"! And Tina Brown.... Really? I don't see a problem with him wanting to keep his family safe. I hope he decides not to bring them along. Then what will you talk about?
@DailyMail This is the dumbest thing I thing you guys have ever written. Aren't you being sued for doing something like this? And you believe RIchard Eden? What is your end goal with this bogus article?
@Mama_Gully You could've just said "Princess Catherine is elegant and classy. Even when climbing mountains!". Perfect! But nobody would have paid it any attention, so you added Meghan Sussex name. "Entitled, grandiose and odious"? Really? When? 🤣😂
@TinaBrownLM I am amazed at how happy you are that an entire family, including children, would be at risk in Prince Harry's home country. So if they do not come, what issue will you have with that? 'It will be MEGHAN's fault, of course!'
@DailyMail What does Meghan Sussex have to do with this? How is this another "rival"? Have they ever met even? You guys really do have a "dangerous obsession"!
@MayraTweety@feminegra Sure she can. It's the media that compared her and Meghan Sussex with a video from 4 years ago. There was no need for them to do that.
@RE_DailyMail You could've just wrote they were having a family dinner (even if rare). That would've been nice. But of course you had to include Prince Harry's name so someone would even LOOK at your article. You are sad and exhausting.
@WestminsterWAG "Peak Kate"? How is it "Peak Kate" when Meghan's Name/Pict first in your article? In every article you write, Meghan's name is somewhere in there. It's not even sad anymore. So pathetic!