@Thedukeistheman@DavidCamham1@punchkicker2017@QuantumHawk666 Claims are subjective. I am talking about the standard of morality.
The claim "Trees are mindless" is subjective because it comes from your mind.
But it points to an objective reality.
Do you get what i mean?
(...)
@DavidCamham1@punchkicker2017@QuantumHawk666 Mute me. I dont care.
Morality IS objective.
Normative claims "oughts" require a mind to ground them.
Morality is also universal. If its NOT universal, its subjective.
Subjective things cant be normative.
So you lose the "ought" that morality depends on.
How can you debate this?
@DavidCamham1@punchkicker2017@QuantumHawk666 You havent made an argument against my claim because you dont believe logic is objective to begin with.
Your whole framework is build on sand and you act like you are intellectually superior.
Debates about subjective stuff is irrelevant. Its just throwing out opinions.
@punchkicker2017@penguinteamsix@QuantumHawk666 No. Just like logic. And that means they dont exist in your worldview because putting stuff in the microscope is the only way to prove they are real according to you.
@punchkicker2017@penguinteamsix@QuantumHawk666 No. He doesnt have to.
You all show the fruits of the atheistic framework.
Doesnt require much discernment.
A single question destroyed your whole worldview.
@punchkicker2017@penguinteamsix@QuantumHawk666 Yeah yeah. Logic isnt real in your worldview and you think you can form a coherent argument.
Peanut brain retarded low iq wannabe intellectuals.
π€£