@im1your1man@cucumbersom3@write_tor Here is a similar recent type of study, though I believe there are some good ones decades old that make the same sort of conclusions: https://t.co/coo8Pox6Y7
@BecomingCritter idk I mean from their perspective they go to a place and then feel some movement, motion, and then they’re somewhere else. i think they can grasp that
@RegularSanStan Really don't see how anything here lines up wit contemporary ecofascists, self-described and otherwise. Vry clearly the tweet shows a moralist stance which explicitly demands an expansion of our circles of care. Eco-fascists would EMBRACE non-human behavior-tis a blueprint for us
@FinalSixth@_smoze Do you think we should abstain because of its etymology or just its modern functional use? I would buy that there is something problematic in the concept that such words, including stupid, draw upon — sometimes recommended substitutions just change the word but other times not
honestly a couple of years ago id call this performative but lowkey i feel like what i wanna hear from people is just the general denouncing of transphobia itself when its increasingly being normalized
be far easier to critique word choice, points and context chosen or ignored, phrasing, etc to point out bias in reporting. But that isn’t as sexy perhaps, more boring to most content consumers who want to engage with big picture/headlines. Which is obviously understandable
Ehh, I’m wary of side-by-side headline comparisons because often it’s a matter of subject and length and style which don’t necessarily prove a big slant. But yea it’s good to critique trends in headlines like this
Ultimately I see on OP’s page a lot of great criticisms of pretty blatant pro-Israeli anti-Palestinian bias, but critiquing headlines and trying to do little rewrites/edits on them (assuming you’re trying to be genuine) is difficult and requires some skill. Bulk of article would-