skyjock

SYDNEY, HUNG DADDY, RAW, Luvs UNCUT Lads

[XXL @jimmyholss]

Torremolinos is fun 🙂‍↕️

[skyjock @sky_jock]

@jimmyholss Next big holiday is Sydney Australia. You can stay at my house and I’ll even let you indulge in Pants-Free-Sundays !!!!!! Fuck yeah L,,,

[skyjock @sky_jock]

@jimmyholss Jimmy you look bloody awesome mate X

[rosben @Rosben77]

Tina’s pig

[Danny D @DannyDxxx]

Dropping on my page in an hour !

Don’t forget to sub and see this one 👀

https://t.co/wWpUsQ6kEo

[Danny D @DannyDxxx]

The Halfway HandJob

Slow Strokes, Hit Different Folks!!

My Biggest Ever Cumshot

https://t.co/wJb6nXAXjW

[Danny D @DannyDxxx]

Liss decided it was time to Play!! 20 Mins of Edging, Tease & Denial!! 😈

Teased with Latex Gloves, Oil Massage and a bag of Garden Peas!! 😧

https://t.co/T4G3o0YaGS

[Evan Pitcher @evanpitcher]

we’re gonna do this my way…

[Evan Pitcher @evanpitcher]

it’s not gonna suck itself…

[Evan Pitcher @evanpitcher]

do you want to makeout with me?

[Phillip Holdern @phillipholdern]

EXHIBITIONIST PISSING
#exibicionista #mijo #natureza #outdoors #nature #piss #bushycock #pentelhudo #pentelhos #polla #verga #pica #pintoawardsㅤ #tesao #hotgay ㅤㅤ

[Phillip Holdern @phillipholdern]

REIFICATION

Commodity exchange and the corresponding subjective and objective commodity relations existed, as we know, when society was still very primitive. What is at issue here, however, is the question: how far is commodity exchange together with its structural consequences able to influence the total outer and inner life of society? Thus the extent to which such exchange is the dominant form of metabolic change in a society cannot simply be treated in quantitative terms—as would harmonise with the modern modes of thought already eroded by the reifying effects of the dominant commodity form. The distinction between a society where this form is dominant, permeating every expression of life, and a society where it only makes an episodic appearance is essentially one of quality. For depending on which is the case, all the subjective and objective phenomena in the societies concerned are objectified in qualitatively different ways.

Marx lays great stress on the essentially episodic appearance of the commodity form in primitive societies: “Direct barter, the original natural form of exchange, represents rather the beginning of the transformation of use-values into commodities, than that of commodities into money. Exchange value has as yet no form of its own, but is still directly bound up with use-value. This is manifested in two ways. Production, in its entire organisation, aims at the creation of use-values and not of exchange values, and it is only when their supply exceeds the measure of consumption that use-values cease to be use-values, and become means of exchange, i.e. commodities. At the same time, they become commodities only within the limits of being direct use-values distributed at opposite poles, so that the commodities to be exchanged by their possessors must be use-values to both—each commodity to its non-possessor. As a matter of fact, the exchange of commodities originates not within the primitive communities, but where they end, on their borders at the few points where they come in contact with other communities. That is where barter begins, and from here it strikes back into the interior of the community, decomposing it.”¹ We note that the observation about the disintegrating effect of a commodity exchange directed in upon itself clearly shows the qualitative change engendered by the dominance of commodities.

However, even when commodities have this impact on the internal structure of a society, this does not suffice to make them constitutive of that society. To achieve that it would be necessary—as we emphasized above—for the commodity structure to penetrate society in all its aspects and to remould it in its own image. It is not enough merely to establish an external link with independent processes concerned with the production of exchange values. The qualitative difference between the commodity as one form among many regulating the metabolism of human society and the commodity as the universal structuring principle has effects over and above the fact that the commodity relation as an isolated phenomenon exerts a negative influence at best on the structure and organisation of society. The distinction also has repercussions upon the nature and validity of the category itself. Where the commodity is universal it manifests itself differently from the commodity as a particular, isolated, non-dominant phenomenon.

——GYÖRGY LUKÁCS, History and Class Counciousness.

[Evan Jordie @evanxjordie]

Was feeling bored