SkyDAO

[SkyDAO @skydaoglobal]

SkyDAO is proud to support our new partner TradingSkill 🚀
Together, we are entering the new era of AI-powered trading:
🤖 AI-driven strategy execution
🛡 Real-time risk control
⚡ Compute power empowering performance
🌍 Built for global markets and real liquidity

[Alex 👽 @AlexesNakamoto]

21M Bitcoin.

• Individuals – 11,800,000 BTC
• Lost – 3,500,000 BTC
• Spot ETFs – 1,500,000 BTC
• Public Companies – 1,218,000 BTC
• Other (exchanges, miners…) – 1,356,000 BTC
• Not yet mined – 976,178 BTC
• Governments – 650,000 BTC

[CZ 🔶 BNB @cz_binance]

May the 4s be with you. And kill all FUD!

[SkyDAO @skydaoglobal]

前瞻性思维，做时代的先行者。当区块链遇上AI：数据成为资产，智能成为协议。AI负责创造与决策，区块链负责确权与价值分配——一个生成世界，一个定义规则。

[Neo🌍SKYDAO @SkyDAO_Trust]

2019年我和谭博一起写的这本关于区块链技术的书中就提到了区块链与AI的化学反应以及去中心化自治智能体，那个时候我们就认为区块链就是为了AI而生的！

[SkyDAO @skydaoglobal]

Our SkyDAO community always shows up for every offline gathering. Frequent meetups, deep sharing, strong connections—building Web3 together side by side🥳

[SkyDAO @skydaoglobal]

SkyDAO Card just got an upgrade.

Now works with Apple Pay 
Tap your phone.
Spend your crypto.

Simple as that.
Apply now 🥳https://t.co/IR1lYsbmPK

[Neo🌍SKYDAO @SkyDAO_Trust]

这条评论的转发和点赞这么多，看来大家对这个事件比较感兴趣，所以我再补充一下：

首先美国将太子集团和陈志这个案子定性诈骗在英美法律框架下根本不合理，所以直至目前为止美国法院也拿不出任何实质性的证据证明太子集团和陈志诈骗。所以他们定性的第二条罪名洗钱也就不存在了，因为那是人家正当收益。但是实际情况呢，陈志作为原籍中国人，在中国的法律框架下他们开设线上博彩，组织开发和运营园区并提供诈骗场地又是确实存在的犯罪行为，所以也是真实的犯罪所得资金洗钱。所以陈志被最终带回中国合情合理。而美国只能大肆宣扬并冻结没收资产和借此洗白盗窃的比特币，其实是过份的长臂执法行为和强盗逻辑。并且导致全球的华人名声和中国政府声誉受损！

[SkyDAO @skydaoglobal]

AI is depreciating execution while appreciating vision and 'perseverance.'The moat of 0→1 is being eroded by technology. What becomes the hardest currency in the next chapter of civilization: the imagination to take 1→100, and the willpower to keep exploring where no map exists

[Neo🌍SKYDAO @SkyDAO_Trust]

In the age of AI, human intelligence is rapidly depreciating.
With AI’s growing power, basic R&D, design, and integration have become ridiculously simple.
0→1 is losing its premium.
@peterthiel
What truly matters now:
The imagination to go from 1→100 (or beyond),
and the willpower — the deep mission — to continuously operate and evolve AI capabilities.@ericzhu

[SkyDAO @skydaoglobal]

Security = minimizing the gap between intent and outcome.
No perfection — only layered alignment and redundancy.

[vitalik.eth @VitalikButerin]

How I think about "security":

The goal is to minimize the divergence between the user's intent, and the actual behavior of the system.

"User experience" can also be defined in this way. Thus, "user experience" and "security" are thus not separate fields. However, "security" focuses on tail risk situations (where downside of divergence is large), and specifically tail risk situations that come about as a result of adversarial behavior.

One thing that becomes immediately obvious from the above definition, is that "perfect security" is impossible. Not because machines are "flawed", or even because humans designing the machines are "flawed", but because "the user's intent" is fundamentally an extremely complex object that the user themselves does not have easy access to.

Suppose the user's intent is "I want to send 1 ETH to Bob". But "Bob" is itself a complicated meatspace entity that cannot be easily mathematically defined. You could "represent" Bob with some public key or hash, but then the possibility that the public key or hash is not actually Bob becomes part of the threat model. The possibility that there is a contentious hard fork, and so the question of which chain represents "ETH" is subjective. In reality, the user has a well-formed picture about these topics, which gets summarized by the umbrella term "common sense", but these things are not easily mathematically defined.

Once you get into more complicated user goals - take, for example, the goal of "preserving the user's privacy" - it becomes even more complicated. Many people intuitively think that encrypting messages is enough, but the reality is that the metadata pattern of who talks to whom, and the timing pattern between messages, etc, can leak a huge amount of information. What is a "trivial" privacy loss, versus a "catastrophic" loss?

If you're familiar with early Yudkowskian thinking about AI safety, and how simply specifying goals robustly is one of the hardest parts of the problem, you will recognize that this is the same problem.

Now, what do "good security solutions" look like?

This applies for:

* Ethereum wallets
* Operating systems
* Formal verification of smart contracts or clients or any computer programs
* Hardware
* ...

The fundamental constraint is: anything that the user can input into the system is fundamentally far too low-complexity to fully encode their intent. I would argue that the common trait of a good solution is: the user is specifying their intention in multiple, overlapping ways, and the system only acts when these specifications are aligned with each other.

Examples:

* Type systems in programming: the programmer first specifies *what the program does* (the code itself), but then also specifies *what "shape" each data structure has at every step of the computation*. If the two diverge, the program fails to compile.
* Formal verification: the programmer specifies what the program does (the code itself), and then also specifies mathematical properties that the program satisfies
* Transaction simulations: the user specifies first what action they want to take, and then clicks "OK" or "Cancel" after seeing a simulation of the onchain consequences of that action
* Post-assertions in transactions: the transaction specifies both the action and its expected effects, and both have to match for the transaction to take effect
* Multisig / social recovery: the user specifies multiple keys that represent their authority
* Spending limits, new-address confirmations, etc: the user specifies first what action they want to take, and then, if that action is "unusual" or "high-risk" in some sense, the user has to re-specify "yes, I know I am doing something unusual / high-risk"

In all cases, the pattern is the same: there is no perfection, there is only risk reduction through redundancy. And you want the different redundant specifications to "approach the user's intent" from different "angles": eg. action, and expected consequences, expected level of significance, economic bound on downside, etc

This way of thinking also hints at the right way to use LLMs. LLMs done right are themselves a simulation of intent. A generic LLM is (among other things) like a "shadow" of the concept of human common sense. A user-fine-tuned LLM is like a "shadow" of that user themselves, and can identify in a more fine-grained way what is normal vs unusual.

LLMs should under no circumstances be relied on as a sole determiner of intent. But they are one "angle" from which a user's intent can be approximated. It's an angle very different from traditional, explicit, ways of encoding intent, and that difference itself maximizes the likelihood that the redundancy will prove useful.

One other corollary is that "security" does NOT mean "make the user do more clicks for everything". Rather, security should mean: it should be easy (if not automated) to do low-risk things, and hard to do dangerous things. Getting this balance right is the challenge.

[SkyDAO @skydaoglobal]

Happy Chinese New Year🎉

[SkyDAO @skydaoglobal]

Recently, SkyDAO Group Chairman @SkyDAO_Trust invited influential global leaders and innovators for private discussions on the future of the world and how to strategically position for the next phase of project growth.
In times of uncertainty, real leadership means building ahead

[SkyDAO @skydaogroup]

Eric Zhu is here.
From a 17-year-old high school founder featured by TechCrunch
to a serial builder behind breakout, culture-shifting projects —
this time, he stepped into the SkyDAO Office.
A closed-door conversation with SkyDAO Group Chairman Neo,
diving deep into:

[SkyDAO @skydaoglobal]

Honored to welcome Michael Terpin to the SkyDAO office.
He met with SkyDAO Group Chairman Neo Wang to discuss the future of Web3 and potential collaboration.
Michael also presented a signed copy of Bitcoin Supercycle — a symbol of long-term conviction in crypto @SkyDAO_Trust

[SkyDAO @skydaogroup]

Welcomed Michael Terpin, founder of Transform Ventures, to the SkyDAO office.He met with SkyDAO Group Chairman Neo Wang to discuss Web3’s future and potential collaboration, and gifted a signed copy of Bitcoin Supercycle.
Building the future of Web3 — together. 🚀@SkyDAO_Trust

[SkyDAO @skydaoglobal]

Web3, meet the real world.

SkyDAO Card
Spend globally. Anywhere Visa works.
Crypto, actually usable💳🌍 #btc #usdt #crypto

[SkyDAO @skydaoglobal]

keep building💪

[Binance @binance]

Keep building, and keep moving forward. 🫡

[SkyDAO @skydaoglobal]

@SkyDAO_Trust @lichunf66070921 @sunyuchentron 果然科学的尽头是神学😂

[SkyDAO @skydaoglobal]

AI doesn’t eliminate value.
It eliminates commodity intelligence.
What remains are vision, courage, and conviction💡

[Neo🌍SKYDAO @SkyDAO_Trust]

The Industrial Revolution made “physical labor ”cheap.
The AI Revolution is making “intellectual labor ”cheap.
Most current organizations are about to be disrupted.
Next era:
First → imagination
Then → willpower (the strength of your vision + the depth of your mission)

[SkyDAO @skydaoglobal]

See you in Shenzhen！

[ChainInsight链洞察 @ChainInsightCN]

【2026 Web3 行业交流会暨颁奖典礼 · 深圳】

迈入更理性的 2026，Web3 正从叙事驱动走向结构化生长。

ChainInsight 联合 WeWeb3 发起首届线下行业交流会暨年度颁奖典礼，拒绝空谈，聚焦真实项目、实务经验与 2026 战略布局，与长期主义者共聚深圳。

🔍 观察｜生态趋势 · 合规实务 · 市场研判
🏆 盛典｜研究 · 内容 · 安全等专业奖项
📅 1月27日 14:00–18:30
📍 深圳 · 福田

🔗 报名：https://t.co/LyA8ucVZ9c

#ChainInsight #Web3 #CryptoEvent #Blockchain2026 #LongTermism

[SkyDAO @skydaoglobal]

SkyDAO integrates a diverse product suite to seamlessly connect payments, assets, and digital identity—building a future-ready global payment ecosystem #skydao #btc #web3

[SkyDAO @skydaoglobal]

🚀 The SkyDAO App upgrade is now complete.Please update to the latest version on the App Store and explore the improved experience.Thank you for your continued support #skydao

[SkyDAO @skydaoglobal]

🚧 SkyDAO Card upgrade underway
Some services are temporarily limited.
⏰ Full access returns Jan 14, 20:00.
Appreciate your understanding #skydao