HR_Hack'N_Slack

I think for myself. 'Nough said.

[HR_Hack'N_Slack @slack_hr]

@RangerElessar @BumpstockBarbie You forgot to qualify "losers with "deluded fascist".

[HR_Hack'N_Slack @slack_hr]

@RangerElessar @BrassVon @BumpstockBarbie What's wrong? All out of serious and intelligent replies? Where are those statistics showing culpability for women stands a chance, bucko? And don't tell me your dog ate them.

[HR_Hack'N_Slack @slack_hr]

@asfaloth_12 @BumpstockBarbie Whatever, just be sure to put those penalties where your mouth is.

[HR_Hack'N_Slack @slack_hr]

@BumpstockBarbie @RangerElessar You're only as strong as your political machine. If Pro-Life can't cough up the culpability for women, then by default, neither can you, even though you support culpability yourself. By admitting you're really powerless as you just did, then you lose.

[HR_Hack'N_Slack @slack_hr]

@asfaloth_12 @BumpstockBarbie I hope you know where the off switch is on your "political machine" and for god sake don't put it in your mouth!

[HR_Hack'N_Slack @slack_hr]

@BumpstockBarbie You're only as effective as your political machine. Your personal principles don't mean diddly on a national, state, or even a local level. Context isn't your strong suite is it?

[HR_Hack'N_Slack @slack_hr]

@BumpstockBarbie @CraigVecellio @RangerElessar That question coming from a pathological liar without principals like yourself is not surprising at all.

[HR_Hack'N_Slack @slack_hr]

@CraigVecellio @BumpstockBarbie @RangerElessar You're ass is on backwards. Better check it.

[HR_Hack'N_Slack @slack_hr]

@CraigVecellio @BumpstockBarbie @RangerElessar Prove it. Your word isn't good enough.

[HR_Hack'N_Slack @slack_hr]

@BumpstockBarbie @RangerElessar Pro-Life states with their "trigger laws" in effect, than her unborn child, because if she kills the dog, the state will act in some way even if it's only a fine. If she has her unborn child killed, then NOTHING happens to her. Contextully "you" here is a euphemism for Pro-Life.

[HR_Hack'N_Slack @slack_hr]

@BumpstockBarbie @RangerElessar Then you are letting them off the hook. No culpability, then they're off the hook. Maybe this will give you a clue to how ridiculous your position is: speaking strictly in terms of the woman's own legal culpability, a dog has greater legal protection for its life in (cont)

[HR_Hack'N_Slack @slack_hr]

@BumpstockBarbie @RangerElessar Evidently your principals are based on lying to yourself, which is fine, if it was just yourself, but you are lying to women as well, so in fact you have no principles.

[HR_Hack'N_Slack @slack_hr]

@BumpstockBarbie @RangerElessar Actually it does. Because justice isn't being done. 1. Your letting someone off the hook for having their unborn child killed. 2. That child is being deprived of an important part of it's right to life.
That isn't how society protects human life. Lying to yourself changes nothing

[HR_Hack'N_Slack @slack_hr]

@BumpstockBarbie @RangerElessar Show me where I demanded 100%.
I did ask for a majority, true.
However, I am willing to accept political traction per that example I gave. That is, your fuselage is at least trying to sprout wings.

[HR_Hack'N_Slack @slack_hr]

@28fishmap @asfaloth_12 @RangerElessar @BumpstockBarbie I have been accused of that, yes.

[HR_Hack'N_Slack @slack_hr]

@BumpstockBarbie @RangerElessar Morals can be like opinions. Meaning, they can be poorly thought out and not have any credibility. No ability to prosecute, then you have misapplied a biological definition on to society.

[HR_Hack'N_Slack @slack_hr]

@BumpstockBarbie @RangerElessar Since when is a majority of public support ever at 100%?
That's silly.

[HR_Hack'N_Slack @slack_hr]

@BumpstockBarbie @RangerElessar Show me the statistics, honey.
Your "some" opinion isn't acceptable.

[HR_Hack'N_Slack @slack_hr]

@RangerElessar @BumpstockBarbie You're making an assumption that I want 100%. Prove you have some sort of traction. For example, let's say you can show me that in 2015 10% of the population supported culpability, but now in 2022 25% do. Show me growth. As it is now, you have produced 0. No wings at all.

[HR_Hack'N_Slack @slack_hr]

@asfaloth_12 @BumpstockBarbie I would have wasted my time, because it was evident by the nature of your question that you don't have the comprehension skills to have understood an intelligent reply.