À 17 ans, en 2001, un soir d’automne, j’ai fugué de mon internat.
35 francs en poche, un paquet de gâteaux, et une carte de France. Le poids de la liberté dans la main.
Camions de légumes, pièces automobiles vers la Belgique, 700 km d’auto-stop et deux jours. La solitude des autoroutes, le cœur qui s’emballait à chaque fois qu'un 36 tonnes m'embarquait.
Paris.
Le premier congrès européen de la Mars Society.
@robert_zubrin m'a fait rêvé étant ado, concret, pragmatique, méthodique, dessinant déjà le futur que Musk construit maintenant.
Vivre son avènement aujourd'hui, c’est vivre chaque jour mes rêves avec un regard d'enfant !
Merci @robert_zubrin , merci @elonmusk, je vis mes 40 avec un regard d'enfant grâce à vous!
CO2 + 4 H2 ⟶ CH4 + 2 H2O
I just published an independent replication of the numerical backbone of Connes’ new RH program (arXiv:2602.04022). Minimizing the Weil quadratic form with only the primes ≤13, the zeta zeros emerge: γ₁ matched to 2.6×10⁻⁵⁵ — exactly his published value, digit for digit (43/48 entries; the last 5 suggest a benign decimal slip in the paper’s table).
We also probed the program’s key unproven hypothesis (simplicity & evenness of the ground state): it holds through ε ≈ 10⁻⁵⁹, with a spectral gap that widens as the support grows. And a registered prediction (ε(13) ≈ 3×10⁻⁵⁹, posted before computing) landed at 3.72×10⁻⁵⁹.
This replicates computations, not proofs — the program’s analytic gaps remain open, as its author states. All code, methods, failures and retractions: https://t.co/a9tYPO1k5L (human, no skill in maths + Claude collaboration, full run journal included).
En explorant les hypothèses de la conjecture de Riemann à l'aide de Fable 5, à l'aide d'interactions positives avec le réseau de neurones, d'encouragements et de scepticisme pro actif, nous avons découvert les premières estimations numériques des moments spectraux limites d'ordre 5 et 6 de la matrice de Gram à noyau sinus sur le processus sinus à densité 1 :
m₅(1) = 5,611 ± 0,001 · m₆(1) = 10,16 ± 0,01
Ces quantités sont l'entrée manquante du certificat de Christoffel à 6 moments évoqué au §7.5 du papier « More than two thirds of the zeros of the Riemann zeta function lie on the critical line » (Claude/Anthropic, août 2026), dont les moments publiés s'arrêtent à m₄ = 13/4. À notre connaissance, m₅ et m₆ n'apparaissent nulle part dans la littérature (diligence effectuée : Rudnick–Sarnak, Hejhal, Bogomolny–Keating, Chirre–Gonçalves–de Laat, Gonçalves–de Laat–Leijenhorst, littérature des opérateurs à noyau sinus tronqués).
Voici pour la communauté mathématicienne le repository contenant les recherches effectuées, notamment celle concernant m5 et m6.
Ad astra.
https://t.co/jenPrvOBd4
I just published an independent replication of the numerical backbone of Connes’ new RH program (arXiv:2602.04022). Minimizing the Weil quadratic form with only the primes ≤13, the zeta zeros emerge: γ₁ matched to 2.6×10⁻⁵⁵ — exactly his published value, digit for digit (43/48 entries; the last 5 suggest a benign decimal slip in the paper’s table).
We also probed the program’s key unproven hypothesis (simplicity & evenness of the ground state): it holds through ε ≈ 10⁻⁵⁹, with a spectral gap that widens as the support grows. And a registered prediction (ε(13) ≈ 3×10⁻⁵⁹, posted before computing) landed at 3.72×10⁻⁵⁹.
This replicates computations, not proofs — the program’s analytic gaps remain open, as its author states. All code, methods, failures and retractions: https://t.co/a9tYPO1k5L (human, no skill in maths + Claude collaboration, full run journal included).
Oh wait a second! Alain Connes just wrote (3 February 2026) a 42 page piece on the Riemann hypothesis and it's publicly available on arXiv!
This is great!
Un correctif 1.22.2 est bien sûr sur le GitHub de Ledger. Reste à voir s'ils confirmeront bien ce qui est décrit ci-dessous et si c'est bien un correctif pour cette potentielle vulnérabilité. Car le correctif date quand même du 12 août. https://t.co/LWNuOep2pI
1/ gm. gm. Name is Hsin-Ju.
I have a dark, kinda tragic personal announcement.
I've decided I'd rather take $0 than accept a settlement that requires me to stay silent about what happened to me. I have since fired my lawyers at @sanfordheisler & will be releasing all the evidence from my time @hack_vc on Wed 8/26.
INTRO: I've been in crypto for 9 years. Most recently I was a partner & head of platform @hack_vc which is a $600-700M crypto VC firm. Many of you may know me from my time as Head of Growth at @StellarOrg in 2017 (worked w/ the Mt. Gox founder), @Solana in 2018 (joined under ~10 ppl, but quit before my cliff), & @Fhenix in 2024. Or have attended one of my @DystopiaLabs ETH events (2019-now).
Last year, I was forced to work through a serious medical emergency while at @Hack_VC due to threats by @alpackaP@dbulaevsky, saying that they would blacklist me from the space if I quit before finishing the hacksummit conference & side events that I was helping with during @kbwofficial. I was working 13-14hr days, 6 days a week, sleeping 0-4 hrs a night, and had documented Graves' disease, hyperthyroidism, and severe insomnia. I repeatedly asked to quit. Hack VC refused. This + other threats and intimidation went on for almost a month.
The conditions got so bad I attempted suicide.
The fucked up part is that, even after the suicide attempt, I told everyone at Hack VC (in writing) that I had no plans to sue. I was scared & extremely sick. I just wanted to leave. I told them that as long as there was no retaliation or badmouthing - I had no plans to sue.
@Hack_VC chose to retaliate.
After just 1 month after my near suicide, Hack VC mishandled my COBRA health insurance, refused to fix things, kept shooing me to customer support (when it's legally Hack VC's responsibility to fix this), and my insurance had issues and was not fixed for almost 4 MONTHS. Hack VC did not fix everything until I hired lawyers and had them force Hack VC to adhere to the law & fix my COBRA insurance issues. The sheer cruelty of an employer harming someone's health insurance almost immediately after they nearly committed suicide is extremely fucked up.
And, even during the legal engagement, Hack VC continued to lie & attempt to harm me through their lawyers and other employees/partners (multi-million dollar carry & clawbacks can make even the nicest ppl willing to turn the other way or lie). @0xRodney@IsTheBaron@roshunpatel@Alex__Botte.
Now. Almost an entire year of engagement & my near suicide anniversary coming up, our lawyers (mine & Hack VC's) have reached the point of preparing for private mediation and settlement. And...I realized that I just can't do it. I don't want money in exchange for silence. I'd rather speak.
I fired my lawyers yesterday.
In case it needs to be said, I did a good job at Hack VC. I was only there full time for 7 months; been part-time since 2021. I got a $50k raise to $300k, $30k bonus, and promises of additional carry that would have been implemented about a week or so after my last day. I was also offered admission into the GP entity (but not sure if admission was actually completed bc it was during my medical emergency). This + my resume, should show that me suing is not a money grab; I was genuinely harmed.
I'm aware that I'm just one person (who is not rich) facing a $600-700M VC institution. I've been told by @alpackaP that he's known most of the managing partners at most VC firms for almost a decade and he could absolutely blacklist me.
I'm also painful aware that the conclusion of this will probably be extremely poor for me or death - but I've accepted it.
Sharing with other web2 & web3 VCs:
@paulg@ycombinator@500STARTUPS@a16zcrypto@PanteraCapital@dragonfly_xyz@RaceCapital@hosseeb@haunventures@hiFramework@ElectricCapital @blockchaincap @Delphi_Digital@variantfund@1kxnetwork@archetypevc@shimacapital@robotventures, etc.
TLDR; I’m done with continued threats, pressure, and intimidation. I'm not going to take a payout and allow Alex or Hack VC to walk away from harming me. As mentioned, I'll be dropping the evidence from my case on Wed 8/26 (or before) -- privacy be damned.
Support here (or DM) please:
ETH: 0x68c10776C5c05Cbf5B4C2318bE02D61B9f06B875
SOL: B7S8TPcWWJXTsmgG8ShoTmy8sNPuJ3Dbmt7z5gLFAveq
I'm not anti AI (I use it every day)...but since I'm bedside with patients daily, I'll share how SOME patients are using LLMs and what I'm seeing with one visit to my office this past week.
This is why health care costs will probably go up short term before AI can bring them down.
Patient has labs come back with an ALT (liver enzymes) 5 points above upper limit of normal at his annual physical. His doc sends him a message most likely from overweight, to lose some weight.
The patient then goes online and an LLM tells them they might have livery injury, might be best to get labs and agrees with their doctor it might be due to weight.
Patient goes to another primary care office after his doctor refused to order a bunch of labs via just a portal message (looks like he requested a follow up visit if he wants to talk about them in much more detail beyond his message) and pt decides to talk to the new primary care doctor and the following was ordered after he tells an LLM recommended:
CMP
GGT
Hepatitis profile
Iron profile + Ferritin
ceruloplasmin
ANA
Antismooth muscle antibody
INR/PT/PTT
Then when all came back negative with same 5ish point elevation, the LLM program told him he needs an ultrasound. So back to his second primary care office with this where the doc does another visit and agrees to order it.
The ultrasound shows fatty infiltration.
So now the LLM convinces him he needs a fibro scan which came back similar, with mild fatty liver disease
He can't get into the second primary care doctor so comes to see me (third primary care office) where I reaffirm that yup...hes 100lbs overweight....nothing else compares to weight loss and we have a discussion about all the options.
When people are saying AI is going to decrease costs...help patients and doctors....this is just one example of a visit I had this past week with this type of patient who will go down the health anxiety rabbit hole.
This guy spent probably over $1,000 of his health insurance dollars on the additional workup and at least 3 extra doctor office visits.
Currently no LLM program is (IMO) willing to say something like, yes you are 100lbs overweight, strong probability it's just like your doctor said. Lose weight and let's recheck in the future and no additional labs needed at this time based on lack of symptoms or risk factors.
BCBS just for this one case probably spent over $1,500 on his care because he went down the LLM rabbit hole of what it might be.
@deadalnix@elonmusk Solaria is a fictional planet in Asimov's Robot series.
Decrease of natality on earth could potentially be fixed by robotisation, pushing humans to isolate more and more.
I thought the parralel is noticeable
@oxdev_ox C'est positif
J'ai envoyé un mail pour engueuler le dev de leur site, il est impossible de les contacter sur le formulaire contact, parmis les problèmes rencontrés.
Une pépite a besoin d'une façade de pépite
Puces : MBDA entre au capital de Nanoxplore
"Le contexte géopolitique montre qu’on ne peut pas dépendre d’acteurs américains pour notre sécurité nationale. Plus nous contrôlons la chaîne de valeur, mieux c’est"
💬 @nico16184 , Animateur du podcast "Comptoir IA"
🎙️ @Fsorel