@witchyousuck@Rengiyuu_yume There have been a large number of horror female leads that have had generational performances since the genre’s inception: in the Oscars’ history, ten women have been nominated for best actress in horror roles and three of those ten have won.
whenever the female enters political propaganda as a figure she must always be erotiziced and she must be a slut, a succubus, a sexy seductress. no humanity is given to her.
@Timcanrun@ReuelWilliams3 I understand your point now. I do think that the comparison to human-based tragedies is a bit gauche and there are fundamental differences in the current needs and behaviors of humans vs animals to make comparison confusing. Their arguments can stand without it. Thank you
@Timcanrun@ReuelWilliams3 Is that his argument? Can you point me to that (genuinely)? I assumed that his argument was predicated on the idea that humans, as morally conscious beings, have the capability/capacity to empathise with animals and thus seek food that doesn’t necessitate mass-production of meat
@Moon_River05@KensingtonRoyal@sueziad May I ask why? Tā moko has been practiced for a thousand years. I am wondering what about it *today* makes it unsuitable or “stupid”? Particularly when she comes from a country where this is a socially and culturally acceptable tattoo?
@Timcanrun@ReuelWilliams3 (I am not vegetarian nor am I particularly interested in the vegetarian twitter wars just dropping in from the TL for the moral quandary)
@Timcanrun@ReuelWilliams3 He didn’t say it was ok for animals to do it, he just said it was amoral and an unfortunate reality of nature. If a disabled person was in that position where killing someone was necessary for their own survival, it wouldn’t be “okay” but it wouldn’t make the disabled person evil
@Red_Mage23 Everyone else’s great points and also perhaps more importantly it would be very ugly and I wouldn’t like to be named “shee” when it could be spelled in an infinitely cooler way
@palmerccio@megievalist@myaurorahong I don’t think Megan is defending, the verse says “whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart." Which is basically christian framework to your point (that watching other people for sexual grat is cheating).
@maybe_almost_@pinkbarbiebrush@madsdanae (These links are things I have been reading recently. They provide some context to my belief which is that the porn industry is nearly wholly exploitative of both its ‘actors’ and audiences).
@maybe_almost_@pinkbarbiebrush@madsdanae I think we agree on a lot. What I don’t like is for necessary criticism of the porn industry to be conflated with being “red pilled”.
https://t.co/cTMC1oGP3x
https://t.co/mezvI2KmVd
https://t.co/0hRN9250n5
https://t.co/IHdCaGSVfw
https://t.co/ucKxg744hr
@maybe_almost_@pinkbarbiebrush@madsdanae —block buster versus the free-for-all that online pornography serves as. The question from there is how to overcome this if we can, whether it’s theough more comprehensive regulations or banning online platforms in their entirety. But that wasn’t my initial point
@maybe_almost_@pinkbarbiebrush@madsdanae The difference with films imo is that there is a process for obtaining consent and the inclusion of workplace safety regulations that categorically does not exist across porn due to how it’s distributed online. I think it’s a lot less likely a trafficked girl will appear in a—
@maybe_almost_@pinkbarbiebrush@madsdanae For point two, I think it’s important to acknowledge when and how archetypes in film can influence real life as well. We can’t just accept “oh they’re using x stereotype”; we have to ask why, for whom, and to what end. https://t.co/8ctAC6EhHr
@maybe_almost_@pinkbarbiebrush@madsdanae All my first point says is that the sex act is actually physically occurring. Though one of my issues with porn is that consent is always “assumed”. There’s no guarantee that what you are watching is ethically or consensually produced bar some exceptions